Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog

Stanislaw Rajmund Burzynski, Stanislaw R. Burzynski, Stanislaw Burzynski, Stan R. Burzynski, Stan Burzynski, S. R. BURZYNSKI, S. Burzynski, Arthur Burzynski, Hippocrates Hypocrite Hypocrites Critic Critics Critical HipoCritical

Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog

Main menu

  • Home
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • 1
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 1998 (1/15/1998)
  • 1999 (2/1999) Volume 74 Number 2 pg. 137 – 3 pgs.
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • About
  • List of Articles

Tag Archives: “carte blanche”

SkeptiCowards© CrowdSource http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/2013/10/a-message-to-a-djt/

Posted on October 31, 2013 by didymusjudasthomas
Reply

20131030-202022.jpg
——————————————————————
[1]
======================================
Woo Fighter – 10/1/2013 – 8:46 pm

“Guy,”

“He also stated quite frankly during the Google Hangout that nothing will ever change his mind”
——————————————————————
Woo, Bob did NOT provide enough evidence that would cause me to “change my mind”
——————————————————————
“So what’s the point of any further discourse?”
——————————————————————
Woo, the point is, it gives you the opportunity to explain why you lied to The Guardian [2]
——————————————————————
“His idea of “debate” is having critics post comments on his blog; whether that is to drive up page views or merely to seek attention we’ll never know”
——————————————————————
Woo, who suggested leaving comments on my blog ?

Bob ? [3]

9/28/2013 Google+ Hangout
——————————————————————
1:13:00
——————————————————————
“Okay, I’ll look at that, and I will respond to it once I’ve taken a look at that, okay ?“

“Um, and I’ll respond on your web-site“

“Um, seems only fair“
——————————————————————
1:14:00
——————————————————————
2:09:00
——————————————————————
“… and don’t worry I will go to your site and I will comment on on on what you’ve run“
——————————————————————
2:10:15
——————————————————————
2:18:00
——————————————————————
“Um, I will look at your web-site, and we will, uh, we, uh, you, oh make sure that I I go to your blog and and I talk there“
——————————————————————
2:19:00
——————————————————————
“What none of us understands is his motivation”

“I have discussed this privately in e-mails with Bob B. and you, Guy”

“When asked about this during the session on Saturday all he said was that he wanted to correct what he perceives as misinformation from Burzynski critics on social media”
——————————————————————
Woo, you’re obviously NOT from Texas

It’s like a whole ‘nother Country

My motivation ?

I am a Texan and an American and I do NOT have any respect for individuals who lie about cancer treatment on social media

Verstehen ?

There’s a saying:

“Don’t mess with Texas”
——————————————————————
“It has to go deeper than that”

“He didn’t wake up one day and out of the blue decide he was going to champion Burzynski”

“He has to have some connection, either personal or commercial”
——————————————————————
Woo, you’re still wrong

Prove it
——————————————————————
“The sheer amount of time and effort he’s pored into writing hundreds, if not thousands of comments on science blogs, his rabid attempts to edit Wikipedia and his own blog posts indicates he something invested”
——————————————————————
Woo, why don’t you count the amount of comments I posted on “Orac’s” Respectful Insolence science blog and let everyone know the results ?
——————————————————————
“He denied he works for Burzynski as he stated he doesn’t even live in Texas anymore, but that is irrelevant”

“I don’t believe Marc Stephens lived in Texas for the duration of time he represented the clinic”
——————————————————————
Woo, who cares what you think about Marc Stephens ?

Prove it
——————————————————————
“I wish he would just be honest and tell us why he has spent devoted so much of his time over the past year (almost) promoting and supporting Burzynski (and Merola, for that matter)”
——————————————————————
Woo, where have I been “promoting and supporting” them ?

Everything on my blog is devoted to showing how “The Skeptics™” lie
——————————————————————
“I was going to say it would be hard to go back to calling him an idiot after hearing him speak on Saturday, as he became humanized”
——————————————————————
Woo, I have no problem calling you an “idiot” after you lied about me [2]
——————————————————————
“His folksy “y’all” and his laughter made him a real person”

“He was no longer just words on a screen, but a living, breathing human being”

“However after seeing the Tweets he posted immediately following the Hangout, where he reverted to his juvenile insults, his name-calling, his inability to write a coherent sentence and his out-and-out lack of respect for people like you and Dr. Gorksi has made me reevaluate my stance”
——————————————————————
Woo, please cite one of these “supposed” Tweets you have a problem with

Surely you did NOT think I was giving Bob carte blanche to continue on Twitter without proving his case ?
——————————————————————
“He simply deserves to be ignored”

“He has a serious personality disorder and doesn’t merit any of our attention ever again”
——————————————————————
Woo, my personality is serious enough NOT to lie about people to The Guardian

Do you have a serious “compulsive liar” personality disorder ?
======================================
Guy Chapman – 10/2/2013 – 12:26 am

“He kind of admitted it when he said that he’d be persuaded by the FDA not having granted phase 3 approval; defining your rejection criteria according to some test whose outcome is already know is one of the techniques used by homeopaths”
——————————————————————
Guy, which homeopathic “remedy” has received Orphan Drug Designation (ODD) and FDA Phase 3 approval ?
——————————————————————
“You do not interpret this thing as I would like, therefore you are denying this thing happened, therefore you lie, is another,”
——————————————————————
Guy, what massive cognitive dissonance dreamworld are you living in ?
======================================
Guy Chapman – 10/2/2013 – 12:28 am

“Actually, we know what he is”

“A troll”

“Why did we let ourselves get sucked in?”
——————————————————————
“Troll” is an excuse cowards use to try and label someone in order to claim that they should NOT be put in a position to do something they agreed to
======================================
IamBreastCancer – 10/2/2013 – 12:27 am

“Excellent summary, Guy”

“I agree with WooFighter that his motivation is suspect, but there are some desperately lonely attention-seeking people out there who will grasp onto any controversial issue just to get “in the game.””

“As a cancer patient myself, I was struck by the fact that he could yammer on for almost 2-1/2 hours without showing a shred of concern or compassion for cancer patients or legitimate cancer treatment questions”

“His behavior before, during and since the debate clearly shows he absolutely has no regard for real facts or evidence”

“I’m thankful that he’s unable to write coherently, as it cripples his capacity for causing harm to cancer patients”

“Unlike so many other charlatans out there, I don’t think he represents much of a threat to patient safety, just a lot of noise and bandwidth waste”

“His 15 minutes of fame needs to end”
——————————————————————
Quidama, I’m sorry you have cancer, but it sounds to me like you seriously need a “reality check”: [4]
——————————————————————
A. Tried to “control the conversation”
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
B. Interrupted the other individual the most:
1. 30+ – Bob Blaskiewicz interrupted DJT
2. (20+ back at ya) – DJT interrupted BB
——————————————————————
C. Asked the most questions:
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
D. Most speaking time:
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
E. Most words:
1. 13,933 – Bob Blaskiewicz
2. 8,847 – DJT
——————————————————————
F. Most characters:
1. 66,123 – Bob Blaskiewicz
2. 43,245 – DJT
——————————————————————
G. Acted as if they were teaching a class, and dictating what your possible responses were, implying that they did NOT consider this to be a “debate” where the participants were free to choose their own responses:
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
H. Proved they do NOT know how to debate
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
I. Proved they do NOT have manners
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
J. Must have thought they were on the Morton Downey Jr. talk show (or do you prefer Jerry Springer ?)
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
K. Controlled themself best:
1.
2. DJT
——————————————————————
L. Did NOT need help from any pro-position pundits
1.
2. DJT
——————————————————————
“Thanks for all you do!”
——————————————————————
You’re welcome

20131031-001645.jpg
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – A message to DJT
——————————————————————
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/2013/10/a-message-to-a-djt/
======================================
[2] – Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski “Oracolyte” Woo Fighter Poo Biter admits to LYING to “The Guardian”:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/10/dr-david-h-orac-gorski-oracolyte-woo-fighter-poo-biter-admits-to-lying-to-the-guardian/
======================================
[3] – Why “The Skeptics™” Perfessor Robert J. (don’t call me “Bobby”) “Bob” Blaskiewicz (@rjblaskiewicz) of University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire, “Fame,” is a Coward and a Liar:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/13/why-the-skeptics-perfessor-robert-j-dont-call-me-bobby-bob-blaskiewicz-rjblaskiewicz-of-university-of-wisconsin-eau-claire-fame-is-a-coward-and-a-liar/
====================================
[4] – Fun Facts From September 28, 2013 “The Skeptics™” Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/07/fun-facts-from-september-28-2013-the-skeptics-burzynski-discussion-by-bob-blaskiewicz-21951/
====================================

Advertisement
Posted in Bob Blaskiewicz (Robert J. Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz), critique, critiques, critiqued, critiquing, FDA, United States Food and Drug Administration, Guy Chapman, Orphan Drug Designation (ODD), The Skeptics, The Telegraph (The Daily Telegraph) | Tagged "9/28/2013 Google+ Hangout", "A Message to DJT", "A Message to Guy “Can’t Git-R-Done” Chapman", "Bob J. Blaskiewicz", "Bobby Blaskiewicz", "control the conversation”, "Dr. David H. Orac Gorski Oracolyte Woo Fighter Poo Biter admits to LYING to The Guardian”, "Eau Claire", "Fun Facts From September 28, "It’s like a whole other Country", "Jerry Springer", "Morton Downey Jr.", "name-calling", "orphan drug designation", "phase 3 approval", "pro-position pundits", "Prove it", "reality check”, "Rob J. Blaskiewicz", "Robert Bob Blaskiewicz", "Robert J. Blaskiewicz", "SkeptiCowards© CrowdSource http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/2013/10/a-message-to-a-djt/", "social media", "The Guardian", "Why The Skeptics™ Perfessor Robert J. (don’t call me Bobby) Bob Blaskiewicz (@rjblaskiewicz) of University of Wisconsin, "Woo Fighter", "You’re Welcome", 2013 The Skeptics™ Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51", @IamBreastCancer, @rjblaskiewicz, @SceptiGuy, @vGuyUK, absolutely, Acted, American, and don’t worry I will go to your site and I will comment on on on what you’ve run“, and I will respond to it once I’ve taken a look at that, and I’ll respond on your web-site“, and we will, attention, attention-seeking", “15 minutes of fame”, “Bob B.", “carte blanche", “change my mind”, “compulsive liar”, “Don’t mess with Texas”, “living breathing human being", “Marc Stephens", “Okay, “Um, bandwidth, BB, behavior, blog, blogs, Bob Blaskiewicz, Burzynski, Cancer, capacity, charlatans, choose, class, clinic, cognitive, coherent, coherently, comments, compassion, concern, Controlled, controversial, cowards, cripples, criteria, Critic, critics, Debate, denied, denying, deserves, desperately, devoted, dictating, discourse, disorder, dissonance, DJT, Dr. Gorksi", dreamworld, duration, Eric Merola, evidence, excuse, F.D.A., FACTS, Fame, FDA, folksy, free, granted, grasp, Guy, Guy Chapman, guychapman, harm, homeopathic, homeopaths, honest, http://chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg, https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/10/dr-david-h-orac-gorski-oracolyte-woo-fighter-poo-biter-admits-to-lying-to-the-guardian/, https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/03/a-message-to-guy-cant-git-r-done-chapman/, https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/07/fun-facts-from-september-28-2013-the-skeptics-burzynski-discussion-by-bob-blaskiewicz-21951/, https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/13/why-the-skeptics-perfessor-robert-j-dont-call-me-bobby-bob-blaskiewicz-rjblaskiewicz-of-university-of-wisconsin-eau-claire-fame-is-a-coward-an, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/2013/10/a-message-to-a-djt/, https://mobile.twitter.com/SceptiGuy, https://mobile.twitter.com/vGuyUK, humanized, I will look at your web-site, I’ll look at that, idiot, ignored, implying, inability, insults, interpret, interrupted, invested, irrelevant, is a Coward and a Liar", juvenile, laughter, legitimate, lie, lied, living, lonely, manners, massive, merit, Merola, misinformation, motivated, Motivation, noise, ODD, oh make sure that I I go to your blog and and I talk there“, Orac, outcome, participants, patients, person, personality, possible", promote, promoting, proved, Questions, Quidama, rabid, real, reevaluate, regard, rejection, remedy, represented, represents, respect, Respectful Insolence, responses, safety, science, seems only fair“, serious, seriously, shred, speaking, stance, sucked, support, supporting, suspect, teaching, techniques, test, Texan, Texas, The Skeptics, threat, treatment, troll, Tweet, tweets, Twitter, uh, Verstehen, waste, we, Wikipedia, Woo, WooFighter, yammer, you | Leave a reply

Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, quickly realized that David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS is NOT doing something wrong when he LIES about Burzynski

Posted on August 27, 2013 by didymusjudasthomas
Reply

March 14, 2013 David Gorski posted on ScienceBasedMedicine . org [1] and ScienceBlogs . com/Insolence [2]

3.

“Merola bemoans how unfair it is (to him) that the FDA is requiring a phase III clinical trials for Burzynski’s antineoplastons and refusing to grant accelerated approval for them, as it did for Temodar and Avastin”

“It seems like a compelling point on the surface if you don’t know about the drug approval process or Burzynski; indeed, The Skeptics who viewed the movie wondered about this claim”

“Here’s what, as far as I can tell from my reports, Merola leaves out”

“Temodar and Avastin both had proper, completed, and published phase II trials before approval”

Does Gorski provide a reference to support his statement ?

“Temodar and Avastin both had proper, completed, and published phase II trials before approval”

NO !

Does he provide a citation ?

NO !!

Does he provide a link ?

NO !!!

Why not ?

Is it because Science Based Medicine . org proclaims:

“Our only goal is to promote high standards of science in medicine” ? [3]

Is it because “Orac” is god ??

Is it because Gorski has proclaimed:

6/5/2013 “ … I do know cancer science”??? [4]

Is it because “Orac” says:

6/7/2013 “Unlike Mr. Merola, I am indeed very concerned with getting my facts correct” ???? [5]

1/1999 Temodar (Temozolomide): received accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treatment of anaplastic astrocytoma (brain cancer) patients [6]

Was the United States Food and Drug Administration’s 1/1999 accelerated approval based on the PUBLISHED FINAL RESULTS OF A PHASE II (2) CLINICAL TRIAL?

The answer is: NO

1/1999 – FDA Accelerated Approval [6]

9/1999 – Phase 2 publication [7]

12/2000 – publication [8]

5/6/2009 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval of Avastin (bevacizumab) for people with glioblastoma (brain cancer) with progressive disease following prior therapy [9]

Was the United States Food and Drug Administration’s 5/6/2009 accelerated approval based on the PUBLISHED FINAL RESULTS OF A PHASE II (2) CLINICAL TRIAL?

.2/10/2009 – 1st arm Phase 2 publication [10]

5/6/2009 – FDA Accelerated Approval [9]

1/1/2010 – 2nd arm publication [11]

The answer is: The 1st arm of the phase 2 clinical trial was published .2/10/2009, before the 5/6/2009 FDA approval, and the 2nd arm was published 1/1/2010, after the FDA approval

So, Gorski has been caught in yet another LIE

But no worries !

5/31/2013 Orac posted:

“Burzynski has a contingent of defenders who have targeted skeptics like me for special abuse, up to and including harassing me at work by calling my university to complain about my online verbiage critical of Burzynski and implying that I am somehow doing something wrong”

“(My university quickly realized that I was not.)” [12]

Gorski obviously has carte blanche to LIE

I wonder what

Wayne State University

Wayne State University School of Medicine

Section of Breast Surgery / Graduate Program in Cancer Biology

Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center / Institute

Alexander J. Walt Comprehensive Breast Center

American College of Surgeons Committee on Cancer

Institute for Science in Medicine

National Geographic

ScienceBlogs . com

and

ScienceBasedMedicine . org

all think of this, knowing that they could become the next

“wretched hive of scum and hackery ?”

David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS,
maybe you should check your FACTS
======================================
[1] Burzynski: Cancer Is A Serious Business, Part 2: Like the first Burzynski movie, only more so?
——————————————————————
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/burzynski-cancer-is-a-serious-business-part-2-like-the-first-burzynski-movie-only-more-so/
======================================
[2] Five things I learned (second hand) from the recent screening of Burzynski: Cancer Is Serious Business, Part 2
——————————————————————
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/03/14/five-things-i-learned-second-hand-from-the-recent-screening-of-burzynski-cancer-is-serious-business-part-2/
======================================
[3] ScienceBasedMedicine Editorial Staff
——————————————————————
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/editorial-staff/
======================================
[4] Odds and Ends about Burzynski Clinic
——————————————————————
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/06/05/odds-and-ends-about-burzynski-clinic/
======================================
[5] I want my ANP
——————————————————————
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/06/07/i-want-my-anp/
======================================
[6] 1/1999 Temodar (Temozolomide): received accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration
——————————————————————
http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/11/19/6767.full
======================================
[7] 9/1999 – Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma at first relapse
Temodal Brain Tumor Group
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10561351/
J Clin Oncol. 1999 Sep;17(9):2762-71.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10561351/
JCO September 1999 vol. 17 no. 9 2762
http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/9/2762.abstract
ERRATA: Correction for vol. 17, p. 2762 JCO Nov 1, 1999:3693
http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/9/2762.long
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA

Click to access 2762.full.pdf

======================================
[8] 12/2000 – Temozolomide and anaplastic astrocytoma:
new indication
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11475493/
Prescrire Int. 2000 Dec;9(50):170-1.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/11475493/
======================================
[9] 5/6/2009 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval of Avastin (bevacizumab)
——————————————————————
http://www.drugs.com/newdrugs/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-avastin-brain-cancer-glioblastoma-has-progressed-following-prior-1342.html
Study AVF3708g
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/druginfo/fda-bevacizumab
Study NCI 06-C-0064E
======================================
[10] .2/10/2009 Phase II Trial of Single-Agent Bevacizumab Followed by Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan at Tumor Progression in Recurrent Glioblastoma
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19114704/
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 10;27(5):740-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3055
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19114704/
Epub 2008 Dec 29
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2645088/
JCO February 10, 2009 vol. 27 no. 5 740-745
http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/5/740
Published online before print December.29, 2008, doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3055
http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/5/740.long
Neuro-Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/5/740.full

Click to access 740.full.pdf

======================================
[11] 1/1/2010 Bevacizumab: in previously treated glioblastoma
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20108991/
Drugs. 2010;70(2):181-9. doi: 10.2165/11203890-000000000-00000
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/20108991/
Drugs January 2010, Volume 70, Issue 2, pp 181-189
http://link.springer.com/article/10.2165%2F11203890-000000000-00000
Adis, a Wolters Kluwer Business, Auckland, New Zealand
======================================
[12] On “helping” that is anything but
——————————————————————
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/05/31/on-helping-that-is-anything-but/
======================================

Posted in critique, critiques, critiqued, critiquing, Gorski ScienceBlogs.com/Insolence ScienceBasedMedicine, research, The Skeptics | Tagged "accelerated approval", "Adis a Wolters Kluwer Business Auckland New Zealand", "Alexander J. Walt Comprehensive Breast Center", "American College of Surgeons Committee on Cancer", "Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center / Institute", "Bevacizumab: in previously treated glioblastoma", "Burzynski: Cancer Is A Serious Business", "David H. Gorski MD PhD FACS", "drug approval process", "Drugs January 2010 Volume 70 Issue 2 pp 181-189", "Drugs. 2010;70(2):181-9. doi: 10.2165/11203890-000000000-00000", "Epub 2008 Dec 29", "ERRATA: Correction for vol. 17 p. 2762 JCO Nov 1 1999:3693", "Five things I learned (second hand) from the recent screening of Burzynski: Cancer Is Serious Business Part 2", "I want my ANP", "Institute for Science in Medicine", "J Clin Oncol. 1999 Sep;17(9):2762-71", "J Clin Oncol. 2009 Feb 10;27(5):740-5. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3055", "JCO February 10 2009 vol. 27 no. 5 740-745", "JCO September 1999 vol. 17 no. 9 2762", "Multicenter phase II trial of temozolomide in patients with ANAPLASTIC ASTROCYTOMA or anaplastic oligoastrocytoma at first relapse", "National Geographic", "Neuro-Oncology Branch National Cancer Institute National Institutes of Health Bethesda MD USA", "Odds and Ends about Burzynski Clinic", "On helping that is anything but", "people with glioblastoma (brain cancer) with progressive disease", "Phase II Trial of Single-Agent Bevacizumab Followed by Bevacizumab Plus Irinotecan at Tumor Progression in Recurrent Glioblastoma", "Prescrire Int. 2000 Dec;9(50):170-1", "PUBLISHED FINAL RESULTS OF A PHASE II (2) CLINICAL TRIAL", "Published online before print December.29, "ScienceBasedMedicine . org", "ScienceBasedMedicine Editorial Staff", "ScienceBlogs . com", "ScienceBlogs . com/Insolence", "Section of Breast Surgery / Graduate Program in Cancer Biology", "Study AVF3708g", "Study NCI 06-C-0064E", "Temodal Brain Tumor Group", "Temozolomide and anaplastic astrocytoma: new indication", "U.S. Food and Drug Administration", "United States Food and Drug Administration", "University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA", "Wayne State University Detroit Michigan, "Wayne State University School of Medicine", "Wayne State University", 2008 doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.3055", antineoplastons, Avastin, “anaplastic astrocytoma (brain cancer) patients", “carte blanche", “wretched hive of scum and hackery ?”, Bevacizumab, F.D.A., FACTS, FDA, http://cancerbiologyprogram.med.wayne.edu/faculty/gorski.php, http://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/11/19/6767.full, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gorski, http://link.springer.com/article/10.216511203890-000000000-00000, http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/9/2762.abstract, http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/9/2762.full.pdf, http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/17/9/2762.long, http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/5/740, http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/5/740.full, http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/5/740.full.pdf, http://m.jco.ascopubs.org/content/27/5/740.long, http://prognosis.med.wayne.edu/article/dr-gorski-named-codirector-of-michigan-breast-oncology-quality-initiative, http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/03/14/five-things-i-learned-second-hand-from-the-recent-screening-of-burzynski-cancer-is-serious-business-part-2/, http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/05/31/on-helping-that-is-anything-but/, http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/06/05/odds-and-ends-about-burzynski-clinic/, http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/06/07/i-want-my-anp/, http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/druginfo/fda-bevacizumab, http://www.drugs.com/newdrugs/fda-grants-accelerated-approval-avastin-brain-cancer-glioblastoma-has-progressed-following-prior-1342.html, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10561351/, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/11475493/, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/19114704/, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/20108991/, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2645088/, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10561351/, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11475493/, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19114704/, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20108991/, http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/burzynski-cancer-is-a-serious-business-part-2-like-the-first-burzynski-movie-only-more-so/, http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/editorial-staff/, http://www.wsusurgery.com/facultyc3/david-gorski/, http://www.wsusurgery.com/research-team-dr-gorski/, https://mobile.twitter.com/gorskon, https://mobile.twitter.com/oracknows, https://mobile.twitter.com/ScienceBasedMed, lie, Merola, Orac, Part 2: Like the first Burzynski movie only more so?", phase III clinical trials, quickly realized that David H. Gorski MD PhD FACS is NOT doing something wrong when he LIES about Burzynski", Temodar, Temozolomide, The Skeptics | Leave a reply

Search

Recent posts

  • Pete Cohen films Pat and Steve Clarkson January 15, 2014
  • Pete Cohen talks to Steve and Mary Jo Siegel January 14, 2014
  • Pete Cohen talks with Doug Olson January 10, 2014
  • Pete Cohen talks with Burzynski Patient January 8, 2014
  • Dr. Li-Chuan Chin, PhD, National Cancer Institute Scientist (1991-1997) talks about Dr. Burzynski and Antineoplastons January 6, 2014

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com
Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar