FACTS the Burzynski critics don’t like
1. the Declaration of Helsinki;
http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3
30. addresses publishing human clinical trial data
It does NOT indicate WHEN the data should be published, leaving it open to interpretation as to if it should be done piecemeal, or when all trials re a specific drug or drugs are completed after Phase I, II, or III, for example
2. The Clinical Trials . gov web-site data re Burzynski is different than the National Cancer Institute (NCI) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) web-site
http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/search/results?protocolsearchid=11475951
http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/search/results?protocolsearchid=11476036
3. Burzynski critics descended on the Colorado Public Television – PBS (#CPT12) Facebook page, but they sure did NOT stick around to address their unsubstantiated posts
https://www.facebook.com/questions/488444654552853
4. Some critics resorted to adolescent-like name-calling and attempted “misdirection” by their use of words like:
“trolls,” “spammers,” “disingenuous,” “dishonest,” “profoundly dishonest,” “sheer stubborn stupid,” “stupid,” “spambot,” “fools,” “shills, “conman”
5. Critics continued their actions on the CPTV comments page
@ColoPublicTV
http://www.cpt12.org
http://www.cpt12.org/tv_schedule/program_details.cfm?id=120130307213000
6. Critics who rant about scientific peer-reviewed journals and their “Impact Factors” did NOT know what to do about this:
National Cancer Institute
at the National Institutes of Health
Cancer Clinical Trials
15. “The results of clinical trials are OFTEN published in peer-reviewed scientific journals”
” … whether or NOT the results are published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal … ”
http://m.cancer.gov/topics/factsheets/clinical-trials
7. Critics didn’t know what to make of this:
Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog 