“The Skeptics:” Your problem is, Wikipedia IS censored

A recent epistle by Guy Chapman
(@SceptiGuy @vGuyUK)
appeared on the blogosphere proclaiming:

“Homeopaths: Your problem is, Wikipedia is not censored”

“The quacks’ problem with Wikipedia is not that it is censored; it is that Wikipedia is not censored to protect their cherished delusions”

“Wikipedia is marvellous”

“It is the most visited informational site on the internet, and is run on a budget of peanuts, almost entirely by volunteers”
Maybe Guy got the last part wrong

When it comes to the Wikipedia article on the Burzynski Clinic
it should possibly read:

“… run on a budget of volunteers, almost entirely by peanuts”

(or some other type of “nut”)

Interestingly enough, in regards to

Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business, Part II

one of the “marvelous” censors on Wikipedia ejaculated for all to see
for posterity:

“We are told that 2013 will be a big year, but apparently his plan is to release another


movie not to publish useful research”

[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]


21:52, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
Guy Chapman (@SceptiGuy) tweeted at 12:42pm – 14 Mar 13:

Thank you “Guy”

Your 15 seconds of “Fame” starts

NOW !!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s