USA TODAY CENSORS 18 comments of Military Veteran who Protected Their “Right to Free Speech” (They post 119 comments of “The Skeptics™” Troll, Lawrence McNamara) BIAS, CENSORED, CENSORING, CENSORSHIP by BIASED CENSOR

20131116-002818.jpg
——————————————————————
1 – I
——————————————————————

20131118-085814.jpg

20131118-085835.jpg
——————————————————————
2 – Call
——————————————————————

20131118-085905.jpg
——————————————————————
3 – Out
——————————————————————

20131118-085933.jpg
——————————————————————
4 – the
——————————————————————

20131118-085953.jpg
——————————————————————
5 – Intellectual
——————————————————————

20131118-090034.jpg
——————————————————————
6 – Cowards
——————————————————————

20131118-090101.jpg
——————————————————————
7 – of
——————————————————————

20131118-090134.jpg

20131118-090227.jpg
——————————————————————
8 – Cowardice
——————————————————————

20131118-090311.jpg
——————————————————————
9 – at
——————————————————————

20131118-090354.jpg
——————————————————————
10 – USA
——————————————————————

20131118-090424.jpg

20131118-090505.jpg
——————————————————————
11 – TODAY
——————————————————————

20131118-090539.jpg

20131118-090703.jpg
——————————————————————
12 – NATION
——————————————————————

20131118-090815.jpg
——————————————————————
13 – Liz Szabo
——————————————————————

20131118-090848.jpg
——————————————————————
14
——————————————————————

20131118-090928.jpg
——————————————————————
15
——————————————————————

20131118-090958.jpg
——————————————————————
16
——————————————————————

20131118-091048.jpg
——————————————————————
17
——————————————————————

20131118-091118.jpg

20131118-091147.jpg

20131118-091228.jpg
——————————————————————
18
——————————————————————

20131118-091324.jpg
——————————————————————
19
——————————————————————

20131118-091415.jpg
——————————————————————
20
——————————————————————

20131118-091441.jpg

20131118-091524.jpg
——————————————————————
21-22
——————————————————————

20131118-091613.jpg
——————————————————————
23
——————————————————————

20131118-091652.jpg
——————————————————————
24
——————————————————————

20131118-091731.jpg
——————————————————————
25
——————————————————————

20131118-091806.jpg
——————————————————————
26
——————————————————————

20131118-091838.jpg
——————————————————————
27
——————————————————————

20131118-091912.jpg
——————————————————————
28
——————————————————————

20131118-092122.jpg
——————————————————————
29
——————————————————————

20131118-092216.jpg
——————————————————————
30
——————————————————————

20131118-092300.jpg
——————————————————————
31
——————————————————————

20131118-092321.jpg

20131118-092345.jpg
——————————————————————
32
——————————————————————

20131118-092413.jpg
——————————————————————
33
——————————————————————

20131118-092505.jpg

20131118-092532.jpg

20131118-092610.jpg
——————————————————————
34
——————————————————————

20131118-092650.jpg

20131118-092813.jpg

20131118-103329.jpg
——————————————————————
35
——————————————————————

20131118-103352.jpg
——————————————————————
36-37
——————————————————————

20131118-103410.jpg

20131118-103438.jpg
——————————————————————
38
——————————————————————

20131118-103505.jpg
——————————————————————
39
——————————————————————

20131118-103541.jpg
——————————————————————
40
——————————————————————

20131118-103606.jpg
——————————————————————
41
——————————————————————

20131118-103639.jpg
——————————————————————
42
——————————————————————

20131118-103712.jpg
——————————————————————
43
——————————————————————

20131118-103743.jpg
——————————————————————
44
——————————————————————

20131118-103805.jpg
——————————————————————
45
——————————————————————

20131118-103833.jpg
——————————————————————
46
——————————————————————

20131118-103858.jpg
——————————————————————
47
——————————————————————

20131118-103922.jpg

20131118-103955.jpg
——————————————————————
48
——————————————————————

20131118-104025.jpg
——————————————————————
49
——————————————————————

20131118-104057.jpg
——————————————————————
50
——————————————————————

20131118-104121.jpg
——————————————————————
51
——————————————————————

20131118-104156.jpg
——————————————————————
52
——————————————————————

20131118-104236.jpg
——————————————————————
53
——————————————————————

20131118-104312.jpg
——————————————————————
54
——————————————————————

20131118-104344.jpg

20131118-104411.jpg
——————————————————————
55
——————————————————————

20131118-104442.jpg
——————————————————————
56
——————————————————————

20131118-104510.jpg
——————————————————————
57
——————————————————————

20131118-104616.jpg
——————————————————————
58
——————————————————————

20131118-104644.jpg
——————————————————————
59
——————————————————————

20131118-104722.jpg
——————————————————————
60
——————————————————————

20131118-104752.jpg
——————————————————————
61
——————————————————————

20131118-104854.jpg
——————————————————————
62
——————————————————————

20131118-104926.jpg
——————————————————————
63
——————————————————————

20131118-110244.jpg
——————————————————————
64
——————————————————————

20131118-110302.jpg
——————————————————————
65
——————————————————————

20131118-110321.jpg
——————————————————————
66
——————————————————————

20131118-110339.jpg
——————————————————————
67
——————————————————————

20131118-110357.jpg
——————————————————————
68
——————————————————————

20131118-110418.jpg
——————————————————————
69
——————————————————————

20131118-110439.jpg
——————————————————————
70
——————————————————————

20131118-110503.jpg

20131118-110524.jpg
——————————————————————
71
——————————————————————

20131118-110547.jpg
——————————————————————
72
——————————————————————

20131118-110628.jpg
——————————————————————
73
——————————————————————

20131118-110654.jpg
——————————————————————
74
——————————————————————

20131118-110720.jpg
——————————————————————
75
——————————————————————

20131118-110744.jpg
——————————————————————
76
——————————————————————

20131118-110813.jpg
——————————————————————
77
——————————————————————

20131118-110921.jpg

20131118-110949.jpg
——————————————————————
78
——————————————————————

20131118-111012.jpg
——————————————————————
79
——————————————————————

20131118-111051.jpg
——————————————————————
80
——————————————————————

20131118-111128.jpg
——————————————————————
81
——————————————————————

20131118-111154.jpg
——————————————————————
82
——————————————————————

20131118-111229.jpg
——————————————————————
83
——————————————————————

20131118-113729.jpg
——————————————————————
84
——————————————————————

20131118-113749.jpg
——————————————————————
85
——————————————————————

20131118-113807.jpg
——————————————————————
86
——————————————————————

20131118-113823.jpg

20131118-113840.jpg
——————————————————————
87
——————————————————————

20131118-113856.jpg

20131118-113921.jpg

20131118-113954.jpg

20131118-114026.jpg
——————————————————————
88
——————————————————————

20131118-114047.jpg
——————————————————————
89
——————————————————————

20131118-114110.jpg
——————————————————————
90
——————————————————————

20131118-114130.jpg
——————————————————————
91
——————————————————————

20131118-114148.jpg

20131118-114208.jpg
——————————————————————
92
——————————————————————

20131118-114227.jpg

20131118-114252.jpg
——————————————————————
93
——————————————————————

20131118-114334.jpg
——————————————————————
94
——————————————————————

20131118-114401.jpg
——————————————————————
95
——————————————————————

20131118-114453.jpg

20131118-114542.jpg
——————————————————————
96
——————————————————————

20131118-114627.jpg
——————————————————————
97
——————————————————————

20131118-114744.jpg
——————————————————————
98
——————————————————————

20131118-114818.jpg
——————————————————————
99
——————————————————————

20131118-114838.jpg
——————————————————————
100
——————————————————————

20131118-114858.jpg

20131118-114913.jpg
——————————————————————
101
——————————————————————

20131118-114942.jpg
——————————————————————
102
——————————————————————

20131118-115020.jpg
——————————————————————
103
——————————————————————

20131118-115153.jpg

20131118-115214.jpg
——————————————————————
104
——————————————————————

20131118-115235.jpg

20131118-115317.jpg
——————————————————————
105
——————————————————————

20131118-115344.jpg
——————————————————————
106
——————————————————————

20131118-115434.jpg

20131118-115524.jpg
——————————————————————
107
——————————————————————

20131118-115546.jpg
——————————————————————
108
——————————————————————

20131118-115609.jpg
——————————————————————
109
——————————————————————

20131118-115638.jpg
——————————————————————
110
——————————————————————

20131118-115658.jpg
——————————————————————
111
——————————————————————

20131118-115719.jpg
——————————————————————
112
——————————————————————

20131118-115747.jpg
——————————————————————
113
——————————————————————

20131118-115824.jpg
——————————————————————
114
——————————————————————

20131118-115846.jpg
——————————————————————
115
——————————————————————

20131118-115906.jpg
——————————————————————
116
——————————————————————

20131118-115926.jpg
——————————————————————
117
——————————————————————

20131118-115955.jpg
——————————————————————
118
——————————————————————

20131118-122156.jpg
——————————————————————

20131120-074305.jpg
======================================
18 Censored Comments – Critiquing: Doctor accused of selling false hope to families (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY):
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/16/httpwww-usatoday-comstorynewsnation20131115stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy2994561/
======================================
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – 11/15/2013 – USA TODAY NEWS, NATION
Experts dismiss doctor’s cancer claim
Liz Szabo, USA TODAY
——————————————————————
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/burzynski-cancer-science/2994731/
======================================
[1] – 11/16/2013 – Critiquing: Experts dismiss doctor’s cancer claims (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY):
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/16/httpwww-usatoday-comstorynewsnation20131115burzynski-cancer-science2994731/
======================================
[2] – 11/15/2013 – USA TODAY NEWS, NATION
Doctor accused of selling false hope to families
Liz Szabo, USA TODAY
——————————————————————
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy/2994561/
======================================
[2] – 11/16/2013 – Critiquing: Doctor accused of selling false hope to families (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY):
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/16/httpwww-usatoday-comstorynewsnation20131115stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy2994561/
======================================
[3] – 11/15/2013 – USA TODAY NEWS, NATION
Families run out of hope, money after cancer treatments
Liz Szabo, USA TODAY:
——————————————————————
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/jeanine-graf-cancer-children/2994675/
======================================
[3] – 11/17/2013 – Critiquing: Families run out of hope, money after cancer treatments (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY):
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/17/httpwww-usatoday-comstorynewsnation20131115jeanine-graf-cancer-children2994675/
======================================

Critiquing: Families run out of hope, money after cancer treatments (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY)

USA TODAY
Liz Szabo
Michael Stravato
Jerry Mosemak
Robert Hanashiro

Before you write a Hack Piece
Check Your Facts Please

——————————————————————

20131118-084404.jpg
——————————————————————
The 3rd, and thankfully final segment of USA TODAY’s “hit-piece” of irresponsible yellow journalism about Dr. Stanislaw R. Burzynski [1], contains the following:
——————————————————————
“Patients stay in hotels while visiting him”
——————————————————————
Pete Cohen made this movie about his and
Hannah Bradley’s trip to the Burzynski Clinic

It does NOT look like they stayed in a hotel [2]
——————————————————————
The article continues:
——————————————————————
“If children deteriorate, they often end up in the closest emergency room, said physician Jeanine Graf, director of the pediatric intensive care unit at Texas Children’s Hospital in Houston, who says she has treated at least a dozen of Burzynski’s patients
——————————————————————
In the 2nd segment of USA TODAY’s yellow journalism “hit-piece,” the reader was advised that Burzynski had treated [3]:
——————————————————————
“ . . . more than 8,000 patients since 1977.”
——————————————————————
Physician Jeanine Graf, “says she has treated at least a dozen of Burzynski’smore than 8,000 patients,”

This means that Dr. Graf has treated LESS THAN 0.15% of Burzynski’s patients
——————————————————————
The article indicates that:
——————————————————————
“Typically, Graf sees Burzynski’s patients after they have become unresponsive, unable to open their eyes or breathe on their own”

“Graf says she’s never seen Burzynski attending to them”
——————————————————————
Why would she ?

Does she ride in the ambulance to and from the clinic ?

As the article makes clear:

“While Burzynski often meets patients on their first trip to the clinic, Jaffe said he is

“not the treating physician of the clinic’s patients”

“The doctors on Burzynski’s staff have admitting privileges at local hospitals and “attend to patients as needed,” Jaffe said”
——————————————————————
And she continues:
——————————————————————
“And describing her personal experience with Burzynski’s patients, Graf says,”

“I’ve never seen one survive long-term.”
——————————————————————
Are we supposed to believe that pediatric physician Jeanine Graf keeps track of the “more than 8,000 patients” that the article claims Burzynski has treated ?
——————————————————————
Continuing on, the article also claims:
——————————————————————
“The unlucky ones end up broke, spending everything on medicine, airfare, hotel rooms and meals while in Houston, Graf says

“Burzynski’s attorney, Richard Jaffe, notes that all cancer care is expensive”

“I think the clinic’s policies are a lot more charitable than the big institutions,” Jaffe says”
——————————————————————
6/25/2013 – Medical Bills Are the Biggest Cause of US Bankruptcies [4]

“Bankruptcies resulting from unpaid medical bills will affect nearly 2 million people this year—making health care the No. 1 cause of such filings . . . according to new data”

“. . . estimates that households containing 1.7 million people will file for bankruptcy protection this year

“Even outside of bankruptcy, about 56 million adultsmore than 20 percent of the population between the ages of 19 and 64—will still struggle with health-care-related bills this year . . .”

“Despite the anticipated 2013 dip, such bankruptcies represent about three out of every five filings
——————————————————————
2007 – How Many Americans Go Bankrupt Due to Medical Purposes Each Year? [5]

“2007, a Harvard study shows that at least 60% of bankruptcies are related to medical bills

“Even people with health insurance are filing bankruptcy”

“Insurance premiums, deductibles, co-pay, and out of pocket expenses cause medical bills to drown individuals and families in medical debt”

“Harvard also discovered that 75% of those filing bankruptcy for medical reasons had health insurance

“It is clear that having health insurance is no guarantee against carrying debt related to health care”
——————————————————————
Burzynski has treated more than 8,000 patients since 1977

8,000 divided by 36 years equals an average of:

222 patients per year

Burzynski is obviously NOT the problem
——————————————————————
Liz Szabo, Michael Stravato, Jerry Mosemak, and Robert Hanashiro

Don’t quit your day jobs

USA TODAY needs to generate readership somehow !!!
——————————————————————
Sarcasm . . . deal with it
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – 11/15/2013
——————————————————————
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/jeanine-graf-cancer-children/2994675/
======================================
[2]Hannah’s Anectdote:
——————————————————————

======================================
[3] – 11/16/2013 – Critiquing: Doctor accused of selling false hope to families (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY):
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/16/httpwww-usatoday-comstorynewsnation20131115stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy2994561/
======================================
[4] – 06/25/13 2:29 PM ET—By CNBC’s Dan Mangan @danpostman
——————————————————————
http://www.cnbc.com/id/100840148
======================================
[5] – 2007 – Written by James Hirby | Fact checked by The Law Dictionary staff
——————————————————————
http://thelawdictionary.org/article/how-many-americans-go-bankrupt-due-to-medical-purposes-each-year/
======================================

20131116-002818.jpg

Critiquing: Doctor accused of selling false hope to families (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY)

20131116-002847.jpg
I gave Liz Szabo and USA TODAY the chance to act like a Spike Lee joint and “Do the Right Thing”, the same day their article came out [1]

I gave them the opportunity to prove that their article was a legitimate piece of journalism with some semblance of integrity, and NOT just akin to one of “The Skeptics™ phoned-in “rubber-stamped” yellow journalism hit pieces

Instead, it seems that Liz Szabo and / or USA TODAY decided to act as if they had rolled a Spike Lee joint

I sent an e-mail with 2 editorial corrections, and only one (correcting Lisa Merritt’s comment
link from taking the reader to the 1999 Mayo Clinic report instead of to her comments), was corrected [2]

The 2nd correction which they #FAILED to do, earns them well deserved INSOLENCE
——————————————————————
The article claims:
——————————————————————
Burzynski, 70, calls his drugs “antineoplastons” and says he has given them to more than 8,000 patients since 1977.”
——————————————————————

20131116-004037.jpg
——————————————————————
However, if you select the “8,000 patients” link, the referenced page does NOT indicate that at all [2]
——————————————————————

20131116-064344.jpg
——————————————————————
It advises:
——————————————————————
“That same year, Dr. Burzynski founded his clinic in Houston where he’s since treated over 8,000 patients.” [3]
——————————————————————

20131116-064326.jpg
——————————————————————
Nowhere does it indicate that he “treated 8,000 patients” with antineoplastons
——————————————————————

20131116-064409.jpg
——————————————————————
The question that Liz Szabo and USA TODAY should answer, is:

1. Who is your “fact-checker”, and
2. are they smarter than a 5th grader ?
——————————————————————
In fact, Burzynski’s 2002 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing advises:

” … in 1997, his medical practice was expanded to include traditional cancer treatment options such as chemotherapy, gene targeted therapy, immunotherapy and hormonal therapy in response to FDA requirements that cancer patients utilize more traditional cancer treatment options in order to be eligible to participate in the Company’s Antineoplaston clinical trials” [4]
——————————————————————
The article continues:
——————————————————————
“Individual success stories can be misleading, said Arthur Caplan, a professor and head of the division of bioethics at NYU Langone Medical Center”
——————————————————————
The question Arthur Caplan should be asking is:

Why has the United States Food and Drug Administration required Burzynski’s clinical trial patients to fail conventional therapies; such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, BEFORE they are allowed to be treated with antineoplaston therapy ?

If the F.D.A. did NOT impose these restrictions upon Burzynski’s clinical trials, then the question Arthur Caplan raises would be moot
——————————————————————
The article quotes Dr. Jan Buckner as saying:
——————————————————————
“When I hear a story that is way out of the norm, the first question I ask is,

‘OK, is the diagnosis even correct?‘ ”

Buckner said”

“If the diagnosis wasn’t right to start with, it doesn’t matter what the treatment was.”

“Brain tumors are notoriously difficult to diagnose, Buckner says”

“When dealing with rare brain cancer, doctors may disagree about how to interpret imaging results up to 40% of the time”
——————————————————————
I wonder if Dr. Jan Buckner would agree with David Gorski; who is a BREAST cancer oncology specialist, and NOT a BRAIN cancer oncology specialist, who has the presumptiveness to speculate that 3 different medical opinions could have misdiagnosed Tori Moreno in August 1998; who was diagnosed with a very large tumor, about 3 inches in the largest diameter and located in the brain stem, which was too risky for surgery, and about which her parents were told by ALL 3, that Tori’s brain cancer was fatal and, she would die in a few days or at the most, 2-6 weeks, and that there was nothing that could be done, and was finally put on Burzynski’s antineoplaston therapy in October, when she was about 3 ½ months old, and in such condition that they were afraid that she might die at any time, David H. Gorski, M.D., Ph.D., FACS; who claims, “I do know cancer science” , has the audacity, because of his “book learnin'” has the temerity to postulate his “science-based medicine theory” that Miller’s Children at Long Beach Memorial misdiagnosed Tori Moreno’s inoperable stage 4 BSG

David Gorski has the gall to profer that City of Hope misdiagnosed Tori Moreno’s inoperable stage 4 brain stem glioma

David Gorski has the chutzpah to pontificate that Dr. Fred Epstein in New York misdiagnosed Tori Moreno’s inoperable stage IV brainstem glioma [5]
——————————————————————
The article then quotes Peter Adamson, chair of the Children’s Oncology Group:
——————————————————————
“But these therapies may have delayed benefits, taking weeks or months to shrink a tumor

“So patients treated by Burzynski may credit him for their progress, just because he was the last doctor to treat them, says Peter Adamson, chair of the Children’s Oncology Group, an NCI-supported research network that conducts clinical trials in pediatric cancer

Conventional cancer treatment can also cause tumors to swell temporarily, due to inflammation

“A patient who isn’t familiar with this phenomenon may assume her tumor is growing

“When that swelling subsides, patients may assume it’s because of Burzynski, Adamson says”
——————————————————————
This is laughable

In support of this “phenomenon” , the article provides a link to a Canadian web-site [6]

The site posits:
——————————————————————
“RT/TMZ is now widely practiced and the standard of care for appropriately selected patients, we are learning more about the consequences of RT/TMZ”

“One phenomena, termed Pseudo-Progression (psPD)…”
——————————————————————
The problem is that this only applies to “Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM)”, and the article provides NO proof whatsoever, that any of Burzynski’s “Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM)” patients have taken “RT/TMZ”
——————————————————————
Additionally, the site cites the reference as:

Sanghera, Perry, Sahgal, et al., “Sunnybrook Health Sciences Odette Cancer Centre” (in press, Canadian Journal of Neuroscience)

(“In press” refers to journal articles which have been accepted for publication, but have not yet been published)

However, the journal article in question was published 1/2010, so it has NOT been “in press” for over 3 years and 7 months [7]

Get your act together, aye, Canada !
——————————————————————
The article rants and raves on and on about FDA inspection reports from as far back as 1998, but at least they did quote Richard A. Jaffe:

“In Burzynski’s defense, Jaffe notes that inspection reports represent preliminary findings

“The FDA has not yet issued final conclusions”
——————————————————————
The article posts this ridiculous claim:
——————————————————————
“Yet the National Cancer Institute says there is no evidence that Burzynski has cured a single patient, or even helped one live longer
——————————————————————
That’s NOT what this seems to suggest [8]
——————————————————————
Then the article quotes pediatric oncologist Peter Adamson, a professor of pediatrics and pharmacology at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, in what will no doubt soon be known as a “classic”:
——————————————————————
“He’s a snake oil salesman,” says pediatric oncologist Peter Adamson, a professor of pediatrics and pharmacology at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia”
——————————————————————
All I’d like to know is, which rock did this clown crawl out from under ?

Dr. Adamson, please advise which “snake oil” has been granted Orphan Drug Designation (“ODD”) from the United States Food and Drug Administration [9], and which “snake oil” has been approved for, and used in, phase III clinical trials ? [10]
——————————————————————
Q: Is it, it the phase 2 trial is finished ?

A: “Mhmm”

Q: but they’re still accepting people ?

A: “Yeah”

Q: on more like a special ?

A: Special basis, and, um, sometimes compassionate grounds

A: “(compassion exception)”

A: “Uh, exceptions

Q: That’s normal ?

A: “Yes”
“So”

A: “(Yes I guess it is a funding issue ?)”

Q: Right

A: “(Like FDA, during the 2nd phase of clinical trials they found the data to be, real, real one, and they gave him the ok to go for 3rd phase of clinical trials, but just to go through this process you would probably need $100,000)”
——————————————————————

20131116-164617.jpg

20131021-200529.jpg

20131021-200553.jpg
——————————————————————
Oh, wait !!

Dr. Adamson, when you say “snake oil”, I take it you are referring to the low-dose chemotherapy that Burzynski uses ?

Dr. Adamson, do you know what a “hack” is ?
——————————————————————
In regards to the Merritt’s, the article has:
——————————————————————
“The couple say that Burzynski misled them about the type of treatment that would be offered, as well as the cost”

My questions about the Merritt’s are:

1. Where is their complaint to the Texas Medical Board ?

2. Where is their lawsuit ? Couldn’t they find an attorney to take their case pro bono ?
——————————————————————
The article continues:
——————————————————————
“Yet even Jaffe has acknowledged that the trialnow in its 17th year — was more about politics than science”

“In his 2008 memoirs, Galileo’s Lawyer, Jaffe called it “a joke.”

“”It was all an artifice, a vehicle we and the FDA created to legally give the patients Burzynski’s treatment,” Jaffe said
——————————————————————
What Liz Szabo and her friends at USA TODAY fail to let the readers know, is that this only applied to one trial:
——————————————————————
Burzynski’s lawyer is obviously referring to the CAN-1 clinical trial mentioned in Burzynski’s 11/25/1997 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing [11]
——————————————————————
One trial that is retrospective is CAN-1 Clinical Trial
——————————————————————
CAN-1 PHASE II STUDY OF ANTINEOPLASTONS A10 AND AS2-1 IN

PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY MALIGNANCIES

133 patients
——————————————————————
Clinical trial of patients treated by Dr. Burzynski through 2/23/1996
——————————————————————
FDA has indicated it will not accept data generated by this trial since it was not a wholly prospective one
——————————————————————
The article continues in the same vein:
——————————————————————
“In an interview, Burzynski said developing new drugs is complex and takes time

“Yet the FDA has approved 108 cancer drugs since Burzynski began his trial”
——————————————————————
Ms. Szabo and “pals” conveniently “forgets” to educate their audience that Burzynski was using Fleming’s One-sample multiple testing procedure for phase II clinical trials [13], which requires that if the 1st 20 patients meet certain criteria, 20 additional patients are added [14]
——————————————————————
“Well, we cannot publish until the time is right” (laughs)

Yeah

“If you would like to publish the results of, of a
10 year survival, for instance”

Mmm

“Which we have
Nobody has over 10 year survival in
malignant brain tumor, but we do, and if you like to do it right, it takes time to prepare it, and that’s what we do now
What we publish so far
We publish numerous, uh, publications which were, interim reports when we are still continuing clinical trials
Now we are preparing, a number of publications for final reports
[15]
——————————————————————
Then Fran Visco, president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition makes an outlandish statement, which is quoted in the article:
——————————————————————
“Fran Visco, president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition, describes the FDA’s tolerance of Burzynski as “outrageous.”

“They have put people at risk for a long time,” says Visco, an attorney and breast cancer survivor

“That’s completely unacceptable”

“How can anyone look at these facts and believe that there is a real clinical trial going on … rather than just using the FDA and the clinical trial system to make money?”
——————————————————————
I have a suggestion for Ms. Visco

Take your hypocrisy and ask the American Cancer Society if they are still engaged in this kind of activity:

1. AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: More Interested In Accumulating Wealth Than Saving Lives [15]

2. National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society: Criminal Indifference to Cancer Prevention and Conflicts of Interest [16]
——————————————————————
Then, ask the American Cancer Society, why is it that 10 years ago, estimated breast cancer deaths were expected to be 39,800 (15%), and this year it was 39,620 (14%), which is ONLY 180 LESS than 10 years ago ?
——————————————————————
Estimated Breast Cancer Deaths (Women)-USA
——————————————————————
2013☝39,620 (14%)
2012👇39,510 (14%)
2011👇39,520 (15%)
2010👇39,840 (15%)
2009👇40,170 (15%)
2008☝40,480 (15%)
2007👇40,460 (15%)
2006☝40,970 (15%)
2005👇40,410 (15%)
2004☝40,110 (15%)
2003☝39,800 (15%)
2002
39,600 (15%)
—————————————————————–
American Cancer Society Cancer Facts & Figures (2002-2013)
—————————————————————–
And then ask the American Cancer Society, why is it that 10 years ago, the estimated NEW breast cancer cases were expected to be 211,300 (32%), and this year it was 232,340 (29%), which is 21,340 MORE than it was 10 years ago ?
——————————————————————
Estimated New Breast Cancer (Women) – USA
——————————————————————
2013☝232,340 (29%)
2012👇226,870 (29%)
2011☝238,480 (30%)
2010☝207,090 (28%)
2009☝192,370 (27%)
2008☝182,460 (26%)

2007👇178,480 (26%)
2006☝212,920 (31%)
2005👇211,240 (32%)
2004☝215,900 (32%)
2003☝211,300 (32%)
2002
_-_203,500 (31%)
—————————————————————–
American Cancer Society Cancer Facts & Figures (2002-2013)
——————————————————————
And after that, ask Susan G. Komen how much is spent on legal action to protect her brand, compared to how much is spent on breast cancer research and prevention ?
——————————————————————
Visco, the breast cancer advocate

“I do NOT know why it took YOU so long.”
——————————————————————
The article continues with:
——————————————————————
“Yet hypernatremia is one of antineoplastons’ most common side effects, known to doctors for two decades”
——————————————————————
Yet, “The Skeptics™” refuse to discuss:
——————————————————————
2/13/2013 – The frequency, cost, and clinical outcomes of hypernatremia in patients hospitalized to a comprehensive cancer center

Over 3 month period in 2006 re 3,446 patients, most of the hypernatremia (90 %) was acquired during hospital stay [19]

Division of Internal Medicine, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

Department of General Internal Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Division of Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic
——————————————————————
9/1999 – The changing pattern of hypernatremia in hospitalized children [20]

Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
——————————————————————
So, after all that, my question for USA TODAY is, does Liz Szabo, Michael Stravato, Jerry Mosemak or Robert Hanashiro have a
journalism degree ?

Because if any of them do, the institution they obtained it from most be so proud of this piece of “fish wrap” you produced

Thank you, USA TODAY, for censoring my 18 comments

I guess you must be (“intellectual”) cowards

At least Forbes had the GRAPEFRUITS to post some of my comments
——————————————————————
You’ve just been served, INSOLENTLY
——————————————————————
USA TODAY, GONE TOMORROW
——————————————————————

20131116-084820.jpg

20131116-085357.jpg

20131116-084833.jpg

20131116-084847.jpg

20131116-084909.jpg

20131116-084924.jpg

20131116-084937.jpg

20131116-085152.jpg

20131116-085218.jpg

20131116-085311.jpg

20131116-085436.jpg

20131116-085528.jpg

20131116-085550.jpg

20131116-085608.jpg

20131116-085629.jpg

20131116-084804.jpg

20131116-084745.jpg
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – 11/15/2013 – USA TODAY NEWS, NATION
Doctor accused of selling false hope to families
Liz Szabo, USA TODAY
——————————————————————
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy/2994561/
======================================
[2] – Mayo Clinic – 1999 – report: Lisa Merritt
——————————————————————
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/816819-mayo-clinic-1999-report.html
======================================
[3] – 2012 – former Burzynski web-site screenshots, Pg 3 of 62;
——————————————————————
http://www.circare.org/info/bri/burzynski_fdauntitled_promo_2012.pdf
======================================
[4] – 4/26/2013 – Burzynski: FDA requirements that cancer patients utilize more traditional cancer treatment options in order to be eligible to participate in the Company’s Antineoplaston CLINICAL TRIALS:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/burzynski-fda-requirements-that-cancer-patients-utilize-more-traditional-cancer-treatment-options-in-order-to-be-eligible-to-participate-in-the-companys-antineoplaston-clinical-trials/
======================================
[5] – 11/14/2013 – Critiquing: Why we fight for patients (Why we fight your patience) TAM 2013, TAM2013, “The Amazing Meeting” 2013 #TAM2013 http://www.theamazingmeeting.com
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/tam-2013-tam2013-tam2013-the-amazing-meeting-2013-the-amazing-meeting-httptheamazingmeeting-com-httpwww-theamazingmeeting-com/
======================================
[6] – Phenomenon – Brain Tumour Foundation of Canada
——————————————————————
http://www.braintumour.ca/1649/ask-the-expert-psuedo-progression-gbm
======================================
[7] – Pseudoprogression following chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme
Can J Neurol Sci. 2010 Jan;37(1):36-42
——————————————————————
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20169771/
======================================
[8] – 9/19/2013 – Critiquing: National Cancer Institute (NCI) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) CancerNet “fact sheet” :
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/19/critiquing-national-cancer-institute-nci-at-the-national-institutes-of-health-nih-cancernet/
======================================
[9] – FDA Orphan Drug Designation
——————————————————————
http://www.burzynskiresearch.com/assets/PressRelease_12022008_BZYR(2).pdf
======================================
[10] – 11/7/2013Pete Cohen chats with Sonali Patil, Ph.D., Research Scientist at The Burzynski Clinic:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/07/pete-cohen-chats-with-sonali-patil-ph-d-research-scientist-at-the-burzynski-clinic/
======================================
[11] – 7/9/2013 – Burzynski: The Original 72 Phase II Clinical Trials:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/burzynski-the-original-72-phase-ii-clinical-trials/
======================================
[12] – 8/21/2013 – Critiquing David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/editorial-staff/david-h-gorski-md-phd-managing-editor/
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/critiquing-david-h-gorski-md-phd-facs-www-sciencebasedmedicine-orgeditorial-staffdavid-h-gorski-md-phd-managing-editor/
======================================
[13] – 2003 – pg. 94
——————————————————————
http://www.burzynskiclinic.com/images/stories/Publications/960.pdf
======================================
[14] – 3/1982 – Biometrics 1982; 38: 143-51
——————————————————————
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7082756/
======================================
[15] – 11/9/2013Pete Cohen chats with Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski – Interview #2:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/09/pete-cohen-chats-with-dr-stanislaw-burzynski-interwiew-2/
======================================
[16] – AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY: More Interested In Accumulating Wealth Than Saving Lives
——————————————————————
http://www.wnho.net/acs.pdf
======================================
[17] – 9/11/2013 – National Cancer Institute and American Cancer Society: Criminal Indifference to Cancer Prevention and Conflicts of Interest:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/national-cancer-institute-and-american-cancer-society-criminal-indifference-to-cancer-prevention-and-conflicts-of-interest/
—————————————————————
[18] – 11/13/2013 – The War on Cancer (I don’t think it means, what you think it says it means) #Winning?
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/13/httpcancer-orgacsgroupscontentepidemiologysurveilancedocumentsdocumentacspc-036845-pdf/
======================================
[19] – 4/24/2013 – Burzynski: HYPERNATREMIA:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/24/burzynski-hypernatremia/
======================================
[20] – 9/1999 – Pediatrics. 1999 Sep;104(3 Pt 1):435-9
——————————————————————
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10469766/
======================================

20131116-002912.jpg

“The Skeptics™” Mark McAndrew is Trollolo

20131025-023211.jpg
“The Skeptics™” Mark McAndrew #whining on “The Telegraph” while citing Guy Chapman’s blog, claims I shouldn’t be citing my own blog, but he does NOT have any problem whatsoever with his Skeptic guy friend, Guy Chapman, citing HIS own blog

HYPOCRITE

This is why I’m Hipocritical of “The Skeptics™”

Hipocritical
Hippocrates
Hypocrite
critical
critic

Mark McAndrew citing Guy Chapman’s (blahg) blog

20131025-023055.jpg
Guy Chapman citing his own (blahg) blog TWICE

20131025-022922.jpg
Guy Chapman citing his own (blahg) blog TWICE

20131025-022943.jpg
Guy Chapman citing his own (blahg) blog

20131025-023000.jpg
Guy Chapman citing his own (blahg) blog

20131025-023018.jpg

20131025-023037.jpg
Note below, how the moderator leaves my comment as “This comment is awaiting moderation. Show comment”, so that the reader has to select “Show comment” in order to see my reply

20131025-023134.jpg

20131023-193549.jpg
Guy Chapman

All of homeopathy, or just the imponderables?
——————————————————————
Didymus Judas Thomas

Mr. Chapman, I’m quite surprised that you’ve been mum about this particular Homeopathy publication on PubMed?

Cell Biochem Funct. 2013 Feb 13. doi: 10.1002/cbf.2960
[Epub ahead of print]

Stimulation of natural killer cells for homoeopathic complexes: An in vitro and in vivo pilot study in advanced cancer patients.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408699/
Guy Chapman does NOT want to acknowledge that this publication exists

20131023-181712.jpg
Note below, Mark McAndrew’s comment which gets deleted

20131023-182313.jpg

20131025-023115.jpg
Mark McAndrew, you must be the Troll under the bridge that people have to cross to get to the party

20131025-105643.jpg
#8 – Mark McAndrew – October 22, 2013

Thanks Orac, great takedown

Perhaps you should ask the Telegraph for right of reply?

As a real oncologist (whose entire profession is under attack by these pricks) you have the moral authority to demand it

Comments were fun tho

Although debating the spectacular embarrassment that is Sandra Courtney was a bit like going ten rounds with a propped-up corpse

Good exercise, but not exactly testing

Nor hygienic

BTW, lilady, you’ve accidently upvoted one of the Demented One’s posts, the entirely non-ironic

“I think I have exposed your and other skeptics’ credibility as well

Actually, better than you think you have tarnished mine

More batty arrogance on display.”

(Is it true she reckons magic water saved her life from mercury poisoning from her fillings?

Gods, what a freak!)

20131026-125644.jpg
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – “The Skeptics™” Bum Rush “The Telegraph” (@Telegraph): I Feel Empowered, In Control Of My Body: Four Women On Fighting Cancer With Alternative Therapies http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10383724/I-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies.html
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/the-telegraph-telegraph-i-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies/
======================================
[2] – Bias Biased “The Telegraph” Censor “Telegraph” Censors “The Daily Telegraph” Censored “The Sunday Telegraph” Censoring Censorship (@Telegraph): I Feel Empowered, In Control Of My Body: Four Women On Fighting Cancer With Alternative Therapies http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10383724/I-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies.html
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/25/bias-biased-the-telegraph-censor-telegraph-censors-the-daily-telegraph-censored-the-sunday-telegraph-censoring-censorship/

20131025-023156.jpg

Bias Biased “The Telegraph” Censor “Telegraph” Censors “The Daily Telegraph” Censored “The Sunday Telegraph” Censoring Censorship (@Telegraph): I Feel Empowered, In Control Of My Body: Four Women On Fighting Cancer With Alternative Therapies http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10383724/I-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies.html

20131025-022751.jpg
====================================
“The Skeptics™” – comments
——————————————————————
50 – Guy Chapman (1 – awaiting moderation): 1st person to comment
48 – Mark McAndrew (2 – deleted): 3rd person to comment
6 – Margaret Hardman
5 – lilady, R.N.
5 – anarchic teapot
3 – Adam Jacobs – 6th person to comment
4 – edith prickly (1 – deleted)
3 – jrtmedic
I – JGC
1 – AlanHenness
I – David Doran
1 – DoreeenParsons
I – Stephen Tonkin
I – skepticat
I – Tara
——————————————————————
(1 – awaiting moderation: Guy Chapman)
——————————————————————
(2 – deleted: Mark McAndrew)
(1 – deleted: edith prickly)
——————————————————————
131 – TOTAL (“The Skeptics™”)
====================================
Questioning “The Skeptics™” – comments
——————————————————————
42 – Sandra Courtney (6 – deleted): (3 – awaiting moderation)
13 – ReallyGoodMedicine (1 – awaiting moderation)
3 – Didymus Judas Thomas (1 – deleted): (1 – awaiting moderation)
3 – Gillian23 (1 – deleted)
2 – Jonnybones (1 – deleted)
1 – margretnewman (1 – awaiting moderation)
——————————————————————
(3 – awaiting moderation: Sandra Courtney)
(1 – awaiting moderation: ReallyGoodMedicine)
(1 – awaiting moderation: Didymus Judas Thomas)
(1 – awaiting moderation: margretnewman)
——————————————————————
(6 – deleted: Sandra Courtney)
(1 – deleted: Didymus Judas Thomas)
(1 – deleted: Gillian23)
(1 – deleted: Jonnybones)
——————————————————————
63 – TOTAL (Questioning “The Skeptics™”)
====================================
NEUTRAL
——————————————————————
1 – louise40
1 – Xassandra
1 – lordmuck
——————————————————————
3 – TOTAL (NEUTRAL)
====================================
I – deleted (by unknown)
——————————————————————
1 – TOTAL (deleted / unknown)
====================================
198 – TOTAL
——————————————————————
4 – censored *
——————————————————————
202 comments – TOTAL
====================================
131 – TOTAL (“The Skeptics™”)
63 – TOTAL (Questioning “The Skeptics™”)
3 – TOTAL (NEUTRAL)
1 – TOTAL (deleted / unknown)
——————————————————————
198 – TOTAL
——————————————————————
4 – censored *
——————————————————————
202 comments – TOTAL
====================================
* – at least 10 of Didymus Judas Thomas’ comments were censored
====================================
REFERENCES:
====================================
“The Skeptics™” Bum Rush “The Telegraph” (@Telegraph): I Feel Empowered, In Control Of My Body: Four Women On Fighting Cancer With Alternative Therapies http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10383724/I-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies.html
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/the-telegraph-telegraph-i-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies/
====================================
“The Sunday Telegraph,” “The Daily Telegraph,” “The Telegraph,” will you learn how “The Skeptics™” operate like Forbes did ? The Big 3: Articles, Bias, Biased, Censor, Censors, Censored, Censoring, Censorship:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/24/the-sunday-telegraph-the-daily-telegraph-the-telegraph-will-you-learn-how-the-skeptics-operate-like-forbes-did-the-big-3-artices-bias-biased-censor-censors-censore/
====================================

“The Sunday Telegraph,” “The Daily Telegraph,” “The Telegraph,” will you learn how “The Skeptics™” operate like Forbes did ? The Big 3: Articles, Bias, Biased, Censor, Censors, Censored, Censoring, Censorship

20131024-094539.jpg
======================================
DJT – Didymus Judas Thomas
——————————————————————
BB – Bob Blaskiewicz
======================================
1:24:04 [1]
——————————————————————
DJT – I don’t give lame reasons for blocking people on my blog because I’m an American and I actually believe in “Free Speech”
——————————————————————
BB – “Well to be fair”

“It it it doesn’t strike me as necessarily a “Free Speech” issue, you know”
——————————————————————
DJT – Well to me it is when Forbes removes all my comments, in response to Skeptics some, and I showed this from screen-shots [2]

You know, stuff like that
——————————————————————
BB – “Was it down-voted ?”
——————————————————————
DJT – Oh no
——————————————————————
BB – “No”
——————————————————————
DJT – It wasn’t down-voted
——————————————————————
BB“Mhmm”
======================================
Bob, what are you talking about ?

YOU were the 1st person to comment on that article

WHERE is there a “down-vote” option on #Forbes ?
======================================
DJT – They, I mean I’ve got screen-shots of where my comments were there, between other people’s comments, and uh, and they just decided to remove all my comments, and I blogged specifically about, you know, what they did and, uh, Gorski’s good friend and pal who authored that particular article
——————————————————————
BB“Mhmm”
——————————————————————
DJT – SoI, I like how The Skeptics run things, you know [3]
——————————————————————
1:25:14
======================================
Bob, isn’t it nice how your picture is the 3rd one, below ?
======================================
PHARMA & HEALTHCARE | 4/19/2013 @ 9:43PM |2,516 views
A Film Producer, A Cancer Doctor, And Their Critics
106 comments, 4 called-out
Comment Now

20131024-112122.jpg

20131024-094602.jpg

20131024-094626.jpg

20131024-094648.jpg

20131024-094709.jpg

20131024-094838.jpg

20131024-094731.jpg

20131024-094815.jpg

20131024-094753.jpg
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – September 28, 2013 “The Skeptics™” Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/september-28-2013-the-skeptics-burzynski-discussion-by-bob-blaskiewicz-21951/
======================================
[2] – Forbes Learns a Lesson, but Not the Right One: Censorship and Bias re: A Film Producer, A Cancer Doctor, And Their Critics:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/05/forbes-learns-a-lesson-but-not-the-right-one-censorship-and-bias-re-a-film-producer-a-cancer-doctor-and-their-critics/
=====================================
[3] – I Feel Empowered, In Control Of My Body: Four Women On Fighting Cancer With Alternative Therapies:
——————————————————————
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10383724/I-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies.html
======================================

“The Skeptics™” Bum Rush “The Telegraph” (@Telegraph): I Feel Empowered, In Control Of My Body: Four Women On Fighting Cancer With Alternative Therapies http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10383724/I-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies.html

20131023-193612.jpg
I see “The Skeptics™” have descended on The Telegraph [1], just like they did on Forbes [2], and are attempting to “control the conversation” there, in the same manner

“The Skeptics™” LIE, comments get deleted, It’s like Forbes Part II (bias, biased, censor, censors, censored, censoring, censorship)

“The Skeptics™” obviously did NOT learn from their #epic Skeptic #fail #failure there

I wonder if “The Skeptics™” have taken a peek at #Forbes and seen that some of my comments which were removed, now have reappeared, as media sources find out how “The Skeptics™” operate ?

I also see that “The Skeptics™” fave oncologist has commented on the article and one of “The Skeptics™” has tried to get their Lord and Master, The King of “The Skeptics™” #epic Skeptic #fail #failure Disaster to join him in the pollution of another media source [3]

20131023-193510.jpg
Mark McAndrew

Three people here have posted the link to Doctor Gorski’s response to this actual article

About as on-topic as it gets – and not their own work either

You, on the other hand, have spammed at least 12 people here with the exact same link to the “Didymus Judas Thomas’ Hipocritical Oath Blog” (sic), which – surprise – has absolutely nothing to do with this article

Is 12 less or more than 3, Diddy?

Who’s the liar?

20131023-193531.jpg
Mr. McAndrew, did you get screenshots?

I only counted 10, which was provided because it backs up my comments

As far as who has posted your fave oncologist’s link

4 – Mark McAndrew
2 – lilady, R.N.
1 – Margaret Hardman
1 – David Doran

Do I really need to list the # of times Guy Chapman has cited his own blog?

And you were on your fave oncologist’s blog trying to get him to post here

Difference without a distinction

Guten Tag 🙂

DJT, USA

20131023-193207.jpg
Mr. McAndrew, why don’t you ask your fave oncologist to reveal who I am so that I can prove him wrong?

Then you can try and prove that I work for the clinic after I prove him wrong

Problem solved

See how easy that is?

And you don’t end up looking like the
proverbial “village idiot” like one of “The Skeptics” who posts things without “fact-checking” them

I enjoy taking screenshots of my posts

Do you?

Sayanora

DJT, USA

20131023-193549.jpg
Guy Chapman

All of homeopathy, or just the imponderables?
——————————————————————
Didymus Judas Thomas

Mr. Chapman, I’m quite surprised that you’ve been mum about this particular Homeopathy publication on PubMed?

Cell Biochem Funct. 2013 Feb 13. doi: 10.1002/cbf.2960
[Epub ahead of print]

Stimulation of natural killer cells for homoeopathic complexes: An in vitro and in vivo pilot study in advanced cancer patients.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408699/

20131023-181712.jpg

20131023-182313.jpg
1. Mark McAndrew citing Dr. David H. (“Orac”) Gorski’s Respectful Insolence blog

20131023-182101.jpg

20131023-193349.jpg
2. Mark McAndrew citing Dr. David H. (“Orac”) Gorski’s Respectful Insolence blog

20131023-193226.jpg
3. Mark McAndrew citing Dr. David H. (“Orac”) Gorski’s Respectful Insolence blog

20131023-193248.jpg
4. Mark McAndrew citing Dr. David H. (“Orac”) Gorski’s Respectful Insolence blog

20131023-193328.jpg
1. lilady, R.N. citing Dr. David H. (“Orac”) Gorski’s Respectful Insolence blog

20131023-193308.jpg
2. lilady, R.N. citing Dr. David H. (“Orac”) Gorski’s Respectful Insolence blog

20131023-193448.jpg
Margaret Hardman citing Dr. David H. (“Orac”) Gorski’s Respectful Insolence blog

20131023-193410.jpg

20131023-181619.jpg

20131023-184841.jpg
David Doran citing Dr. David H. (“Orac”) Gorski’s Respectful Insolence blog

20131023-181553.jpg

20131023-193429.jpg

20131023-181644.jpg

20131023-184815.jpg

20131023-181802.jpg

20131023-182243.jpg

20131023-181833.jpg

20131023-184903.jpg

20131023-181902.jpg

20131023-190553.jpg

20131023-181930.jpg

20131023-182031.jpg

20131023-190624.jpg

20131023-182132.jpg

20131023-182213.jpg

20131023-190518.jpg

20131023-190646.jpg

20131023-190718.jpg

20131023-191807.jpg

20131023-191829.jpg

20131023-191856.jpg

20131023-193115.jpg

20131023-193145.jpg
=====================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – I Feel Empowered, In Control Of My Body: Four Women On Fighting Cancer With Alternative Therapies:
——————————————————————
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10383724/I-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies.html
======================================
[2] – Forbes Learns a Lesson, but Not the Right One: Censorship and Bias re: A Film Producer, A Cancer Doctor, And Their Critics:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/05/forbes-learns-a-lesson-but-not-the-right-one-censorship-and-bias-re-a-film-producer-a-cancer-doctor-and-their-critics/
======================================
[3] –

——————————————————————
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/10/22/four-misleading-cancer-testimonials-and-reverse-balance/
======================================

David H. Gorski, M.D., Ph.D., FACS (“Orac”) GorskGeek’s articles

This is linked to:

Critiquing: Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski’s cancer “success” stories | Didymus Judas Thomas’ Hipocritical Oath Blog
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/02/critiquing-dr-stanislaw-burzynskis-cancer-success-stories/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
The MicHigANDers 12 days of Christmas;
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/12/24/the-michiganders-12-days-of-christmas/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Talk to the Hand: The #Fail of Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center, Cancer Committee, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center, Alexander J. Walt Comprehensive Breast Center at the Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center, Breast Cancer Multidisciplinary Team (MDT), Karmanos Cancer Center Michigan Breast Oncology Quality Initiative (MiBOQI) project, Detroit, Michigan, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Graduate Program in Cancer Biology, Detroit, Michigan, Breast Oncology Quality Initiative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, American College of Surgeons Committee on Cancer (ACS CoC), Breast Cancer Biology Program, Institute for Science in Medicine, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ (University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey)-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, Joint Graduate Program in Cell & Developmental Biology at Rutgers University in Piscataway, New Jersey, MetroHealth Medical Center, University of Chicago, Case Western Reserve University / University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, American Board of Surgery, American Society of Clinical Oncology, Conquer Cancer Foundation of ASCO and Breast Cancer Research Foundation, St. Peter’s University Hospital, New Brunswick, New Jersey, Lutheran General Hospital, Park Ridge, Illinois, State of Ohio, State of Michigan, and Science-Based Medicine (SBM):
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/12/21/talk-to-the-hand-the-fail-of-barbara-ann-karmanos-cancer-institute-barbara-ann-karmanos-cancer-center-cancer-committee-barbara-ann-karmanos-cancer-center-alexander-j-walt-comprehensive-breast/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Cancer: It’s what’s Best for Business (WW3 – World War Hypocrisy):
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/cancer-its-whats-good-for-business/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Letter to Congress – Dear CONGRESSPERSON’S NAME: My name is _(Slim Shady)_ and I am one of your constituents:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/12/07/dr-stanislaw-burzynski-usa-today-the-skeptics-letter-to-congress-dear-congresspersons-name-my-name-is-_______-and-i-am-one-of-your-constituents/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski (“GorskGeek’s”) Hannah Bradley Gumby Gabroni Gambit:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/12/06/dr-david-h-orac-gorski-gorskgeeks-hannah-bradley-gabroni-gambit/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Shock and hee-hAW on scienceblogs . com/Insolence:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/29/shock-and-hee-haw-on-scienceblogs-cominsolence/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Turkey Lurkey Thanksgiving Title:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/28/turkey-lurkey-thanksgiving-title/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: Stanislaw Burzynski in USA Today: Abuse of clinical trials and patients versus the ineffectiveness of the FDA and Texas Medical Board (Josia Cotto);
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/20/httpscienceblogs-cominsolence20131115stanislaw-burzynski-in-usa-today-abuse-of-clinical-trials-and-patients-versus-the-ineffectiveness-of-the-fda-and-texas-medical-board-4/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: Stanislaw Burzynski in USA Today: Abuse of clinical trials and patients versus the ineffectiveness of the FDA and Texas Medical Board (swell inflammation phenomenon):
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/20/httpscienceblogs-cominsolence20131115stanislaw-burzynski-in-usa-today-abuse-of-clinical-trials-and-patients-versus-the-ineffectiveness-of-the-fda-and-texas-medical-board-3/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: Stanislaw Burzynski in USA Today: Abuse of clinical trials and patients versus the ineffectiveness of the FDA and Texas Medical Board (Hyperactivity versus Hypernatremia, and Hannah Bradley):
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/19/httpscienceblogs-cominsolence20131115stanislaw-burzynski-in-usa-today-abuse-of-clinical-trials-and-patients-versus-the-ineffectiveness-of-the-fda-and-texas-medical-board-2/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: Stanislaw Burzynski in USA Today: Abuse of clinical trials and patients versus the ineffectiveness of the FDA and Texas Medical Board (Getting Worse is Getting Better):
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/17/httpscienceblogs-cominsolence20131115stanislaw-burzynski-in-usa-today-abuse-of-clinical-trials-and-patients-versus-the-ineffectiveness-of-the-fda-and-texas-medical-board/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: Why we fight for patients (Why we fight your patience) TAM 2013, TAM2013, “The Amazing Meeting” 2013 #TAM2013 http://www.theamazingmeeting.com
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/14/tam-2013-tam2013-tam2013-the-amazing-meeting-2013-the-amazing-meeting-httptheamazingmeeting-com-httpwww-theamazingmeeting-com/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Deconstructing Dr. David H. (Orac) Gorski – September 28, 2013 “The Skeptics™” Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/18/deconstructing-dr-david-h-orac-gorski-september-28-2013-the-skeptics-burzynski-discussion-by-bob-blaskiewicz-21951/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Burzynski: “The Skeptics™” – Harming without Care:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/burzynski-the-skeptics-harming-without-care/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: The Institute of Medicine report on cancer care: Is the system “in crisis”?:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/21/critiquing-the-institute-of-medicine-report-on-cancer-care-is-the-system-in-crisis/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Questioning “The Skeptics™” Colorado Public Television (CPT12) PBS Facebook comments with links:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/questioning-the-skeptics-colorado-public-television-cpt12-pbs-facebook-comments-with-links/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
“The Skeptics™” Colorado Public Television (CPT12) – PBS Facebook comment links:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/14/the-skeptics-colorado-public-television-cpt12-pbs-facebook-comment-links/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
A Critical Analysis of Wikipedia’s “Failure to Communicate”:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/a-critical-analysis-of-wikipedias-failure-to-communicate/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski wins “Noballs” Prize:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/13/dr-david-h-orac-gorski-wins-noballs-prize/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing Wikipedia: Burzynski Clinic, Colorado Public Television (CPT12), and Public Broadcasting System (PBS):
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/critiquing-wikipedia-burzynski-clinic-colorado-public-television-cpt12-and-public-broadcasting-system-pbs/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
FINALLY, one of “The Skeptics™” has the “Balls” to do what even Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski would NOT do:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/finally-one-of-the-skeptics-has-the-balls-to-do-what-even-dr-david-h-orac-gorski-would-not-do/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
A Cancer HackFest on National Geographics’ #NatGeo ScienceBlogs . com/Insolence:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/a-cancer-hackfest-on-national-geographics-natgeo-scienceblogs-cominsolence/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski “Oracolyte” Woo Fighter Poo Biter admits to LYING to “The Guardian”
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/10/dr-david-h-orac-gorski-oracolyte-woo-fighter-poo-biter-admits-to-lying-to-the-guardian/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: Wikipedia – Burzynski Clinic:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/10/critiquing-wikipedia-burzynski-clinic/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Burzynski: The Ministry of Dupes:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/09/burzynski-the-ministry-of-dupes/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Orac’s “Oracolyte” Narad proves he has the research skilz of his “god”:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/08/oracs-oracolyte-narad-proves-he-has-the-research-skilz-of-his-god/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski http://sciencebasedmedicine versus Personalized Treatment at Burzynski Clinic
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/05/personalized-treatment-at-burzynski-clinic-2/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
University of Michigan, where is alum Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski’s Grapefruits ?
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/04/university-of-michigan-where-is-alum-dr-david-h-orac-gorskis-grapefruits/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS, maybe you should check your F-A-C-T-S:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/30/dr-david-h-orac-gorski-md-phd-facs-maybe-you-should-check-your-f-a-c-t-s/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, quickly realized that David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS is NOT doing something wrong when he LIES about Burzynski:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/27/wayne-state-university-detroit-michigan-quickly-realized-that-david-h-gorski-md-phd-facs-is-not-doing-something-wrong-when-he-lies-about-burzynski/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/editorial-staff/david-h-gorski-md-phd-managing-editor/

https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/21/critiquing-david-h-gorski-md-phd-facs-www-sciencebasedmedicine-orgeditorial-staffdavid-h-gorski-md-phd-managing-editor/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing David H. “Orac” Gorski, MD PhD and his Personalized MUD-Targeted Skeptic Therapy:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/17/critiquing-david-h-orac-gorski-md-phd-and-his-personalized-mud-targeted-skeptic-therapy/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Does David H. “Orac” Gorski, M.D., Ph.D, really CARE about Breast Cancer patients?:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/13/does-david-h-orac-gorski-m-d-ph-d-really-care-about-breast-cancer-patients/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
The #Burzynski Skeptics™ are SkeptiScared:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/12/3666/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski and The Skeptics™ http://www.scienceblogs.com/Insolence

https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/08/critiquing-dr-david-h-orac-gorski-and-the-skeptics/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski, M.D., Ph.D, L.I.A.R.:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/07/critiquing-dr-david-h-orac-gorski-m-d-ph-d-l-i-a-r/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing Dr David H. “Orac” Gorski, M.D., Ph.D, LIAR: Stanislaw Burzynski versus the BBC:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/04/critiquing-dr-david-h-orac-gorski-m-d-ph-d-liar-stanislaw-burzynski-versus-the-bbc/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
“Orac” is god, the False god, his “Oracolytes,” and the Cult of MUD:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/07/30/is-dr-david-h-orac-gorski-down-and-out-in-detroit-and-an-ethically-bankrupt-researcher/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Burzynski: Oh, RATS!!!
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/07/26/the-lancet-oncology-peer-review-team-d-12-01519-fail-2/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Is Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski Down and Out in Detroit and an Ethically Bankrupt Researcher ?:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/07/23/is-dr-david-h-orac-gorski-down-and-out-in-detroit-and-an-ethically-bankrupt-researcher-2/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: How Stanislaw Burzynski became Burzynski the Brave Maverick Doctor, part 1:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/07/22/critiquing-how-stanislaw-burzynski-became-burzynski-the-brave-maverick-doctor-part-1/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: In which the latest movie about Stanislaw Burzynski “cancer cure” is reviewed…with Insolence:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/07/18/critiquing-in-which-the-latest-movie-about-stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-cure-is-reviewed-with-insolence-2/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
QUESTIONS the Critics and Cynics, “The Skeptics™” do NOT want to ANSWER | Didymus Judas Thomas’ Hipocritical Oath Blog
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/06/23/questions-the-critics-and-cynics-the-skeptics-do-not-want-to-answer/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
August 15, 1935, A Day That Will Live In Infirmary:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/06/17/august-15-1935-a-day-that-will-live-in-infirmary/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing the #SkepticCanary: “The Skeptics™” (SkeptiCowards©) Bob Blatherskitewicz and the so-called, “self-proclaimed” “CANCER RESEARCHER”:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/06/03/critiquing-the-skepticcanary-the-skeptics-skepticowards-bob-blatherskitewicz-and-the-so-called-self-proclaimed-cancer-researcher/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
“The Skeptics™” Doctor David H. Gorski is one of the “SkeptiCowards©” (I kid you not): Houston, We Have a Problem:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/the-skeptics-doctor-david-h-gorski-is-one-of-the-skepticowards-i-kid-you-not-houston-we-have-a-problem/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Doctor David H. Gorski: This Is Your Life (Brought to you by “Mud” Life–For that refreshing MudBeer taste):
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/29/doctor-david-h-gorski-this-is-your-life-brought-to-you-by-mud-life-for-that-refreshing-mudbeer-taste/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Paging Doctor David H. Gorski, Paging Doctor David H. Gorski: There’s Mud in your Ears … Doktor Gorski?:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/28/paging-doctor-david-h-gorski-paging-doctor-david-h-gorski-theres-mud-in-your-ears-doktor-gorski/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Shall We Play A Game ? “The Skeptics” (SkeptiCowards) vs. “The Skeptics’” Critics #Burzynski The 1st ever “LIE OFF”:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/23/shall-we-play-a-game-the-skeptics-skepticowards-vs-the-skeptics-critics-burzynski-the-1st-ever-lie-off/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: Is Eric Merola issuing bogus DMCA takedown notices against critics of Stanislaw Burzynski?:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/critiquing-is-eric-merola-issuing-bogus-dmca-takedown-notices-against-critics-of-stanislaw-burzynski/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Orac, a lilady, the Oracolytes: “The Skeptic” Burzynski Critics: A Film Producer, A Cancer Doctor, And Their Critics:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/01/orac-a-lilady-the-oracolytes-the-skeptic-burzynski-critics-a-film-producer-a-cancer-doctor-and-their-critics/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
“Orac” and the “Oracolytes” Cult of Misinformation:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/29/orac-and-the-oracolytes/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing “All truth comes from public debate”: A corollary to crank magnetism:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/critiquing-all-truth-comes-from-public-debate-a-corollary-to-crank-magnetism/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
David H. Gorski’s conspiracy-mongering and more of his Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski “stories”:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/david-h-gorskis-conspiracy-mongering-and-more-of-his-dr-stanislaw-burzynski-stories
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
The premature death of “Too many too soon”: Not a moment too soon – “Common sense” that isn’t:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/12/the-premature-death-of-too-many-too-soon-not-a-moment-too-soon-common-sense-that-isnt/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing David H. Gorski – Quackademic Medicine:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/02/critiquing-david-h-gorski-quackademic-medicine/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing the Skeptics re: “Funny how you never see Orac and this person in the same place at the same time”:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/02/critiquing-the-skeptics-re-funny-how-you-never-see-orac-and-this-person-in-the-same-place-at-the-same-time/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing the Critics at Sciencebasedmedicine (Burzynski: Cancer Is A Serious Business, Part 2:):
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/critiquing-the-critics-at-sciencebasedmedicine-burzynski-cancer-is-a-serious-business-part-2/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
“The Skeptics” (Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business, Part II):
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/the-skeptics/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing the Critics on Orac’s Respectful Insolence blog: Part III:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/19/critiquing-the-critics-on-oracs-respectful-insolence-blog-part-iii/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing the Critics on Orac’s Respectful Insolence blog: Part I:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/17/critiquing-the-critics-on-oracs-respectful-insolence-blog-part-i/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
My 1st-hand Review of Orac’s 2nd-Hand Review – Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business, Part II:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/14/my-1st-hand-review-of-oracs-2nd-hand-review-burzynski-cancer-is-serious-business-part-ii/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Orac and the Cult of “Misinformation” (Part III):
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/orac-and-the-cult-of-misinformation-part-iii/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
The Cult of “Misinformation” continued:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/12/the-cult-of-misinformation-continued/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
The Cult of “Misinformation”:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/the-cult-of-misinformation/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
David H. Gorski and the Cult of Misinformation:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/10/david-h-gorski-and-the-cult-of-misinformation/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Critiquing: When is a Skeptic not a Skeptic:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/26/critiquing-when-is-a-skeptic-not-a-skeptic/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
FACTS Burzynski critics do NOT like:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/12/facts-burzynski-critics-do-not-like/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
IMPORTANT: The live “debate” that wasn’t – A Film Producer, A Cancer Doctor, And Their Critics:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/29/important-the-live-debate-that-wasnt-a-film-producer-a-cancer-doctor-and-their-critics/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
IMPORTANT: The live “debate”: A Film Producer, A Cancer Doctor, And Their Critics:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/27/important-the-live-debate-a-film-producer-a-cancer-doctor-and-their-critics/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
My Critique of Orac’s: Stanislaw Burzynski versus regulations protecting human research subjects, revisited:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/27/my-critique-of-oracs-stanislaw-burzynski-versus-regulations-protecting-human-research-subjects-revisited/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Burzynski and AACR (American Association For Cancer Research)
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/burzynski-and-aacr-american-association-for-cancer-research
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Irresponsible Insolence:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/02/19/irresponsible-insolence/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �
Respectful Insolence or Hipocritical Oath:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/02/14/respectful-insolence-or-hipocritical-oath/
� � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �