A recent epistle by Guy Chapman
(@SceptiGuy @vGuyUK)
appeared on the blogosphere proclaiming:
“Homeopaths: Your problem is, Wikipedia is not censored”
“The quacks’ problem with Wikipedia is not that it is censored; it is that Wikipedia is not censored to protect their cherished delusions”
“Wikipedia is marvellous”
“It is the most visited informational site on the internet, and is run on a budget of peanuts, almost entirely by volunteers”
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/2013/04/homeopaths-your-problem-is-wikipedia-is-not-censored
Maybe Guy got the last part wrong
When it comes to the Wikipedia article on the Burzynski Clinic
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Burzynski_Clinic&mobileaction=toggle_view_desktop
it should possibly read:
“… run on a budget of volunteers, almost entirely by peanuts”
(or some other type of “nut”)
Interestingly enough, in regards to
Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business, Part II
one of the “marvelous” censors on Wikipedia ejaculated for all to see
for posterity:
“We are told that 2013 will be a big year, but apparently his plan is to release another
bullshit
movie not to publish useful research”
[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]
([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])
21:52, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Burzynski_Clinic&diff=next&oldid=529537854
Guy Chapman (@SceptiGuy) tweeted at 12:42pm – 14 Mar 13:
Thank you “Guy”
Your 15 seconds of “Fame” starts
NOW !!!
Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog 