Pete Cohen films Pat and Steve Clarkson

Posted on January 15, 2014 by didymusjudasthomas

——————————————————————
Pat Clarkson, and I come from Danville, California, which is near San Francisco, and I have multiple myeloma; which is not a common cancer
About 20,000 people in the United States have the disease, and about 10,000 die every year, and 10,000 get the disease
So it’s a relatively small number of folks,that have it
So it’s not well
It’s not as well researched as some of the other cancers, um, but we’re hoping that the, um, Burzynski Clinic can help me

There’s not much hope for me
I, I have probably, a, uh, prognosis of a couple, couple years
Maybe a year or two to live, um, without, um, without I, I, an alternative method of treatment, and that’s why
——————————————————————
If I could say this a little differently
The conventional medicine, or what we would call conventional medicine, which is, you know, chemotherapy, radiation, uh, surgery; which is not possible with, uh, multiple myeloma because there is no, no large tumor that can be surgically removed, uh, the doctors have told us basically there is no cure, and that, and I, I say doctors; this is our local oncologist, um, and the head of oncology at, um, University of California, San Francisco; which is a very well respected school, uh, hospital, that there is no, uh, no reasonable possibility of a cure
Um, by contrast, uh, Dr. Burzynski, we have found out, has, uh, cured several people with myeloma, and he’s cured many other people with different kinds of cancer
The problem is, uh, that the FDA in its wisdom, will not allow us to, uh, be treated with the, uh, antineoplastons that are the backbone of the Burzynski therapy
——————————————————————
Well they’ve told us that they don’t have evidence that it’s, um, that it’s an effective treatment
Uh, that, they don’t have evidence that it’s not, non-toxic; which in fact, uh, is incorrect because the FDA does have evidence that it’s non-toxic
——————————————————————
Through the Senator’s office at the, the FDA is saying that they, they don’t know for sure that it’s not toxic; that’s not true, uh, and they don’t know that it will cure the disease, and therefor they can’t approve it
We’re willing
Pat’s willing to take the odds of a treatment, that is not 100% guaranteed, and let’s face it, most of the treatments that are approved by the FDA, are toxic, and are not guaranteed
So we don’t really understand, uh, why they have an issue with it, except that, uh, there’s an awful lot of money involved
Um, one of the peculiarities of the FDA, we understand they’re, by law, required to get much of their funding from the very companies that they’re supposed to be supervising

As, as I understand, uh, the Constitution, there is no basis in the Constitution for the Federal Government to be telling, an American, who they can use for a doctor or what drugs that they can use for, uh, their, their illness
Yet, over the years this, uh, this power has grown and been accepted at the FDA, and now it’s a, uh, uh, it’s, it’s out of control
——————————————————————
We have asked the FDA what is different about my case
Why I don’t get an exemption
We don’t have a response yet to that, to that question
——————————————————————
While doctors are generally very bright; they have to be to get through medical school, but they don’t have any training in critical, critical thinking, and most of them that I run into are not particularly good critical thinkers
The world they live in is to memorize a set of symptoms, then to look up or remember what those symptoms suggest in terms of a disease, and then remember or look up what the treatment is

So, here we have, um, uh, Dr. Burzynski, who is also a Ph.D biochemist, which is a, a interesting and, and very useful, uh, combination, who discovered that, um, in people who have cancer, they generally don’t have, or they have very reduced levels of what he now calls, uh, antineoplastons, and neoplaston is simply the medical jargon for cancer; so it’s anti-cancer, in effect, um, he discover the people who, uh, don’t have cancer, do have, high levels of this, and determined from research that these are controlled by, um, by the genes, and it’s part of the body’s immune system, in effect
We all produce cancer cells everyday of our lives
Like we produce bac, or have bacteria in our gi, digestive tract, that is controlled, by certain genes
In this case, um, he discovered that by, uh, by injecting, uh, or infusing, uh, these, they’re called peptides, peptide, that the patient could be helped
How, how innocuous, or how anti-toxic, can you have
It’s a, it’s a substance th, the body itself produces, unless the genes have shut down
Which is the case in, uh, some, in most, or at least half I guess, of multiple myeloma cases
——————————————————————
My, my message would be that they don’t have the right to tell me to hold a, a life or a death, um, decision
They, they don’t have the right to tell me that, um, I can’t have treatment that I seek, or I will die
I don’t think they have that right to do that
——————————————————————
Treatment is available
Uh, it is our choice
We are free Americans
We’re well informed
Uh, well educated
It should be our choice, and the Federal government in any, in any form should not have the authority to interfere with that
——————————————————————
Uh, nothing’s guaranteed in this world, um, but we’ve got, um, we’ve got some confidence in this clinic and in this treatment
======================================
Pat & Steve Clarkson
January 27, 2012
Houston, Texas
6:25
2/3/2012
——————————————————————

======================================

Pete Cohen talks to Steve and Mary Jo Siegel

Posted on January 14, 2014 by didymusjudasthomas

This is our the best and the dearest, uh, patient who came to our clinic 20
——————————————————————
2
——————————————————————
2 years ago
——————————————————————
22 years ago
——————————————————————
and she was in the, she came with Hodgkin lymphoma, and a stage 4, and she didn’t have good, uh, prognosis
How long, did they tell you
——————————————————————
They told me that I was gonna die, of non-Hodgkins lymphoma
That I had a fatal disease
They would treat me for awhile with, uh, chemotherapy and radiation, um, a bone marrow transplant, and, um, we, they, we would see what would happen, but no cure
Not a cure at all
——————————————————————
So
——————————————————————
That was 22 years ago
Um, I thank God everyday that I found Dr. Burzynski’s clinic, and Dr. Burzynski and his staff
Um, I was on his treatment for, um, 3 months when this huge tumor on the side of my neck started to reduce and finally disappeared
——————————————————————
So we adopted her as our, uh, family
——————————————————————
(laughs)
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
and now, she is our family member, and many others
——————————————————————
So tell me, uh, how did you find out about Dr. Burzynski?
——————————————————————
I was in a cancer support group, and, uh, one of the ladies in there said, you know, you have non-Hodgkins lymphoma
There’s a doctor in Houston whose been treating it with very good results
You should go and check it out
Which I went back home to my husband and said: “There’s Dr. Burzynski in Houston, Texas, and he’s having good results,” and, ah, Steve said: “You know, I’ve heard of this doctor
You know, I wrote his name down”
He’d heard about him
Wrote his name down for future use, and I think about, uh, the next couple of days we were in Houston, and we got to the clinic and I just felt I was in the right place
Everybody there
It was
The feeling was so different than being at a UCLA or a USC or Dana Farber
It was just
I knew immediately I was in the right place, and I met Dr. Burzynski
Well first of all Dr. Barbara came out and hugged me, and, uh, it was, it was so wonderful and I’ll never forget the feeling of, of, uh, my first walk into the Burzynski Clinic
——————————————————————
So tell me, what did, uh, any, did, did you have an oncologist at home and tell them that you were coming here ?
——————————————————————
Yeah, we did
Um, uh, I had an oncologist at UCLA who was a lymphoma specialist, and he was the one that told me I would die of the disease
Um, when we told him that we were going to see Dr. Burzynski, he wasn’t, uh, overjoyed, to say the least, and he told us very negative things and, uh, but I thought, he wasn’t offering me anything, and, uh, when I did get to the Burzynski Clinic, Dr. Burzynski said to me: “I think I can help you,” he said
He didn’t
He didn’t tell me, he was going to cure me
He didn’t
He just said: “I think I can help you,” and, it was non-toxic, and the, um, conventional medicine was offering me high-dose chemotherapy, radiation, and in fact, in mu, as much radiation as people who were, uh, within one mile of ground zero at Hiroshima, and, and they were going to bring me as close to death as possible, and then, rescue me
Uh, and then Dr. Burzynski was going to do this and actually have, where actually I would have hope of a cure, non-toxically
My hair never fell out
I felt well
Um, I lead my normal life
I drove my kids to school
I cleaned the house
Whatever
You know
It was
It’s a wonderful treatment
——————————————————————
So, at what point did you realize, I’m free of cancer ?
Do you remember that point of ?
——————————————————————
Uh, well I remember the point
I remember it very well
Um, the, it
It’s so big
Um, I had, uh, several CAT scans
I had 2 CAT scans in a row
The first one that showed no cancer at all, and, um, I had them done at UCLA, and, um, and then I had a second one, 3 months later, and that one was, was absolutely clear
So, um, it was, it was an amazing feeling, and actually 48 hours was following me, because it was, it was a really a big story, um, you know
Cancer throughout my body
No, no cancer at all and, and my medical records show, um, you look at my X-rays, my CAT scans, from starting Dr. Burzynski’s treatment, um, to approximately 9 months later
Reduction, reduction, reduction, until there was no cancer
——————————————————————
So what did, what did your oncologist say ?
Did you, did you go back to your oncologist and say: “You said I was gonna die”
——————————————————————
Uh, yes, we did that
——————————————————————
And what did he say ?
——————————————————————
And, and actually people would call him and a, people who were interested in Dr. Burzynski, and he would say: “Oh, she’s a spontaneous remission”
He would never accept the fact that I was treated, and cured by Dr. Burzynski, but my medical records prove it, and of, you know I, There are so many patients like me
I’m not the only one
So
——————————————————————
So ok, tell me
Let me ask you a couple more questions
——————————————————————
Mhmm
——————————————————————
What sort of a person do you think Dr. Burzynski is?
——————————————————————
Well aside from being the most wonderful, gentle, sensitive, caring doctor, and you don’t find many of those
I went to many doctors, while, while we were trying to find the answer
Many, and Dr. Burzynski is so above them
He, because he really makes you feel like a person, and that he cares, and, he’s also a genius
He, I know that he speaks about 8 languages
He’s an expert on the Bible
He, he just knows so much about everything
Um, I love to be in the room with him
He’s a very special man
——————————————————————
So, you recovered, and then, ’cause you, when did you set up the patient support group, and why did you do that ?
——————————————————————
Uh, actually my husband and I did that together, and it was during, um, the trials, uh, the Texas State Board started, in fact, I became a patient, and 2 months later, ah, he was brought to a hearing in front of the Texas State Medical Board, and so Steve and I, um, organized the patients to, um, be at that hearing to support Dr. B, ’cause he’d been going through this long before I became a patient, but, um, we wanted to show support, because I was already starting to fe, I was feeling better already
I was already seeing some reduction, and now my, the medicine was in jeopardy
I, It could be taken away from me at any time
So we decided to organize the patients and to show support, and all the patients wanted to help, a, uh, obviously
So, um, we’d go to every hearing, every, uh, the trial, we were there every day, um, and we would, patients would march in front of the court building, um,
It was, it was really a sight
An unbelievable sight
——————————————————————
And why do you think that he was treated the way that he was treated ?
Why do you think they wanted to take him down ?
——————————————————————
I think it’s because
There’s many reasons
I think the main reason is because what Dr. Burzynski does is making what all other conventional doctors are doing wrong, because chemotherapy is not the answer
Chemotherapy makes people sick, and, uh, most of the time it does not cure people
Um, all that poison and radiation
There’s gotta be a better way, and there is a better way
Dr. Burzynski has found it
I was sick
I had cancer 22 years ago
Um, my hair never fell out, and, uh, it was a treatment that I was grateful to be on every day
——————————————————————
So how many patients have you come in contact with that Dr. Burzynski
——————————————————————
Hundreds
Hundreds, and as you say by my patient group web-site
Um, I think I have about 90 stories on there now, and there are many more, because, um, I haven’t been able to get in touch with everybody, but over the years, uh, people give me their stories
Sometimes people will call me, um, but we, we are a patient group because we, we’ve all been helped or cured by Dr. Burzynski, and we, we want everybody to have access to this treatment

Steve actually had the chance to ask one of, uh, one of the prosecutors, um, at the trial, that exact question: “What would you do,” and he was prosecuting Dr. Burzynski, and he actually said: “I’d be first in line”
So, once you know the whole story, and you know the science, and you, especially if you do the research, um, you, you can come to the truth, and the truth is, Dr. Burzynski, has cured cancer
He cured me
I’ve been in remission for, in remission, for, uh, 22 years, and that’s a cure, and, uh, he could help so many, many, many more people
The, he has breast cancer patients now that are, that are doing so well
He has many
I just talked to an ovarian cancer patient
He has, um, all, all different types of cancers
What he needs is funding from our government
Um, all other doctors and, and, um, institutions, they get ah, mu, get so much money from the government
Dr. Burzynski doesn’t get one penny
If we could just think
If, d, if the government would just fund Dr. Burzynski, he could have a cure for all cancers
I believe that with all my heart, and somehow, some day this has to happen
——————————————————————
The Sceptics (10:37)
——————————————————————
Yeah, just tell me what this whole kind of skeptic movement
You do any research on Dr. Burzynski there’s a few things
——————————————————————
Yes
——————————————————————
that always come up
This guy Saul
——————————————————————
Saul Green
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
Mmm
——————————————————————
and some other stuff
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
So just tell me
What’s that all about and where did that all come from ?
——————————————————————
It stems from, uh, a lawsuit that was filed against, uh, Dr. Burzynski
Actually it was, uh, an insurance company, that didn’t wanna pay for, uh, for the treatment
A particular patient had been treated here in Texas, uh, was put into remission
Was successfully treated and then it turns out the insurance company did not wanna pay for it, so they brought in these people
These quote unquote experts
Cancer experts of, you know, rather dubious backgrounds
This is all that they do, is they look for ways to demean people
They look for ways to blacken their reputation
They ultimately became a group known as Quack watch, and these were brought in as the expert witnesses to say that this is not an approved treatment, albeit, was not true
They said the treatment didn’t work and clearly it did, and, uh, they have since gotten funding from insurance companies, from the government, private funding, and they go around to debunk things that are against mainstream, um, medicine, and, uh, their, their support comes from the insurance company and from the pharmaceutical companies who benefit from, from their work, and, uh, it expanded
Expanded all over the world to, uh, they’re in the United States, they’re in the U.K., they’re in Australia, and, uh, they have a very big presence
When the internet came into being they, you know, they went viral with this kind of stuff
So when you type in Burzynski, uh, a lot of the negative comes up first
So that’s the first thing you see is all this negative stuff, and it’s all hearsay
None of it has any basis in fact
It’s all lies
Um, you know, he, Dr. Burzynski never did anything illegal ever, and it was all based on, on very questionable legal grounds that he was ever sued, that he was, that any case was ever brought against him by the FDA or the Texas Medical Board, and all of those cases failed
They never held up to scrutiny
They all failed, and here Dr. Burzynski is today, and he’s thriving, and people come here from all over the world to be treated
Many are cured of their cancers, and, uh, all of these people in the Quack watch are gone
Uh, Saul Green has passed away
Uh, I don’t wish him ill, but I’m glad he’s not here, thank you, and all of these other people are gone and they’re not thriving, and they’re just like, you know, they’re like bacteria or like fungus under rocks, and when you shine a light on them, they can’t hold up to the scrutiny
The real light is here
The real truth is here in Houston at the Burzynski Clinic
——————————————————————
Thoughts on Dr. Burzynski (13:46)
——————————————————————
What do you think of Dr. Burzynski, yourself ?
——————————————————————
I, I, I think Mary Jo’s pretty much summed it up
Uh, I, am of course
It, it, it’s not an unbiased opinion
It can’t be
He’s the man that saved my wife
Uh, she was cast off, um, as, as, as an incurable
She was told time and time again, not just by her on, oncologist at UCLA, Dr. Peter Rosen, but we went all over the country
We went to USC in, University of Southern California, UCLA, Stanford Medical, Dana-Farber; which is associated with Harvard, uh, in, uh, Boston, and everywhere we went, she was told: “There’s no hope”
“You’re gonna die”
“It’s just a matter of time”
“We have to see how long, how long it’s gonna take”
Um, against my better wishes, we came to the Burzynski Clinic, and she said: “I’m starting today,” and I said: “Don’t you think we should go back and discuss with Dr. Rosen at UCLA ?
She said: “No, they have nothing to offer me”
She was that brave, and we started that day, and we’ve never looked, we’ve never looked back
So to ask me about what I think about Dr. Burzynski, when my wife was told she was gonna die, and I was already making plans for how am I going to take care of my children without Mary Jo; my life partner, and he saved her life, I’m not gonna give you unbiased
——————————————————————
Mhmm
——————————————————————
an unbiased opinion of how I feel about the man
There’s probably nobody, that I have greater love and greater respect for, uh, in, in the whole world, and, uh, to add about how, how smart, how intelligent this man is, ah, expert on, on history as Barbara was saying
Expert on religion
He’s an expert on mushrooms
He knows more about mushrooms than any 10 mushroom experts in the world
Bees
He knows about bees
Who cares about bees, but he knows everything, because bees happen to be a rich production source of antineoplastons
Who knew ?
Dr. Burzynski knew, and that’s why we need to listen to him
We as a society
The world needs to listen to this man
——————————————————————
Conventional Cancer Treatment and The FDA (16:05)
——————————————————————
When you put some critical thought, critical analysis, you find that chemotherapy initially works
What it is, it’s a good, the first time around it’s a good tumor shrinking, they’re good tumor shrinking agents, but over the long run they create so many problems that eventually, the tumor becomes, the cells become resistant and the tumor takes over, or, if it is successful in shrinking the tumor to, to a, a size where the patient can survive, what happens after that is there’s a secondary cancer that’s created by the chemotherapy, with very few exceptions
Testicular cancer is one exception where it works
Some childhood leukemia’s they’ve had some great success with chemotherapy, but by in large it’s a failed modality, and the side effects are so bad as, as to be called horrific, uh, is how I would describe them from what I’ve seen in, in my family and in my friends, and my associates that’ve had to undergo it
So why do we allow that, when something like antineoplastons and Burzynski’s treatment, totally non-toxic, working with the body, allowing you to lead a normal life, and on it statistically for the number of people that have been treated, uh, compared to the number of people that have walked out of here in remission, or cured after 5 years; whatever definition you wanna use, we don’t allow that
We look at that as, uh, conventional medicine looks at like that as, looks at that as some sort of quackery
This is, this is, uh, critical thinking and science turned on its head, and it doesn’t make sense, and it goes back to what I was saying before
Why it doesn’t make sense, because there’s entrenched financial interests, and there’s a paradigm that says we do for cancer, we do chemotherapy, we do radiation, we do surgery, and that’s it
Anything else is not acceptable, because it goes against the paradigm

In the bureaucracy we know as the FDA
We’ve been fighting them for so long and they’ve been described as “The B Team”
“The B Team” is,that they be here when you come in and you start complaining, your problem starts, they be here, and when you decide to quit complaining because you’ve beat your head against the wall for so many years, they still be here (laugh)
So it’s “The B Team”
They’re bureaucrats
This is what they do
There, they have a certain set of tasks
Certain things that they’re tasked with
Protection of the food and drug supply of the United States, whatever that means
Whatever they deem it to mean
Whatever they decide it means
That’s what they’re gonna do, and it’s pretty hard to fight that
It’s pretty hard, unless you have a political, unless you have a, a, a, a political, ah, constituency, and you can put a lot of pressure on them
——————————————————————
So
——————————————————————
and that’s the only way
——————————————————————
So what’s the answer ?
What will, uh
How will Dr. Burzynski prevail ?
——————————————————————
Ultimately, in, in my, in my, in my view, the real tragedy is, is that he’s not going to prevail here in the United States
It’s going to be extremely difficult
It’s an uphill battle that, knowing Dr. Burzynski, he’s gonna keep fighting it, uh, and, and he’ll keep fighting that battle, but the real opportunity for him is to, uh, move this product and license it overseas, and, uh, other countries are interested
Other countries are more open, uh, to new modalities
They’re not entrenched, uh, and don’t have the financial, uh, interests, the, that are, the entrenched financial interests like we do here, like chemotherapy and, and, uh, radiation therapy, and I think that’s where ultimately we as Americans, as sad as it is, are going to have to go overseas to be treated and to get this medication

The FDA is so capricious in their decision-making, and in their exception granting, uh, that if Pat had AIDS, and this was anti-AIDS medication; proven or not or only with limited, uh, proven efficaciousness, uh, and proven limited proof that it was somewhat non-toxic, she would be able to get approval like that
The FDA has taken a drug approval process that generally takes anywhere from 10 to 15 years, and where there is political, successful political pressure applied, they have reduced that down to some cases 4 to 8 months as in the case of the anti-HIV drugs, and that’s because there is a very strong, very powerful political lobby in Washington, and throughout the country, and they have been able to apply pressure at key points in, uh, Congress
Congress puts that pressure on the FDA, says: “C’mon let’s get the ball forward
These are voting people
We have millions of people in this country with HIV who are compacted together and make a viable political force
Let’s move forward”
In the case of multiple-myeloma
In the case of these cancers or these people that wanna be treated, who have failed all conventional therapy, and wanna be treated by Dr. Burzynski with something that we know works
Something that is, is non-toxic, they, they don’t have
We’re not a viable political force
We’re not important to the Washington bureaucrats, to the Washington lawmakers
So nothing gets done, and these exceptions for the use of antineoplastons are not granted, and that’s, that’s the sad truth
======================================
Steve and Mary Jo Siegel
January 2012
22:01
11/9/2012
——————————————————————

======================================

Posted in Cohen, Pete, Stanislaw Rajmund Burzynski | Tagged "48 Hours", "8 languages", "anti-AIDS", "anti-HIV drugs", "big story", "bone marrow transplant", "breast cancer", "Burzynski’s treatment", "Cancer experts", "cast off", "CAT scans", "childhood leukemia’s", "conventional therapy", "conventional” medicine", "critical analysis", "critical thought", "Dana-Farber", "decision-making", "Dr. B", "Dr. Barbara", "Dr. Burzynski", "Dr. Burzynski’s clinic", "Dr. Burzynski’s treatment", "Dr. Peter Rosen", "Dr. Rosen", "entrenched financial interests", "expert witnesses", "failed modality", "fell out", "felt well", "FINALLY, "financial interests", "good, "ground zero", "high-dose chemotherapy", "Hodgkin lymphoma", "https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/pete-cohen-talks-to-steve-and-mary-jo-siegel/", "http://youtu.be/DoeWuDRTFjg", "huge, "insurance companies", "insurance company", "legal grounds", "life partner", "mainstream medicine", "Mary Jo Siegel", "medical record", "medical records", "Multiple myeloma", "non-Hodgkins lymphoma", "non-toxically", "normal life", "ovarian cancer", "patient group web-site", "Pete Cohen talks to Steve and Mary Jo Siegel https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/pete-cohen-talks-to-steve-and-mary-jo-siegel/", "Pete Cohen talks to Steve and Mary Jo Siegel", "Pete Cohen", "pharmaceutical companies", "political constituency", "political force", "political lobby", "political pressure", "private funding", "Quack watch", "radiation therapy", "Saul Green", "secondary cancer", "she’s", "side effects", "spontaneous remission", "stage 4", "Stanford Medical", "Steve and Mary Jo Siegel", "Steve Siegel", "Testicular cancer", "Texas State Board", "Texas State Medical Board", "University of Southern California", "Washington bureaucrats", "Washington lawmakers", "X-rays", #FAILED, above, absolutely, accept, acceptable, access, adopted, against, agents, AIDS, albeit, allow, Allowing, already, amazing feeling, Americans, answer, antineoplaston, antineoplastons, applied, apply, approved, Approximately, aside, ask, associated, associates, Australia, away, awhile, “bureaucrats”, “Conventional cancer treatment", “Look, “non-toxic”, “Thank you!”, “The B Team”, backgrounds, bacteria, bad, based, basis, beat, bee, Bees, being, believe, benefit, best, better, Bible, blacken, body, Boston, brave, bring, brought, building, bureaucracy, Burzynski Clinic, CALL, came, Cancer, cancerous, cancers, capricious, care, cares, caring, case, cases, cells, certain, chance, Chemo, CHEMOTHERAPY, CHILDREN, cleaned, clear, clearly, clinic, close, come, comes, coming, compacted, compared, complain, complaining, Congress, contact, conventional, countries, country, couple, court, created, CURE, cured, cures, dearest, death, debunk, decide, decided, deem, demean, describe, die, died, different, disappeared, discuss, disease, Doctor, doctors, doing, drove, drug, dubious, during, efficaciousness, entrenched, especially, eventually, ever, everybody, everyday, everything, everywhere, exact, exception, exceptions, expanded, expert, experts, F.D.A., fact, family, fatal, feel, feeling, fight, fighting, filed, find, first, following, food, force, forget, forward, found, free, friends, front, fund, funding, funds, fungus, Future, genius, gentle, glad, going, gone, gotten, government, granted, granting, grateful, greater, group, hair, happen, happens, hard, Harvard, head, heard, Hearing, hearsay, heart, held, help, helped, her, him, Hiroshima, history, HIV, hold, home, hope, horrific, house, Houston, hugged, hundreds, husband, ill, illegal, immediately, IMPORTANT, incurable, initially, institutions, intelligent, interested, Internet, jeopardy, key, kids, kind, knew, know, ladies, later, lawsuit, lead, least, license, Lies, life, light, like, limited, listen, long, looked, looks, love great, lymphoma, making, Many, march, mean, means, medicine, member, mile, millions, modalities, money, most, move, movement, mushroom, mushrooms, neck, needs, negative, never, Nobody, none, nothing, obviously, offer, offering, oncologist, oncologists, oncology, opinion, opportunity, organize, organized, others, over, overjoyed, overseas, paradigm, particular, passed, patient, patients, pay, penny, people, person, place, plans, poison, political, possible", powerful, presence, pressure, prevail, probably, problem, problems, product, production, prognosis, prosecuting, prosecutors, protection, prove, proven, quackery, Quackwatch, question, questionable, Questions, quit, quote, RADIATION, rather, realize, Reason, reasons, recovered, reduce, reduced, reduction, reductions, religion, remember, remission, reputation, rescue, research, resistant, respect, results", rich, rocks, Sad, said, saved, SAY, says, sceptics, school, science, scrutiny, second, sense, sensitive, several, she, shine, show, showed, shrink, shrinking, sick, side, sight, since, Skeptic, smart, society, someday, somehow, something, sometimes, sort, source, speaks, special, specialist, staff, start, started, starting, starts, statistically, stems, stories", story, strong, stuff, successful, successfully, sued, summed, supply, support, surgery, survive, taken, takes, talks, tasked, tasks, tell, Texas, thank, they, think, Thoughts, thriving, through, throughout, time, together, told, totally, touch, tragedy extremely, treat, treated, Treating, treatment, trials, true, TRUTH, trying, tumor, tumors, turned, type, types, U.K., UCLA, ultimately, unbelievable, unbiased, undergo, United States, unless, unquote, uphill, USC, viable, view, viral, voting, walk, walked, wall, wanted, whatever, while, whole, wife, wish, wishes, without, wonderful, work, working, works, world, wrong, wrote, yourself | Leave a reply

Pete Cohen talks with Doug Olson

Posted on January 10, 2014 by didymusjudasthomas

Reply

——————————————————————
My name is Doug Olson
I’m from Nebraska
Western Nebraska
And, uh, my mother has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer
So, we, uh, middle of November, now this is first of, first of the year, eh, but in the middle of November her weight, she was losing weight, you know
She was suffering from indigestion and, and stomach pain, and so we started to have her checked, uh, for problems with her stomach for ulcers and that kind of thing, and all that proved negative, and they put her on an ulcer medicine anyway, thinking that maybe that would solve the inflammation in her stomach, and, uh, then we decided that we (?) better see another physician, and so we did that, and they then ultra sounded and then CAT scanned and found that she had tumors in her pancreas and in her liver
Uh, many years ago, back in, in the late 70’s, my parents had been involved with, with the cancer, uh, subject in regards to my father’s sister, and then his cousin
He started researching cancer and cancer treatments when his sister passed away, and then, uh, they got in contact with a doctor in Orden, Nebraska, that treated cancer patients with Laetrile, and he also did other, not so ordinary things
He did duculation therapy
Uh, a number of things that were really treatments for the disease rather than just treatments for the symptoms, and, uh, during that time, dad testified at the state legislature; they were trying to work against Dr. Miller’s license
This was the Dr. Miller in Orden, and, uh, so dad testified on, on his behalf
Uh, dad’s cousin was, uh, a patient of his, and she had a brain tumor the size of a lemon, and Dr. Miller put her on, uh, Laetrile treatments on a, on a special diet and some things, uh
——————————————————————
And this was what, in the 70’s ?
——————————————————————
This was back in the, probably the late 70’s, and, so, when they
Well they cured her
She had been sent home from the Mayo Clinic
Given 3 to 6 months to live, and, uh, they had, uh, burned with radiation and cobalt I believe is what they were treating her with at that time
Uh, they burned the, uh, nerves in her eyes so that her eyes crossed
Uh, they sent her home to die
They, uh
She was in a wheelchair
She was a young woman and she had a young child
Wasn’t able to hold that child, and so when my dad saw her, met her, she was in that condition
She was it, in the last 6 months of her life
Gave her a book about, uh, the subject, and told her about Dr. Miller, and her family
She then went to Dr. Miller to see if there was any help for her, and he, and he immediately put her on Laetrile treatment then and, and, uh, the interesting thing about it, looking at his doctor’s protocol; because I’ve come across his protocol, uh, Dr. Miller was also giving his patients antineoplastons, and
——————————————————————
Yeah, because we’ve got this thing here that you gave me
——————————————————————
Mhmm
——————————————————————
Just explain to me what this is
——————————————————————
This was his physician’s protocol, to list, uh, the different medicines a person should, should be on
——————————————————————
If they had cancer
——————————————————————
Uh, if they had cancer, and so, uh, this was given to another friend of ours, a friend of the family, uh, the folks that rented one of our properties, uh, the woman got a, a tumor as well, and this was given to her as part of the regimen she should follow, and she was given Laetrile injections, and then as soon as the injections, uh, were over they went then to pills as the size of the dosage went down, and when you got to pills you got to go home
So, uh, I remember speaking to her at the time
I had a
I was in high school, and I had a summer job with her husband, who was the county engineer
So, uh, we saw them all the time, and she told us, uh, the circumstances when, when she was allowed to come home
She was feeling strong
She said: “I haven’t felt better”
As a part of the diet and the things that, that they had her doing
She said she felt better than she had in many years
So she and her daughter, started a business in town in order to pay for the treatments, and, uh, she recovered
The tumor continued to shrink and shrink until it was nothing
Uh, what had been listed as inoperable, uh, after it shrunk halfway they decided, well maybe we can operate on you
Uh, we think it’s operable now
She said: “Why would I let you operate when what I’m doing is working” ?
But, uh, she is alive yet today and in her mid-80’s and, uh, so, uh, when it came to my mother’s illness, we contacted her, and asked her how she’s doing, and she’s sent this protocol she’s been keeping all these years
Uh, as a result of my parents knowing Dr. Miller back when he was alive
He is, he has passed away, uh, 7 maybe years ago, and, uh, many years ago when they were taking chelation therapy from him, he had given my mother, uh, a flyer on Dr. Burzynski, and, uh, said if anything ever happens to you after I’m gone, this is the man to contact, and so we’ve had that flyer in a file for many years at my parents house, and so when mom got sick she immediately began digging that out and found
——————————————————————
So your mom immediately started thinking, well I need to find that leaflet
That’s what we were told to do
——————————————————————
Yes
——————————————————————
And did, and did she go and speak to an oncologist ?
Did she say that she wanted to come here, or ?
——————————————————————
We had a local physician, who was not an oncologist, that had, that was the 2nd physician we, we consulted, that did the ultrasound and the CAT scan for her and, and they knew that she had tumors, and no we did not go to an on, oncologist from there
——————————————————————
Why ?
——————————————————————
because we knew that we did not want to take their treatments, uh, so we immediately contacted the clinic here in, in Houston, Texas, and, uh, we had to wait on, uh, certain things to be completed
CAT scans
Different things had to be done, and, and information had to be sent down here and examined, and then, uh, after a period of maybe 2 weeks, hassling with information, we were told that, yes, uh, we, they would accept her as a patient, and we were getting in towards the holidays at that time
Would we like to wait until the holidays were over, because Christmas
You know, there would be 5 days off for Christmas, uh, over a weekend and 5 days off for New Years over a weekend, and we would be down here in Houston over those times, but we elected to come anyway because we could get the treatment started right away
——————————————————————
Mhmm
——————————————————————
rather than to wait another month before starting treatments, and, uh, so they, uh, immediately put, put her on antineoplastons and, uh, they sent away the tissue samples to Arizona to have a CARIS test done, and determine what medications would be
——————————————————————
So did you have those results come back ?
——————————————————————
Yes, those results came back quicker than what we expected
——————————————————————
And wh, what did they show ?
——————————————————————
Well they, they show a, a list of treatments that are effective, and against it, and then a list of treatments actually that encourage it’s growth
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
So you end up with a list of, uh, approximately 7 on each side
7 good
7 bad
——————————————————————
And these are all different cancer drugs
So what they’re looking at is all
——————————————————————
Yes
——————————————————————
is all the different cancer drugs, and which ones
——————————————————————
And whether we’ve got a, a thousand or 2 thousand different drugs that person might try, and, uh, so
——————————————————————
So the (?) for how to, to try a few of these chemotherapies, but in very small doses
Is that right ?
——————————————————————
There’s 2, 2 chemotherapies
One is an, is an oral chemotherapy that is, uh, quite mild in its side effects, and then, uh, there’s another much stronger one that was, uh, also one of th, the top 2, and, uh, the side effects for it are more varied and more violent, uh, if you will, and, uh, my mother’s had one treatment of that so far, and the treat, the side effects
She did, is suffering from side effects from that particular
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
It’s Oxaliplatin, and, uh, some people have very violent side effects but she’s thankfully not had any violent side effects
——————————————————————
So why didn’t you go down the conventional road of having high-dose chemotherapy ?
——————————————————————
Well, when you research the, uh, success rate, with pancreatic cancer, going the normal way, uh, or the normal, uh, road, the success rate is very, very small, and so you’re just guaranteeing, in my opinion, if, if the success rate is 5% or under, uh, you’re introducing yourself to a, a road to death, that’s very unpleasant
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
You know, you just want to go home and make yourself very comfortable on painkillers and, and enjoy the rest of your life, uh, if that’s the, if that’s the road you’re planning to take
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
Uh, that was our opinion, and so
——————————————————————
What do you think about all the resistance then of, of Dr. Burzynski and all of the kind of, uh, ?
——————————————————————
We have
——————————————————————
(?) people just calling him a
What’s the word ?
——————————————————————
Charlatan
——————————————————————
Charlatan
Yeah
Fraud
——————————————————————
Yes, we, uh, we have seen course, of course these things through our, our life
Dr. Miller
The whole Laetrile treatment thing was something that was, uh, thrown out
You know, it’s pretty well suppressed now
You can go to Mexico and get those treatments
——————————————————————
Why do you think they were, pushed aside ?
This Laetrile
——————————————————————
It’s
——————————————————————
What is Laetrile ?
——————————————————————
Well Laetrile is a naturally occurring, uh, substance that you find in some of our foods
It’s, they call it B17 although, vitamin B17, although there’s some discussion as to whether it’s really a vitamin
Another name for it is Amygdalin
——————————————————————
Amygdalin
Yeah
——————————————————————
Uh, it’s found in peach pits and apricot pits in high levels but there’s a number of other foods that you find it in
Uh, it, it,
I’m not sure, whether this is 100% accurate, but my understanding of it is it’s associated with, with cyanide, and it would be, uh, like an encapsulated cyanide, that as it travels through your body, the cyanide portion, um, does not become available to your body until it becomes in, uh, associated with a cancer cell
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
and the cancer cells attack the outer shell of that molecule, and the cyanide becomes, uh, uh, available then, and it kills the cancer cell that’s right there
So it was apparently a very nontoxic substance
Uh, you have regulated dosages
I mean, it seems to me interesting, uh, when a doctor prescribes a dose of chemotherapy, uh, there’s nothing that I can think of much more toxic than a, than a chemotherapy drug, and certainly they’ll kill you if they don’t, uh, give you the right dosage, but it was not seemed, deemed accessible that a byproduct of food; which a doctor could regulate the dosage of as well, could be used as a transfer, cancer treatment
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
Uh, and we’ve seen things in the past, as well
When I was a, a very young child, I had a great aunt, that, uh, I was not even aware; at the time I was very young, she was traveling to Texas and getting treatments
Uh, one of them was called the Hoxsey treatment and, uh, she was living a very comfortable life on treatments that she got there
There were 2 treatments in Texas at that time, that, uh, were available
The FDA would come in and raid the clinics, and make just life miserable for them
They got one of them closed down, and that was the one that my great aunt was on, and that treatment was, was pills that she could take, uh, and live quite comfortably, in Nebraska
Once they closed that clinic down, then she had to go down, uh, to the other clinic in Texas, which was a supplement that was a liquid that tasted bad, and she had to make frequent trips, at that point, but still, as long as she could get that treatment she was comfortable and, and lived a normal life
A productive life
Uh, we knew her as our great aunt and, and didn’t even know her, uh, uh, that there was a health problem and, uh, but then the FDA got that clinic closed down
So, as soon as she lost access to those, her treatments, then her cancer which, uh, was no longer able to be controlled, came back strong and, and she died
So, uh, the family had been, had access to this knowledge and this, the FDA’s games with cancer treatments for many years
Um, I’m also married to, a, a gal whose father did blood research as a, he was a Ph.D and worked in university hospitals, in blood research all of his life
He, he discovered a blood protein that was associated with cancer
Uh, it was actually associated more with good health, maybe than you could say with cancer, but he discovered a, a blood coagulation protein, uh, or associated with blood coagulation that would, that could be used as a flag or a test, to see whether a person was healthy or not
Uh, as they applied it to patients in these hospitals, during their research trials, they found that this protein was an indicator whether a person had cancer or thrombosis
Uh, 2 of the very largest killers, and this protein, if present in high enough amounts in our blood, uh, was an indicator that you were healthy, and as the protein’s amount, uh, declined, then it was an indicator that something was wrong, and below a certain amount you knew something was wrong
You better be taking further testing
——————————————————————
Mhmm
——————————————————————
to find out what your problem was
Uh, that has run into resistance
Uh, that (?) has not been approved by the FDA, and, uh, th, our family’s experiences with cancer treatments, cancer drugs, as they’re affected by the FDA, we have determined by our opinion that, uh, it’s, un, unless there’s something that’s going to generate a, a lot of capital, and then a lot of tax money for the Federal Government, the FDA’s not very interested in it
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
Uh, so, cynical attitude, but evidence bears it out
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
and so we remain cynical until so, until something proves
——————————————————————
Yeah, absolutely
So this is this doctor in, uh, in the 70’s
This is information that he provided
——————————————————————
Yes
——————————————————————
and you can see here that he is obviously, antineoplastic enzymes
See, here obviously
Do you think he meant Dr. Burzynski ?
He just knew of him ?
You have no idea ?
——————————————————————
I have no idea
——————————————————————
He was obviously a fan, if he was someone that eventually said
He said it to you
Did you say he said it to your mum or to your dad?
——————————————————————
To my mom
Probably to mom and dad
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
Uh, my mom was the record keeper, and so, she kept the flyer
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
but they both took, uh, the, uh, the therapy from, uh, well, the blood therapy
I mentioned it earlier
Suddenly the name’s gone away
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
but, uh
——————————————————————
That’s ok
——————————————————————
So
——————————————————————
So what about, um
You know, one of the barriers that we had is, when we spoke to oncologists, they just said, no, you mustn’t come to see this guy
His work isn’t peer-reviewed
He’s a charlatan
Why, why do you think they would say that ?
What
I mean I’m surprised, that these oncologists don’t actually come here, to actually see what, what’s going on
So your opinion about that ?
——————————————————————
My opinion is, that physicians are, very much, tied up, with large pharmaceutical corporations
Uh, I spoke with my father-in-law
My father-in-law had to have research done in, in his Ph.D work, and he had to get cooperation from hospitals, from doctors, and, uh, all of these organizations in order to have the research done that he needed done, ’cause past his lab, when he wants to introduce research, onto a patients, uh, live blood, and he needs to collect specimens from patients, then a whole ‘nother group of, uh, set of authorizations have to be signed and, and he being a Ph.D working with the medical profession all his life, he knew how tied up the medical profession is, by, generally by M.D.’s, that control the money flow, uh, in the medical profession
Ph.D’s do the research, but they have to apply for grants, and typically the grants are controlled by M.D.’s, and so if an M.D. Decides that your, your particular research is either applicable to, uh, something they think will make a lot of money, or it’s the, the quote, uh, popular, popular item of the day
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
Politically correct, you name it, then you’re going to get funded
Otherwise, uh, my father-in-law noticed at different times, his research had to be funded out of his own pocket, and at other times, it looked like, it was something that doctors would like, and so they would, he would get funding, but I think that, ah, as he commented, any doctor, coming out of med school, has been contacted by a pharmaceutical company, and has probably signed a contract, that when that pharmaceutical company wants to test a drug, or test an item, that that medical, uh, doctor, will be accessible to them, to test their products
So, with the number of pharmaceutical companies that you have, and all of them recruiting M.D.’s as they come out of med school, and saying, you know, would you be part of our group, you end up under contract with the large pharmaceutical companies
——————————————————————
Mhmm
——————————————————————
and if, if 90% of the doctors are under contract with pharmaceutical companies, to, uh, to cooperate with their drug testing, then large Pharma, has control of virtually all doctors, and so, uh, uh, if you have large Pharma saying, we don’t want to see a cancer cure, that we’re not in control of, we don’t want to see something that makes curing disease cheap, and easy, and food related, then you’re not gonna
They’re going to put the word out to all their doctors: Don’t have any wo, don’t have anything to do with this
Uh, they can come up with, some written material for their, their doctors to read
They send them the evidence
——————————————————————
Mmm
——————————————————————
It may be accurate
It may not be very accurate, and, uh, but it’s just a smear campaign to destroy reputations so that they don’t get hurt financially
——————————————————————
Mhmm
——————————————————————
and, uh, so, uh, that’s the reason I believe
You know, most of these doctors, they don’t have the time, or the expertise to do the research themselves
They can’t read everything, and so when someone they trust, or someone that they’re financially, uh, obligated to, comes down and says: Here’s the stand that we want you to take, and it’s against this particular treatment, or against this doctor, they do what they’re told
——————————————————————
Yeah
——————————————————————
They do what they know best
Uh, my father-in-law, for instance, was, uh, also involved as a professor in these med centers
He taught nutrition, and he said it’s always a, been amazing to me that you can get through med school, and never take a class on, on nutrition
So you can become an M.D., and not understand the value, of nutrition, to a person’s health
That’s a problem
Uh, he recognized it as a problem
I recognize it as a problem because I particularly believe that most of our ill health is because how we treat our bodies
What we eat
——————————————————————
Mhmm
——————————————————————
Whether we exercise or don’t
Whether we provide our body with a way to flush the poisons or not
Uh, healthy living, and if you don’t teach our medical profession, healthy living, how can they teach their patients
——————————————————————
Mhmm
——————————————————————
So this, this whole system is, is just flawed in some ways, and weak in other ways, and, uh, controlled, for the purposes of commerce, instead of the public
——————————————————————
Yeah
So you, you think it’s a good idea treating people as an individual and finding out what they need as opposed to like carpet bombing them ?
——————————————————————
Absolutely
When we understood the, the individualized approach, here at the Burzynski Clinic, that they would take where they would test the cancer cells, uh, against all of these treatments and all of these chemotherapy treatments and, and anything else that might be out there that would, would treat cancer, and come back with a, a individualized care approach to the individualized cells of cancer that my mother has, that’s when we knew that we had to come here
We wondered, and I’ve told my friends, and everybody wonders, that oughta be the standard approach everywhere
Why wouldn’t you test, every cancer, and see what it is that’s gonna treat it best ?
You, you tell me
======================================
Doug Olson chats with Pete Cohen
January 2011
25:00
11/9/2012
——————————————————————

======================================

Posted in Cohen, Pete, Stanislaw Rajmund Burzynski | Tagged "apricot pits", "blood coagulation protein", "blood coagulation", "blood protein", "blood research", "blood therapy", "brain tumor", "cancer cell", "cancer cells", "cancer cure", "Cancer Drugs", "cancer treatment", "cancer treatments", "carpet bombing", "CAT scanned", "CAT scans", "chemotherapy drug", "county engineer", "dad’s cousin", "doctor’s protocol", "Doug Olson chats with Pete Cohen", "Doug Olson", "Dr. Burzynski", "Dr. Miller", "duculation therapy", "eyes crossed", "family’s", "father-in-law", "federal government", "good, "great aunt", "high school", "high-dose", "https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2014/01/10/pete-cohen-talks-with-doug-olson/", "ill health", "Laetrile injections", "Laetrile treatments", "large Pharma", "large pharmaceutical companies", "live blood", "local physician", "losing weight", "M.D.’s", "Mayo Clinic", "med centers", "med school", "medical profession", "mother’s", "New Years", "normal life", "Orden, "pancreatic cancer", "peach pits", "peer-reviewed", "person’s health", "Pete Cohen talks with Doug Olson https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2014/01/10/pete-cohen-talks-with-doug-olson/", "Pete Cohen", "Ph.D’s", "pharmaceutical company", "pharmaceutical corporations", "physician’s protocol", "record keeper", "side effect", "side effects", "state legislature", "stomach pain", "success rate", "summer job", "ulcer medicine", "ultra sounded", "vitamin B17", "Western Nebraska", absolutely, accept, access, accessible, accurate, affected, against, alive, allowed, amazing, amounts, Amygdalin, another, antineoplastic, antineoplaston, antineoplastons, apparently, applicable, applied, apply, approach, approved, Approximately, Arizona", aside, associated, ATTACK, attitude, authorizations, available, aware, “cancer patients", “Down, B17, bad, barriers, believe, below, best, better, blood, bodies, body, book, burn, burned, Burzynski Clinic, business, byproduct, CALLING, campaign, Cancer, cancerous, cancers, capital, care, Caris, certain, Certainly, charlatan, cheap, checked, chelation, Chemo, chemotherapies, CHEMOTHERAPY, child, Christmas, circumstances, class, clinic, clinics, closed, cobalt, collect, comfortable, comfortably, commented, commerce, completed, condition, consulted, contact, contacted, continued, contract, control, Controlled, conventional, cooperation, cousin, cured, curing, cyanide, cynical, dad, daughter, death, decided, Decides, declined, deemed, destroy, determine, determined, diagnosed, die, died, diet, different, digging, discovered, discussion, disease, Doctor, doctors, dosage, dosages, dose, doses, drug, drugs, during, earlier, easy, eat, effective, elected, encapsulated, encourage, enjoy, enzymes, eventually, evidence, examined, exercise, expected, experiences, expertise, eyes, family, fan, father, FDA, feeling, felt, financially, find, finding, flag, flawed, flow, flush, flyer, folks, follow, food, foods, found, fraud, frequent, friend, fund, funded, further, gal, games, generate, getting, grant, grants, group, growth, guaranteeing, Guy, halfway, hassling, health, healthy, help, her, high, Holidays, home, hospital, hospitals, house, Houston, Hoxsey, http://youtu.be/DO-MnxHBOis, hurt, husband, idea, illness, immediately, indicator, indigestion, individual, individualized, inflammation, information, injections, inoperable, instance, interested, interesting, introduce, introducing, involved, keeping, killers, kills, knew, knowing, knowledge, lab, laetrile, large, largest, leaflet, lemon, levels, license, life, like, liquid, list, listed, live, lived, liver, living, looking, lost, M.D.", married, material, medical, medications, medicines, mentioned, Mexico, mild, miserable, molecule, mom, money, mother, mum, naturally occurring, Nebraska, negative, nerves, nontoxic, nothing, noticed, nutrition, obligated, obviously, oncologist, oncologists, oncology, operable, operate, opinion, opposed, ORAL, order, ordinary, organizations, otherwise, outer, own, Oxaliplatin, painkillers, Pancreas, pancreatic, parents, part, particular, passed, patient, patients, pay, people, period, person, Ph.D, Pharma, physician, physicians, pills, planning, pocket, poisons, Politically correct, popular, portion, prescribes, present, probably, problem, problems, productive, PRODUCTS, Professor", properties, protein, proteins, protocol, proved, proves, provide, provided, public, pushed, quicker, RADIATION, raid, read, Reason, recognize, recognized, recovered, recruiting, regimen, regulate, regulated, related, Remain, remember, rented, reputations, research, researching, resistance, result, results", samples, saying, says, seemed, she, shell, shrink, shrunk, sick, signed, sister, size, smear, solve, speak, speaking, special, specimens, spoke, stand, started, starting, stomach, strong, stronger, subject, substance, success, suffering, supplement, suppressed, surprised, symptoms, system, taking, tasted, taught, tax, teach, test, testified, testing, Texas, thankfully, themselves, therapy, think, thinking, thousand, thrombosis, through, thrown, tied, tissue, told, town, toxic, traveling, travels, treat, treated, Treating, treatment, treatments, trials, trips, trust, trying, tumor, tumors, typically, ulcers, ultrasound, understand, understanding, understood, University, unpleasant, value, varied, violent, virtually, vitamin, weak, weekend, weight, wheelchair, whole, woman, work, worked, working, written, wrong, young, yourself | Leave a reply

USA TODAY and “The Skeptics” selling false hope to cancer patients

Posted on December 4, 2013 by didymusjudasthomas

Reply

——————————————————————
Irrespective Insolence
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
Hill ?

Sharon Hill ??

Does anyone know SHARON HILL ???
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
no ?

NoNo ??

NO NEVER MATTER
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
NOT HARDLY !

If it’s “Doubtful News”, that’s a “Hint and a Half” that it’s “Doubtful” it’s “News” [1]

In fact, I first received confirmation that what flows down-Hill was definitely, NO doubtfully, NOT news, when she displayed her “propensity” for “density” on #Forbes [2]
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
“Orac”, “The Skeptics™” Dope-on-a-Rope Pope. claimed:

4/19/2013 – “also obsessively read anything posted about Eric Merola or Stanislaw Burzynski on any social media.”
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
5/7/2013 – “If “Orac” was anywhere close to being 75% sure, I would have already reviewed “Doubtful News,” which received “free pub” on Forbes
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
“The Skeptics™” must have got into Liz Szabo’s ear, since she subsequently short-sheeted herself by being unable to answer her own question
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
Maybe Szabo shoulda asked the F.D.A. !!
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
All that Jerry Mosemak (@jmosemak), Connie Mosemak, and Mosemak Creative (@mosemakcreative) wanted to know was what Twitter thought of their Twerk
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
Bob Blaskiewicz, fresh off the AstroTurf campaign with “Orac’s” orifice, seemed ready to really be headed, right in to rectify on Liz’s
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
Liz, do you really want this anywhere around your backside ?
——————————————————————

——————————————————————
Bob-B obviously confused Liz Szabo with being a “journalist“, when she is a “reporter“

Ms. Szabo, is obviously NOT a “journalist”
——————————————————————
Liz Szabo (USA TODAY) – health reporter, medical reporter covering cancer, heart disease, pediatrics, public health, women’s health, kids/parenting, …
——————————————————————
The question is, how did a “reporter” like Liz Szabo, manage to get her name as the reporter “headlining” “The Skeptics™” “report,” instead of Robert Hanashiro ?

Hanashiro had under his belt:
——————————————————————
8/3/2011 – Urine test may help predict prostate cancer risk [4]
——————————————————————
The best Szabo could cite as support was:
——————————————————————
3/19/2008 – “Prostate cancer treatments’ sexual, urinary side effects compared” [5]
——————————————————————
Exactly how did Liz Szabo “win” that “pissing contest” ?

Even a monkey can report the news:

10/18/2013 – Monkeys ‘talk in turns’ [6]

If @LizSzabo wanted to do a REAL article on “selling false hope to cancer patients”, then USA TODAY should have done an “investigation” on something like THIS:
======================================
8/25/2010, Wednesday [7]
——————————————————————
Canadian Man Sentenced to 33 Months (2 years 9 months) in Prison for Selling Counterfeit Cancer Drugs Using the Internet

Hazim Gaber, 22, of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada sentenced in Phoenix, Arizona by U.S. District Court Judge James A. Teilborg

Ordered to pay $128,724 ($75,000 fine $53,724 in restitution)

Serve 3 years of supervised release following prison term for selling counterfeit cancer drugs using Internet
——————————————————————
6/30/2009 – indicted by federal grand jury in Phoenix, Arizona: 5 counts of wire fraud for selling counterfeit cancer drugs through website DCAdvice.com
——————————————————————
7/25/2009 – arrested Frankfurt, Germany
——————————————————————
12/18/2009 – extradited to United States
——————————————————————
5/2010 – plea hearing: admitted selling what he falsely claimed was experimental cancer drug sodium dichloroacetate, also known as DCA, to at least 65 victims (.10/2007 – 11/2007) in:
1. United States
2. Canada
3. United Kingdom
4. Belgium
5. the Netherlands

According to plea agreement, charged:
$23.68 for 10 grams of purported DCA
$45.52 for 20 grams
or
$110.27 for 100 grams
plus shipping

Admitted sent victims white powdery substance later determined through laboratory tests to contain:
1. dextrin
2. dextrose
3. lactose
4. starch
Contained no DCA

According to court documents, along with counterfeit DCA, packages also contained fraudulent certificate of analysis from fictitious laboratory and instructions on how dilute and ingest bogus DCA

DCA is experimental cancer drug not yet approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in United States

According to plea agreement knew that website DCAdvice.com contained false claims it was only legal supplier of DCA and falsely claimed it was associated with University of Alberta

According to information contained in plea agreement, DCA is odorless, colorless, inexpensive, relatively non-toxic experimental cancer drug highly sought by cancer patients

Doctor at University of Alberta in Canada published report in early 2007 summarizing results of study, which showed DCA caused regression in several cancers, including:
1. breast cancer
2. cancerous brain tumors
3. lung cancer

According to information contained in plea agreement, DCA cannot be prescribed by medical doctor in:
1. United States
or
2. Canada
since:
1. it is not approved for use in patients with cancer
2. nor is DCA available in pharmacies

As part of plea agreement, agreed to:
1. forfeit
or
2. cancel
any:
1. website
2. domain name
3. Internet services account
related to fraud scheme

“Hazim Gaber went from selling false hope to cancer patients to now spending 33 months in a U.S. prison,”

said Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of Criminal Division

“Criminals often seek to exploit the most vulnerable of victims – but offering fake, unapproved medication to cancer patients reaches a new low”

“Today’s sentence shows that cyber criminals who prey on the seriously ill cannot elude justice simply by committing crimes outside of our borders.”

“Gaber used the Internet to victimize people already suffering from the effects of cancer,”

said Dennis K. Burke, U.S. Attorney for District of Arizona

“Now he will go to prison for this bogus business and heartless fraud.”

“The FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office are committed to pursuing individuals who prey on those who are living with the affects of cancer,”

said Nathan Gray, Special Agent in Charge of FBI Phoenix Division

“Today’s sentencing illustrates international law enforcement partners working together to send a message not to use the Internet to perpetuate fraud, especially against those afflicted with a serious medical condition.”

Sentencing part of larger department-wide effort led by Department of Justice Task Force on Intellectual Property (IP Task Force)

Attorney General Eric Holder created IP Task Force to combat growing number of:
1. domestic
2. international
3. intellectual property crimes
protect:
1. health
2. safety
of American consumers
safeguard nation’s economic security against those who seek to profit illegally from American creativity, innovation and hard work

IP Task Force seeks to strengthen intellectual property rights protection through heightened:
1. civil enforcement
2. criminal enforcement
greater coordination among:
1. federal
2. state
3. local
law enforcement partners
increased focus on international enforcement efforts, including reinforcing relationships with key:
1. foreign partners
2. U.S. industry leaders

To learn more about IP Task Force, go to http://www.justice.gov/dag/iptaskforce/

Announced:
1. Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of Criminal Division
2. U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke for District of Arizona
3. FBI Special Agent in Charge of Phoenix Field Office Nathan T. Gray

Case prosecuted by:
1. Trial Attorney Thomas S. Dougherty of Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section
2. Assistant U.S. Attorney Peter Sexton of U.S. Attorney’s Office for District of Arizona

Significant assistance provided by:
1. Alberta Justice Office of Special Prosecutions-Edmonton
2. Alberta Partnership Against Cross Border Fraud
3. Competition Bureau of Canada
4. Edmonton Police Service
5. Federal Trade Commission
6. U.S. Postal Inspection Service

Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs provided assistance in case

Case investigated by Phoenix FBI Cyber Squad
10-958 Criminal Division
======================================
7/30/2013 – United States to Settle Cancer Research Grant Fraud [8]
——————————————————————
Northwestern University to Pay Nearly $3 Million to United States to Settle Cancer Research Grant Fraud Claims

$2.93 million – Northwestern University will pay United States to settle claims of cancer research grant fraud by former researcher and physician at university’s Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Center for Cancer in Chicago

Agreed to settlement in federal False Claims Act lawsuit after government investigated claims made by former employee and whistleblower who will receive portion of settlement

Alledgedly allowed researcher, Dr. Charles L. Bennett, to submit false claims under research grants from National Institutes of Health

Settlement covers improper claims Dr. Bennett submitted for reimbursement from federal grants (1/1/2003 – 8/31/2010) for:
1. food
2. hotels
3. travel
4. other expenses
5. professional and consulting services
6. subcontracts
that benefited:
1. Dr. Bennett
2. family
3. friends

Allegations made in civil lawsuit filed under seal 2009 by Melissa Theis, (2007 and 2008) worked as purchasing coordinator in hematology and oncology at Northwestern’s Feinberg School of Medicine, will receive $498,100 in settlement proceeds

Suit named defendants:
1. Dr. Bennett
2. Dr. Steven T. Rosen
3. Lurie Cancer Center
4. Northwestern

Alleged defendants submitted false claims to United States when:
1. Dr. Bennett
2. Dr. Rosen
directed and authorized spending of grant funds on goods and services that did not meet applicable NIH and government grant guidelines

Government contends has certain civil claims against Northwestern arising out of Northwestern’s improper submission of claims to NIH for grant expenditures for items that were for personal benefit of:
1. Dr. Bennett
2. family
3. friends
incurred in connection with grants as to which he was principal investigator

Northwestern, fully cooperated during investigation, did not admit liability as part of settlement

Agreement releases university and all its affiliates and employees, other than Dr. Bennett, from claims made in whistleblower lawsuit

Northwestern agreed to pay settlement within 14 business days

Agreement covers allegations university submitted false claims to NIH for costs Dr. Bennett incurred on grant-funded research projects involving:
1. adverse drug-events
2. blood disorder known as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
3. multiple myeloma drugs
4. quality of care for cancer patients

Dr. Bennett allegedly billed federal grants for:
1. family trips
2. meals
3. hotels
for
1. himself
2. friends
and “consulting fees” for unqualified:
1. friends
2. family members
including:
1. brother
2. cousin

At Dr. Bennett’s request, Northwestern allegedly improperly subcontracted with various universities for services that were paid for by NIH grants

Allegations investigated by:
1. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2. National Institutes of Health
3. U.S. Attorney’s Office
4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General

“Allowing researchers to use federal grant money to pay for personal travel, hotels, and meals, and to hire unqualified friends and relatives as ‘consultants’ violates the public’s trust,”

said Gary S. Shapiro, United States Attorney for Northern District of Illinois

“This settlement, combined with the willingness of insiders to report fraud, should help deter such misconduct, but when it doesn’t, federal grant recipients who allow the system to be manipulated should know that we will aggressively pursue all available legal remedies,”

he added

“The mismanagement or improper expenditure of grant funds is unacceptable and will not be tolerated,”

said Lamont Pugh III, Special Agent-in-Charge of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General – Chicago Region

“The OIG will continue to diligently investigate allegations of this nature to ensure that taxpayer dollars are being properly utilized.”

Cory B. Nelson, Special Agent-in-Charge of Chicago Office of Federal Bureau of Investigation said:

“The FBI takes allegations of fraud seriously, especially those allegations from insiders who are often in the best position to detect wrongdoing long before it would otherwise come to the attention of law enforcement.”

United States represented by:
Assistant U.S. Attorney Kurt N. Lindland

Under federal False Claims Act, defendants may be liable for triple amount of actual damages and civil penalties between $5,500 and $11,000 for each violation

Individual whistleblowers may be eligible to receive between 15 and 30 percent of amount of any recovery
======================================
Show EmorME the Money ! [9]
——————————————————————
8/28/2013, Wednesday

$1.5 Million – Emory University False Claims Act Investigation

University Overbilled Medicare and Medicaid for Patients Enrolled in Clinical Trial Research at Emory’s Winship Cancer Institute

Settlement with Emory University

$1.5 million – agreed to pay to settle claims it violated False Claims Act by billing:
1. Medicaid
2. Medicare
for clinical trial services not permitted by:
1. Medicaid rules
2. Medicare rules

Providers generally not permitted to bill Medicare for medical care and services for which clinical trial sponsor agreed to pay

1. United States
2. State of Georgia
alleged Emory University billed:
1. Medicaid
2. Medicare
for services clinical trial sponsor agreed to pay

(and, in some cases, actually did pay, thereby resulting in Emory’s being paid twice for the same service)

Investigation of Emory University revealed institution’s clinical trial false billing and led to settlement

Civil settlement resolves lawsuit filed by Elizabeth Elliot under qui tam, whistleblower, provisions of False Claims Act

Ms. Elliot will receive share of settlement payment that resolves qui tam suit

United States Attorney’s Office for Northern District of Georgia
Attorney General Sam Olens announced reached settlement

“This settlement demonstrates our office’s continued commitment to protect crucial Medicare and Medicaid dollars,”

said United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates

“Treatment of cancer is expensive, and Medicare and Medicaid dollars should be reserved for patients who need services that properly may be billed to these programs.”

“Our investigation of Emory University revealed the institution’s clinical trial false billing and led to today’s settlement,”

said Derrick L. Jackson, Special Agent in Charge of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General for Atlanta region

“Protecting Medicare — and taxpayer dollars — remains a top priority.”

Mark F. Giuliano, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Atlanta Field Office, stated:

“Federal funds, to include those of Medicare and Medicaid, are limited and are to be used as intended”

“The FBI will continue to play a role in enforcing federal law that governs the use of these much needed funds.”

Attorney General Sam Olens stated,

“Cancer research is paramount to saving and extending lives”

“However, strict rules govern the use of Georgia Medicaid dollars”

“My office takes seriously its obligation to ensure that these resources are used properly.”

Case investigated by:
1. Federal Bureau of Investigation
2. Georgia Medicaid Fraud Control Unit
3. United States Attorney’s Office for Northern District of Georgia
4. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Inspector General

Civil settlement reached by Assistant United States Attorney Darcy F. Coty

For further information please contact U.S. Attorney’s Public Affairs Office at USAGAN.PressEmails@usdoj.gov

Internet address for HomePage for U.S. Attorney’s Office for Northern District of Georgia
http://www.justice.gov/usao/gan.
Emory Settlement Agreement
======================================
5/24/1993 – Court Testimony Of Nicholas Patronas, MD:
——————————————————————
Pg. 122
——————————————————————
“We have done– we have an experimental protocol at the NIH where we inject a chemotherapeutic agent through the carotid artery, the artery that goes to the brain, and we have three survivals with this technique, by providing massive amounts of chemotherapeutic drugs to the brain that harbors the tumor“

“And we destroy the tumor, but we destroy a large part of the brain as well, and the patients became severely handicapped, and a life that’s not worth living“
——————————————————————
Pg. 123
——————————————————————
“And so I have three cases with this particular experimental protocol which resulted in killing the tumor, but a large part of the healthy brain as well“

“So overall the protocol was abandoned and is not any more in effect because of the serious side effects that we witnessed”
——————————————————————
Nicholas J. Patronas
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
http://www.cc.nih.gov/drd/staff/nicholas_patronas.html
——————————————————————
Sharon Hill, you’re just a footnote to this article, because all you did was “cut-and-paste”, and try to pass off David H. Gorski, M.D., Ph.D., FACS and Bob Blaskiewicz as “reliable sources”

You’ve gotta be kidding me !!!
——————————————————————
P.S. A fifth-grader can “cut-and-paste”

Are you smarter than a 5th-grader ?
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – 11/15/2013 – Burzynski exposed in USA Today:
——————————————————————
http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/11/burzynski-exposed-in-usa-today/
======================================
[2] – 5/6/2013 – Critiquing “The Skeptic” Burzynski Critics: A Film Producer, A Cancer Doctor, And Their Critics (page 10):
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/critiquing-the-skeptic-burzynski-critics-a-film-producer-a-cancer-doctor-and-their-critics-page-10/
======================================
[3] – 5/7/2013 – Critiquing: Is Eric Merola issuing bogus DMCA takedown notices against critics of Stanislaw Burzynski?:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/critiquing-is-eric-merola-issuing-bogus-dmca-takedown-notices-against-critics-of-stanislaw-burzynski/
======================================
[4] – 8/3/2011 – Urine test may help predict prostate cancer risk:
——————————————————————
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/cancer/story/2011/08/Urine-test-may-help-predict-prostate-cancer-risk/49790014/1?fullsite=true
——————————————————————
http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/cancer/story/2011/08/Urine-test-may-help-predict-prostate-cancer-risk/49790014/1
======================================
[5] – 3/19/2008 – “Prostate cancer treatments’ sexual, urinary side effects compared”:
——————————————————————
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-03-19-prostate-cancer_N.htm
======================================
[6] – 10/18/2013 – Monkeys ‘talk in turns’:
——————————————————————
http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2013/10/131018_witn_monkeys.shtml
======================================
[7] – 8/2010
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/August/10-crm-958.html
======================================
[8] – 7/30/2013
——————————————————————

http://www.justice.gov/usao/iln/pr/chicago/2013/pr0730_01.html
======================================
[9] – 8/28/2013 – Emory University
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/usao/gan/press/2013/08-28-13b.html
======================================
[10] – 5/24/1993
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/5241993-court-testimony-of-nicholas-petronas-md/
======================================

Posted in bias, biased, Bob Blaskiewicz (Robert J. Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz), critique, critiques, critiqued, critiquing, Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Forbes #Forbes, Gorski ScienceBlogs.com/Insolence ScienceBasedMedicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Nicholas Patronas, M.D., Stanislaw Rajmund Burzynski, The Skeptics, USA TODAY | Tagged ", "10-958 Criminal Division", "75%", "@mosemakcreative", "@NDILnews", "A look at a doctor's cancer claims", "adverse drug-events", "agreed to pay", "Alberta Justice Office of Special Prosecutions-Edmonton", "Alberta Partnership Against Cross Border Fraud", "Alexander J. Walt Comprehensive Breast Center", "Alleged defendants submitted false claims", "American College of Surgeons Committee on Cancer", "American consumers", "Ann Karmanos Cancer Center", "Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute", "Assistant Attorney General Lanny A. Breuer of Criminal Division", "Assistant U.S. Attorney Kurt N. Lindland", "Assistant U.S. Attorney Peter Sexton of U.S. Attorney’s Office for District of Arizona", "Assistant United States Attorney Darcy F. Coty", "Associate Professor of Surgery and Oncology at the Wayne State University School of Medicine, "AstroTurf campaign", "Attorney General Eric Holder", "Attorney General Sam Olens", "Attorney's", "Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Center / Institute", "Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute", "bbc.co.uk/", "blogger at skepticalhumanities.com", "Bob Blaskiewicz Faux Skeptic Exposed!", "brain that harbors the tumor“ destroy, "breast cancer", "Burzynski exposed in USA Today", "Cancer Drugs", "Cancer Liaison Physician for the American College of Surgeons Committee on Cancer", "cancer research grant fraud", "cancer research", "cancerous brain tumors", "carotid artery", "Center for Inquiry", "chemotherapeutic agent", "chemotherapeutic drugs", "Chicago Office", "civil actions", "CIVIL CLAIMS", "civil enforcement", "civil lawsuit", "civil settlement", "Clinical Trial Research", "clinical trial services", "clinical trial sponsor", "Committee for Skeptical Inquiry", "Competition Bureau of Canada", "Connie Mosemak", "Cory B. Nelson, "Court Testimony Of Nicholas Patronas, "Criminal Division’s Office of International Affairs", "Critiquing The Skeptic Burzynski Critics: A Film Producer, "Critiquing: Is Eric Merola issuing bogus DMCA takedown notices against critics of Stanislaw Burzynski?", "cyber criminals", "D.C.A.", "D.H. Gorski", "DCA is experimental cancer drug not yet approved by U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in United States", "DCA is odorless, "DCAdvice.com", "Dennis K. Burke, "Department of Justice Task Force on Intellectual Property", "department-wide effort", "Derrick L. Jackson", "destroy a large part of the brain", "DH Gorski", "Didymus Judas Thomas’ Hipocritical Oath Blog", "Doctor accused of selling false hope to families" http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy/2994561/, "Doctor at University of Alberta in Canada published report in early 2007 summarizing results of study, "domain name", "Dope-on-a-Rope Pope", "Doubtful News”, "doubtfulnews.com/" "http://doubtfulnews.com/", "doubtfulnews.tumblr.com/post/", "doubtfulnews.tumblr.com/post/67054971107/", "doubtfulnews.tumblr.com/post/67054971107/burzynski-exposed-in-usa-today-front-page-exposure", "Dr. Bennett", "Dr. Bennett’s", "Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski", "Dr. Rosen", "Dr. Steven T. Rosen", "Eau Claire", "Edmonton, "Edmonton Police Service", "Elizabeth Elliot", "Emory University", "Emory’s Winship Cancer Institute", "Emory’s", "experimental protocol", "Experts dismiss doctor’s cancer claims", "F.B.I.", "F.C.A.", "False Claims Act Investigation", "False Claims Act", "false claims", "Families run out of hope, "family members", "family trips", "FBI Special Agent in Charge of Phoenix Field Office Nathan T. Gray", "Federal Bureau of Investigation", "federal False Claims Act lawsuit", "federal funds", "federal grant money", "Federal grant", "Federal Grants", "Federal Trade Commission", "Field Office", "foreign partners", "former researcher", "fraud scheme", "free pub”, "Gary S. Shapiro, "Georgia Medicaid Fraud Control Unit", "government grant guidelines", "grant-funded", "hard work", "Hazim Gaber", "healthy brain", "heartless fraud", "http://bbc.co.uk/", "http://bbc.co.uk/worldservice/", "http://bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/", "http://bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/", "http://bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/", "http://bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2013/", "http://bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2013/10/", "http://bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2013/10/131018_witn_monkeys.shtml", "http://cc.nih.gov/" "http://www.cc.nih.gov/" "http://cc.nih.gov/drd/", "http://cc.nih.gov/drd/staff/", "http://cc.nih.gov/drd/staff/nicholas_patronas.html", "http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/", "http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/11/", "http://doubtfulnews.com/2013/11/burzynski-exposed-in-usa-today/", "http://doubtfulnews.tumblr.com/" "doubtfulnews.tumblr.com/", "http://doubtfulnews.tumblr.com/post/", "http://doubtfulnews.tumblr.com/post/67054971107/", "http://doubtfulnews.tumblr.com/post/67054971107/burzynski-exposed-in-usa-today-front-page-exposure", "http://justice.gov/dag/", "http://justice.gov/dag/iptaskforce/", "http://justice.gov/opa/" "http://www.justice.gov/opa/", "http://justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/August/", "http://justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/August/10-crm-958.html", "http://justice.gov/usao/gan/", "http://justice.gov/usao/gan/press/", "http://justice.gov/usao/gan/press/2013/", "http://justice.gov/usao/gan/press/2013/08-28-13b.html", "http://justice.gov/usao/iln/", "http://justice.gov/usao/iln/pr/chicago/", "http://justice.gov/usao/iln/pr/chicago/2013/", "http://justice.gov/usao/iln/pr/chicago/2013/pr0730_01.html", "https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/06/critiquing-the-skeptic-burzynski-critics-a-film-producer-a-cancer-doctor-and-their-critics-page-10/", "https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/critiquing-is-eric-merola-issuing-bogus-dmca-takedown-notices-against-critics-of-stanislaw-burzynski/", "https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/5241993-court-testimony-of-nicholas-petronas-md/", "https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/12/04/usa-today-and-the-skeptics-selling-false-hope-to-cancer-patients/", "http://usatoday.com/news/", "http://usatoday.com/news/health/", "http://usatoday.com/news/health/medical/", "http://usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/", "http://usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/", "http://usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/cancer/", "http://usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/cancer/story/", "http://usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/cancer/story/2011/", "http://usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/cancer/story/2011/08/", "http://usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/cancer/story/2011/08/Urine-test-may-help-predict-prostate-cancer-risk/", "http://usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/cancer/story/2011/08/Urine-test-may-help-predict-prostate-cancer-risk/49790014/1", "http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/", "http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/", "http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/", "http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-03-19-prostate-cancer_N.htm", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2013/10/", "http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2013/10/131018_witn_monkeys.shtml", "http://www.cc.nih.gov/drd/", "http://www.cc.nih.gov/drd/staff/", "http://www.cc.nih.gov/drd/staff/nicholas_patronas.html", "http://www.justice.gov/dag/", "http://www.justice.gov/dag/iptaskforce/", "http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/" "http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/August/", "http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/August/10-crm-958.html", "http://www.justice.gov/usao/gan/", "http://www.justice.gov/usao/gan/press/", "http://www.justice.gov/usao/gan/press/2013/", "http://www.justice.gov/usao/gan/press/2013/08-28-13b.html", "http://www.justice.gov/usao/iln/", "http://www.justice.gov/usao/iln/pr/", "http://www.justice.gov/usao/iln/pr/chicago/", "http://www.justice.gov/usao/iln/pr/chicago/2013/", "http://www.justice.gov/usao/iln/pr/chicago/2013/pr0730_01.html", "http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/medical/health/medical/cancer/story/2011/08/Urine-test-may-help-predict-prostate-cancer-risk/49790014/1", "https://mobile.twitter.com/cmosemak", "https://mobile.twitter.com/jmosemak", "https://mobile.twitter.com/LizSzabo", "IMMEDIATE RELEASE", "Institute for Science in Medicine", "intellectual property rights", "international law enforcement partners", "Internet services account", "IP Task Force", "IP TaskForce", "Jerry Mosemak", "JREF Swift Blog contributor", "Lamont Pugh III, "large part", "law enforcement", "life that’s not worth living“, "Liz Szabo (USA TODAY) – health reporter, "Liz Szabo's", "lung cancer", "Lurie Cancer Center", "Mark F. Giuliano", "Medicaid rules", "medical care", "Medical Director of the Alexander J. Walt Comprehensive Breast Center", "medical doctor", "Medicare rules", "Melissa Theis", "member of the faculty of the Graduate Program in Cancer Biology", "Michael Stravato", "Monkeys talk in turns", "Mosemak Creative", "Ms. Elliot", "Ms. Szabo", "multiple myeloma drugs", "N.I.H.", "Nathan Gray, "National Geographic", "nation’s economic security", "Nicholas J. Patronas", "NIH grants", "Northeast Conference on Science and Skepticism", "Northwestern University", "Northwestern’s Feinberg School of Medicine", "Northwestern’s", "not approved for use in patients with cancer", "offering fake, "pass off", "perpetuate fraud", "personal travel", "Phoenix FBI Cyber Squad", "plea agreement", "principal investigator", "prison term", "professional and consulting services", "prostate cancer", "public’s", "quality of care for cancer patients", "qui tam suit", "qui tam", "report the news", "research grants", "Robert Hanashiro", "Science or snake oil?", "ScienceBasedMedicine . org", "selling counterfeit cancer drugs", "serious medical condition", "Serious side effects", "seriously ill", "settlement payment", "short-sheeted", "side effects compared”, "Skeptical Inquirer", "Skeptical Inquiry", "Skepticality podcast", "Special Agent", "St. Louis, "State of Georgia", "submit false claims", "taxpayer dollars", "The Skeptic", "The Virtual Skeptics", "thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura", "today’s settlement", "Todd Plitt", "Treasurer for the Institute for Science in Medicine", "Trial Attorney Thomas S. Dougherty of Criminal Division’s Computer Crime and Intellectual Property Section", "U.S. Attorney Dennis Burke for District of Arizona", "U.S. Attorney’s Office for Northern District of Georgia", "U.S. Attorney’s Office", "U.S. Attorney’s Public Affairs Office", "U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, "U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General", "U.S. District Court Judge James A. Teilborg", "U.S. industry leaders", "U.S. Postal Inspection Service", "U.S. prison", "U.S.", "United State", "United States Attorney Sally Quillian Yates", "United States Attorney’s Office for Northern District of Georgia", "University of Alberta", "University of Michigan" Gorski http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Gorski, "University of Wisconsin", "university’s Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Center for Cancer in Chicago", "Urine test may help predict prostate cancer risk", "US DOJ", "USA TODAY and The Skeptics™: selling false hope to cancer patients https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/12/04/usa-today-and-the-skeptics-selling-false-hope-to-cancer-patients/", "USA TODAY NEWS, "USA TODAY", "USAGAN.PressEmails@usdoj.gov", "usatoday.com/", "usatoday30.usatoday.com/", "Visiting Assistant Professor of Writing at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire", "Wayne State University School of Medicine", "Wayne State University", "web columnist", "whistleblower lawsuit", "www.bbc.co.uk/", "www.cc.nih.gov/", "www.justice.gov/dag/", #sciencebasedmedicine, @gorskon, @oracknows, @ScienceBasedMed, A Cancer Doctor, abandoned, about, abuse, Academically, Act, actual, actually, address, admit, Affairs, affects, affiliates, afflicted, against, agent, aggressively, agreed, agreement, Alberta, Alledgedly, allegation, allegations, alleged, allegedly, allow, allowed, Allowing, already, also, ALTERNATIVE, American, among, amount, amounts, And Their Critics (page 10)", announced, answer, any, anyone, anything, anywhere, applicable, are, arising, Arizona", around, artery, article, asked, assistance, associated, Atlanta, attention, authorized, available, “Bob B.", “cancer patients", “Conspiracy Guy”, “consulting fees”, “cut-and-paste”, “Hint and a Half”, “However, “Our only goal is to promote high standards of science in medicine”, “pissing contest”, “Prostate cancer treatments’ sexual, “reliable sources”, “selling false hope to cancer patients”, “The Skeptics™”: "selling false hope to cancer patients", backside, been, behalf, being, belt, benefited, best, between, bias, Biased, bill, billed, billing, Blatherskitewicz, blood disorder", Bob Blaskiewicz, bogus, borders, brain, Briefing, bring, brother, business, can, Canada, Canadian, cancel, Cancer, cancers, cannot, case, cases, certain, Charge, CHICAGO, Chief of the Section of Breast Surgery", cite, citizens, civil, claimed, claims, Clinical, Clinical Trial, Clinical Trials, close, cmosemak, colorless, combat, combined, come, commitment, committed, committing, confirmation, confused, connection, consultants, CONSUMER, contact, contained, contends, continue, continued, cooperated, coordination, coordinator, costs, could, Counterfeit, cousin, covers, created, creativity, crimes, criminal, criminals, critique, critiqued, critiques, Critiquing, crucial, D.", D.H.", damages, David Gorski, David H. Gorski, Defendants, definitely, demonstrates, density, department, detect, deter, determination, Detroit, DH", diligently, directed, displayed, Doctor, does, dollars, domestic, Doubtful, doubtfully, Dr. Charles L. Bennett", Dr. David H. Gorski, during, each, ear, effect, Effects, efforts, eligible, elude, EmorME, Emory, employee, employees, enforcement, enforcing, Enrolled, ensure, Eric Merola, especially, even, exactly, Expenditure, expenditures, expenses, expensive, experimental, exploit, extending, F.D.A., Facebook, FACS", fact, false, falsely, FBI, Federal, federal law, filed, fine, flows "down-Hill", focus, following, food, footnote, Forbes, forfeit, former, fraud, fresh, friend, friends, fully, funds, further, Gannett, generally, Georgia, goes, goods, Gorski, got, gotta, govern, government, governs, grant, grants, greater, growing, had, handicapped, hardly, Has, have, headed, headlining, health, heart disease, heightened, help, hematology, her, highly, himself, hire, HomePage, hotels, http//www.sciencebasedmedicine.org, http://anp4all.com, http://blog.rbutr.com/, http://cancerbiologyprogram.med.wayne.edu/, http://cancerbiologyprogram.med.wayne.edu/faculty/, http://cancerbiologyprogram.med.wayne.edu/faculty/gorski.php, http://centerforinquiry.net/speakers/blaskiewicz_bob, http://justice.gov/, http://justice.gov/opa/pr/, http://justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/, http://justice.gov/usao/, http://karmanos.org/Physicians/Details.aspx?sid=1&physician=70, http://lanyrd.com/2013/tam/sckkdy/, http://med.wayne.edu/, http://med.wayne.edu/surgery/, http://med.wayne.edu/surgery/faculty/DGorski.html, http://ncas.org/2013/02/mar-9-david-h-gorski-quackademic.html?m=1, http://necss.org/speakers/bob-blaskiewicz/, http://prognosis.med.wayne.edu/article/dr-gorski-named-codirector-of-michigan-breast-oncology-quality-initiative, http://rbutr.com/, http://sciencebasedmedicine.org, http://sciencebasedmedicine.org/editorial-staff/, http://sciencebasedmedicine.org/editorial-staff/david-h-gorski-md-phd-managing-editor/, http://scienceblogs.com/, http://scienceblogs.com/Insolence, http://skepticalhumanities.com/, http://thehoustoncancerquack.com/, http://usatoday.com/, http://usatoday.com/story/, http://usatoday.com/story/news/, http://usatoday.com/story/news/nation/, http://usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/, http://usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/burzynski-cancer-science/, http://usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/burzynski-cancer-science/2994731/, http://usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/jeanine-graf-cancer-children/, http://usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy/, http://usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy/2994561/, http://uwec.edu/Staff/blaskir/, http://virtualskeptics.com/, http://whybiotech.com/?p=3808, http://wsusurgery.com/facultyc3/david-gorski/, http://wsusurgery.com/research-team-dr-gorski/, http://www.cancerbiologyprogram.med.wayne.edu/, http://www.cancerbiologyprogram.med.wayne.edu/faculty/, http://www.cancerbiologyprogram.med.wayne.edu/faculty/gorski.php, http://www.centerforinquiry.net/speakers/blaskiewicz_bob, http://www.csicop.org/author/rblaskiewicz, http://www.justice.gov/, http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/, http://www.justice.gov/usao/, http://www.justice.gov/usao/gan. "Emory Settlement Agreement", http://www.karmanos.org/Physicians/Details.aspx?sid=1&physician=70, http://www.med.wayne.edu/, http://www.med.wayne.edu/surgery/faculty/, http://www.med.wayne.edu/surgery/faculty/DGorski.html, http://www.ncas.org/2013/02/mar-9-david-h-gorski-quackademic.html?m=1, http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/editorial-staff/, http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/editorial-staff/david-h-gorski-md-phd-managing-editor/, http://www.scienceblogs.com/, http://www.scienceblogs.com/Insolence, http://www.skepticalhumanities.com, http://www.usatoday.com/, http://www.usatoday.com/story/, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/burzynski-cancer-science/, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/burzynski-cancer-science/2994731/, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/jeanine-graf-cancer-children/2994675/ http://usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/jeanine-graf-cancer-children/2994675/ http://www.usatoday.co, http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy/, http://www.uwec.edu/Staff/blaskir/, http://www.whybiotech.com/?p=3808, http://www.wsusurgery.com/facultyc3/david-gorski/, http://www.wsusurgery.com/research-team-dr-gorski/, https://mobile.twitter.com/, https://mobile.twitter.com/gorskon, https://mobile.twitter.com/oracknows, https://mobile.twitter.com/rjblaskiewicz, https://mobile.twitter.com/ScienceBasedMed, https://twitter.com/, https://twitter.com/gorskon, https://twitter.com/oracknows, https://twitter.com/ScienceBasedMed, https://www.twitter.com/gorskon, https://www.twitter.com/oracknows, https://www.twitter.com/ScienceBasedMed, illegally, illustrates, IMMEDIATE, improper, improperly, include, including, increased, incurred, individual, individuals, inexpensive, information, Inject, innovation, insiders, Insolence, instead, institutions, intellectual property crimes", intended, international, Internet, into, investigated, investigates, investigation, involving, Irrespective, items, jmosemak, journalist, Justice, key, kidding, kids/parenting", killing, know, larger, law, lawsuit, learn, led, legal, liability, liable, Lies, limited, lives, living, Liz Szabo, LizSzabo, local, long, M.D.", made, man", manage, manipulated, massive, matter, may, Maybe, MD", meals, media, Medicaid, medical reporter covering cancer, Medicare, medicine, meet, message, Michigan, million, misconduct, mismanagement, Missouri", money, money after cancer treatments", monkey, months, more, most, much, must, name, named, NatGeo, NATION, National Institutes of Health, nature, need, needed, never, news, NIH, no, NoNo, nor, Northwestern, Not, now, number, obligation, obsessively, obtained, obvious, obviously, off, office, OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL, offices, often, OIG, oncology, only, Orac, Oracolyte, Oracolytes, Ordered, orifice, otherwise, Our, outside, overall, Overbilled, own, paid, paramount, part, particular, partners, patients, pay, payment, pediatrics, penalties, people, percent, permitted, personal benefit", Ph.D, pharmacies, PhD, Phoenix, physician, play, please, portion, position, posted, predict, prescribed, press, prey, preys, priority, prison, private, proceeds, PRODUCTS, profit, programs, projects, propensity, properly, prosecuted, prostate, protect, protecting, protection, protocol, protocols, provided, Providers, providing, provisions, pseudoscience, public, public health, purchasing, pursue, pursuing, question, questionable, r-but-r, rbutr, reached, ready, real, really, receive, received, recipients, recovery, rectify, region, reimbursement, reinforcing, related, relationships, relatively non-toxic experimental cancer drug", relatives, release, releases, remains, remedies, report, reported, reporter, reports, represented, request, research, researcher, researchers, reserved, resolves, resources, Respectful Insolence, restitution, resulted, resulting, Revealed!, reviewed, right ?", risk, rjblatherskiewicz, role, Room, rules, safeguard, safety, said, same, saving, scienceblogs, seal, seek, seeks, seemed, Selling, send, sentence, sentenced, Sentencing, seriously, serve, service, services, settle, settled, settlement, severely, sexual, share, Sharon Hill, she, should, show, shows, significant, simply, since, Skeptical Humanities, skepticalhumanities, social, some, something, sought, special, Special Agent in Charge of FBI Phoenix Division", Special Agent-in-Charge", spending, sponsor, Stanislaw Burzynski, State, stated, strengthen, strict, subcontracted, subcontracts, submission, submitted, submitted false claims", subsequently, such, suffering, Suit, supervised, supplier, support, sure, survivals, system, takes, taxpayer, technique, test, that, The Skeptics, their, there, thereby, these, those, thought, through, today, together, tolerated, travel, treatment, treatments, trial, triple, trust, try, tumor, Twerk, twice, Twitter, U.S. Attorney for District of Arizona", U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, unable, unacceptable, unapproved medication to cancer patients reaches a new low”, Under”, United States, United States Attorney for Northern District of Illinois", universities, University, unqualified, urinary, urinary side effects compared”, urine, US, USA, USDOJ, use, used, using, utilized, various, victimize, victims, violated, violates, violation, virtualskeptics, vulnerable, wanted, was, WASHINGTON, website, WHAT, when reporter, which, which showed DCA caused regression in several cancers", whistleblower, whistleblowers, will, willingness, win, Wisconsin" http://uwec.edu/Staff/blaskir/, with, within, witnessed, women’s health, worked, working, would, wrongdoing, www.justice.gov/, Years, your | Leave a reply

All’s fair in Drugs and War

Posted on November 27, 2013 by didymusjudasthomas

Reply

======================================
GlaxoSmithKline
======================================
$3 BILLION
——————————————————————
7/2/2012
——————————————————————
(4/1998 – 8/2003)
——————————————————————
United States alleges GSK participated in
preparing
publishing
distributing
misleading medical journal article that misreported that clinical trial of drug demonstrated efficacy in treatment when study failed to demonstrate efficacy
——————————————————————
At same time, United States alleges, GSK didn’t make available data from 2 other studies in which drug also failed to demonstrate efficacy
——————————————————————
(2001 – 2007)
——————————————————————
United States alleges GSK failed to include certain safety data about drug in reports to FDA meant to allow FDA to determine if drug continues to be safe for approved indications and to spot drug safety trends
——————————————————————
missing information included data regarding certain post-marketing studies
——————————————————————
data regarding 2 studies undertaken in response to European regulators’ concerns about safety of drug
——————————————————————
United States alleges GSK stated drug had positive cholesterol profile despite having no well-controlled studies to support that message
======================================

======================================
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and subsidiaries, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Scios Inc.
Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, L.P.
======================================
$2.2 BILLION +
——————————————————————
11/4/2013, Monday
——————————————————————
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and Janssen
——————————————————————
complaint alleges J&J and Janssen were aware drug posed serious health risks, but companies downplayed these risks
——————————————————————
For example, when J&J study of drug showed significant risk of strokes and other adverse events in patients, complaint alleges Janssen combined study data with other studies to make it appear there was lower overall risk of adverse events
——————————————————————
year after J&J received results of 2nd study confirming increased safety risk for patients taking drug, but hadn’t published data, one physician who worked on study cautioned Janssen
——————————————————————
“[a]t this point, so long after [the study] has been completed … we must be concerned that this gives the strong appearance that Janssen is purposely withholding the findings.”
——————————————————————
complaint alleges Janssen knew patients taking drug had increased risk, but nonetheless promoted drug as “uncompromised by safety concerns”
——————————————————————
When Janssen received initial results of studies indicating drug posed same risk as other antipsychotics, complaint alleges company retained outside consultants to re-analyze study results and ultimately published articles stating drug was actually associated with lower risk
——————————————————————
J&J and another of its subsidiaries, Scios Inc.
——————————————————————
8/2001 – FDA approved drug to treat patients with acutely decompensated congestive heart failure who have shortness of breath at rest or with minimal activity
——————————————————————
approval based on study involving hospitalized patients experiencing severe heart failure who received infusions of drug over average 36-hour period
——————————————————————
complaint alleged Scios had no sound scientific evidence supporting medical necessity of outpatient infusions and misleadingly used small pilot study to encourage serial outpatient use of drug
======================================

======================================
Abbott Laboratories Inc.
======================================
$1.5 BILLION
——————————————————————
5/7/2012, Monday
——————————————————————
(2001 – 2006)
——————————————————————
company marketed drug in combination with atypical antipsychotic drugs even after its clinical trials failed to demonstrate adding drug was any more effective than atypical antipsychotic alone for that use
——————————————————————
1999 – forced to discontinue clinical trial of drug due to increased incidence of adverse events, including
somnolence
dehydration
anorexia
experienced by study participants administered drug
——————————————————————
funded 2 studies of use of drug
both failed to meet main goals established for the study
——————————————————————
When 2nd study failed to show statistically significant treatment difference between antipsychotic drugs used in combination with drug and antipsychotic drugs alone, waited nearly 2 years to notify sales force about study results and another 2 years to publish results
======================================

======================================
AstraZeneca LP / AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
======================================
$520 MILLION
——————————————————————
4/27/2010, Tuesday
——————————————————————
engaged doctors to conduct studies on unapproved uses of drug
——————————————————————
recruited doctors to serve as authors of articles that were ghostwritten by medical literature companies and about studies doctors in question didn’t conduct
——————————————————————
then used
studies
articles
as basis for promotional messages about unapproved uses of drug
======================================
REFERENCE:
======================================
11/26/2013 – United States Department of Justice (DOJ) versus BIG Pharma: BIG Pharma fought the law, and the law won ?:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/26/united-states-department-of-justice-versus-big-pharma-big-pharma-fought-the-law-and-the-law-won/
======================================

Posted in BIG Pharma, critique, critiques, critiqued, critiquing, research | Tagged "(GSK)", "(JandJ)", "Abbott Laboratories Inc.", "adverse events", "All’s fair in Drugs and War https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/27/alls-fair-in-drugs-and-war/", "All’s fair in Drugs and War", "antipsychotic drugs", "AstraZeneca LP", "AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP", "atypical antipsychotic", "drug safety trends", "G.S.K.", "Glaxo-Smith-Kline", "increased risk", "J & J", "J&J", "Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, "Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc.", "Johnson & Johnson (J&J)", "lower risk", "main goals", "medical journal article", "medical literature companies", "no sound scientific evidence", "pilot study", "post-marketing studies", "re-analyze", "regulators’", "safety risk", "sales force", "Scios Inc.", "study data", "study results", "U.S. Department of Justice", "U.S.", "U.S.D.O.J.", "unapproved uses of drug", "United States Department of Justice (DOJ) versus BIG Pharma: BIG Pharma fought the law, "United States Department of Justice (DOJ)", "US DOJ", "War on Cancer", "well-controlled studies", #FAIL, #FAILED, about, activity, actually, acutely, adding, administered, Adverse, after, allege, alleged, alleges, allow, alone, also, and the law won ? https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/26/united-states-department-of-justice-versus-big-pharma-big-pharma-fought-the-law-and-the-law-won/", anorexia, another, antipsychotic, antipsychotics, appear, appearance, approval, approved, article, articles, associated, atypical, authors, available, average, aware, “Big Pharma”, “uncompromised by safety concerns”, based, basis, been, between, billion, Both, breath, cautioned, certain, cholesterol, Clinical, Clinical Trial, Clinical Trials, combination, combine, combined, companies, company, complain, complained, complaint, complaints, completed, concerned, concerns, conduct, conducts, confirming, congestive, consultants, continues, DATA, decompensated, dehydration, demonstrate, demonstrated, Despite, determine, difference, discontinue, distributing, doc, Doctor, doctors, downplayed, drug, due, effective, efficacious, efficacy, encourage, engaged, established, European, even, events, example, experienced, experiencing, F.D.A., FAILS, Failure, fair, FDA, findings, forced, fought, from, funded, ghostwritten, gives, GlaxoSmithKline, having, health, heart, Hospitalized, https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/27/alls-fair-in-drugs-and-war/, incidence, include, included, including, increased, indicating, indications, information, infusion, infusions, initial, involving, Janssen, Johnson & Johnson", knew, L.P.", law, long, lower, make, marketed, meant, medical, meet, message, messages, million, minimal, misleading, misleadingly, misreported, missing, must, nearly, necessity, nonetheless, notify, other, outpatient, outpatients, outside, over, overall, participants, participated, patient, patients, period, Pharma, physician, point, posed, positive, preparing, profile, promoted, promotional, publish, published, publishing, purposely, question, received, recruited, regard, regarding, reports, Response, rest, result, results", retained, risk, risks, safe, safe approved, safety, same, Scios, serial, serious, serve, severe, shortness, show, showed, significant, small, somnolence, spot, stated, stating, statistically, strokes, strong, studies, Study, subsidiaries, support, supporting, take, taking, that, these, this, time, treat, treatment, trial, ultimately, unapproved, undertaken, United States, USDOJ, use, used, uses, USFDA, versus, waited, War, were, when, which, with, withholding, won, worked, Year, Years | Leave a reply

United States Department of Justice (DOJ) versus BIG Pharma: BIG Pharma fought the law, and the law won ?

Posted on November 26, 2013 by didymusjudasthomas

Reply

——————————————————————
6/20/2003 – “Today’s plea and settlement demonstrates our strong commitment to protecting the American public from corporate greed, in whatever form that it may occur”

“THIS CASE SENDS A STRONG MESSAGE TO THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY that fraudulent activity . . . will not be tolerated and will be investigated and prosecuted to the full extent of the law.”
——————————————————————
It’s now been over 10 years

NOT SO MUCH ?
——————————————————————
INSANITY: Doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result
——————————————————————

======================================
BY DOLLAR ($) AMOUNT:
======================================

======================================
$3 BILLION ($3,000,000,000) – 2/7/2012, Monday – GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK) (4/1998 – 2007)
======================================

======================================
$2.3 BILLION ($2,300,000,000) – 9/2/2009, Wednesday – Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.
======================================

======================================
$2.2 BILLION + ($2,200,000,000) – 11/4/2013, Monday – Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and subsidiaries, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Scios Inc. (1998 – 2009)
======================================

======================================
$1.5 BILLION ($1,500,000,000) – 5/7/2012 – Abbott Laboratories (1/1998 – 12/2006)
======================================

======================================
$1.415 BILLION ($1,400,000,000) – 1/15/2009, Thursday – Eli Lilly and Company, headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana (9/1999 – end 2005)
======================================

======================================
$950 MILLION ($950,000,000)- 11/22/2011, Tuesday – Merck Sharp & Dohme
======================================

======================================
$875 MILLION ($875,000,000) – 10/2001 – TAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TAP)
======================================

======================================
$762 MILLION ($762,000,000) – .12/19/2012, Wednesday – Amgen Inc.
======================================

======================================
$650 MILLION ($650,000,000) – 2/7/2008, Thursday – Merck & Company
======================================

======================================
$520 MILLION ($520,000,000) – 4/27/2010, Tuesday – AstraZeneca LP / AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, Delaware-based company (1/2001 – 12/2006)
======================================

======================================
$490.9 MILLION ($490,900,000) – 7/30/2013, Tuesday – Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., a pharmaceutical company acquired by Pfizer, Inc. in 2009 (1998 – 2009)
======================================

======================================
$425 MILLION ($425,000,000) – 9/29/2008, Monday – Cephalon Inc., Biopharmaceutical Company
======================================

======================================
$355 MILLION ($355,000,000) – 6/20/2003, Friday – AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP – (1/1991 – 12/31/2002)
======================================

======================================
$345 MILLION ($345,000,000) – 7/30/2004, Friday – Schering Sales Corp., sales and marketing subsidiary of drug manufacturer Schering-Plough Corporation
======================================

======================================
$85 MILLION ($85,000,000) – 10/5/2011, Wednesday – Johnson & Johnson Subsidiary Scios Inc., Fremont, California-Based Company
======================================

======================================
$55 MILLION + interest ($55,000,000) – 12/12/2012, Wednesday – Wyeth LLC / Pfizer
======================================

======================================
$48.26 MILLION ($48,260,000) – 5/13/2013, Monday – C.R. Bard Inc., New Jersey based corporation
======================================

======================================
$36 MILLION ($36,000,000) – 11/21/2005, Wednesday – Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana-based company
======================================

======================================

======================================
BY DATE:
======================================

======================================
11/4/2013, Monday – $2.2 BILLION + – Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and subsidiaries, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Scios Inc. (1998 – 2009)
======================================

======================================
7/30/2013, Tuesday – $490.9 MILLION – Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., a pharmaceutical company acquired by Pfizer, Inc. in 2009 (1998 – 2009)
======================================

======================================
5/13/2013, Monday – $48.26 MILLION – C.R. Bard Inc., New Jersey based corporation
======================================

======================================
12/19/2012, Wednesday – $762 MILLION – Amgen Inc.
======================================

======================================
12/12/2012, Wednesday – $55 MILLION + interest – Wyeth LLC / Pfizer
======================================

======================================
5/7/2012 – $1.5 BILLION – Abbott Laboratories (1/1998 – 12/2006)
======================================

======================================
2/7/2012, Monday – $3 BILLION – GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK) (4/1998 – 2007)
======================================

======================================
11/22/2011, Tuesday – $950 MILLION – Merck Sharp & Dohme
======================================

======================================
10/5/2011, Wednesday – $85 MILLION – Johnson & Johnson Subsidiary Scios Inc., Fremont, California-Based Company
======================================

======================================
4/27/2010, Tuesday – $520 MILLION – AstraZeneca LP / AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, Deleware-based company (1/2001 – 12/2006)
======================================

======================================
9/2/2009, Wednesday – $2.3 BILLION – Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.
======================================

======================================
1/15/2009, Thursday – $1.415 BILLION – Eli Lilly and Company, headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana (9/1999 – end 2005)
======================================

======================================
9/29/2008, Monday – $425 MILLION ($425,000,000) – Cephalon Inc., Biopharmaceutical Company
======================================

======================================
2/7/2008, Thursday – $650 MILLION – Merck & Company
======================================

======================================
11/21/2005, Wednesday – $36 MILLION – Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana-based company
======================================

======================================
7/30/2004, Friday – $345 MILLION – Schering Sales Corp., sales and marketing subsidiary of drug manufacturer Schering-Plough Corporation
======================================

======================================
6/20/2003, Friday – $355 MILLION ($355,000,000) – AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP – (1/1991 – 12/31/2002)
======================================

======================================
10/3/2001 – $875 MILLION – TAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TAP)
======================================

======================================

======================================
ALPHABETICALLY:
======================================

======================================
Abbott Laboratories: 5/7/2012 – (1/1998 – 12/2006)
======================================
$1.5 BILLION
CIVIL LIABILITY
CRIMINAL LIABILITY
——————————————————————
$800 million – civil settlements
——————————————————————
$560,851,357 million – federal government
——————————————————————
$239,148,643 million – the States
——————————————————————
$700 million – criminal fine and forfeiture
——————————————————————
$500 million – criminal fine
——————————————————————
$198.5 million – forfeit assets
——————————————————————
$1.5 million – Virginia Medicaid Fraud Control Unit
——————————————————————
($84 million – whistleblowers will receive from federal share of settlement amount)
======================================

======================================
Amgen Inc. – 12/19/2012, Wednesday – Amerisourcebergen Corporation Subsidiary International Nephrology Network
======================================
$762 MILLION ($762,000,000) – Amgen criminal and civil liability part of global settlement with United States
——————————————————————
$612 million – Amgen agreed to pay As part of civil settlement
——————————————————————
$587.2 million – United States
——————————————————————
$24.8 million – the states
——————————————————————
$150 Million – Criminal Penalties and Forfeiture
——————————————————————
$136 million – Amgen criminal fine
——————————————————————
$14 million – Amgen criminal forfeiture
——————————————————————
$15 Million – Amerisourcebergen Corporation Subsidiary International Nephrology Network Resolve Qui Tam Action
======================================

======================================
AstraZeneca LP / AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Wilmington, Delaware-based company 4/27/2010, Tuesday – (1/2001 – 12/2006)
======================================
$520 MILLION
——————————————————————
$301,907,007 million – federal government
——————————————————————
$218,092,993 million – State Medicaid programs and District of Columbia will share up to
——————————————————————
$45 million + – James Wetta, whistleblower will receive from federal share of civil recovery
======================================

======================================
AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP – 6/20/2003, Friday – (1/1991 – 12/31/2002)
======================================
$355 MILLION
$355,000,000
CRIMINAL CHARGES
CIVIL LIABILITIES
——————————————————————
$266,127,844 million – federal civil liabilities
——————————————————————
$24,900,000 million – civil liabilities United States and the States
——————————————————————
$63,872,156 million – criminal fine
——————————————————————
($39,920,098 million – losses to federally funded insurance programs)
——————————————————————
10/2001 – $875,000,000 million – TAP Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (TAP)
civil liabilities
criminal liabilities
——————————————————————
$47.5 million – Douglas Durand was employed as Vice President of Sales for TAP Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. will receive 17% share of civil recovery
======================================

======================================
C.R. Bard Inc., New Jersey based corporation – 5/13/2013, Monday –
======================================
$48.26 million
——————————————————————
$2.2 million – non-prosecution agreement
——————————————————————
$10,134,600 – Civil settlement resolves lawsuit filed by Julie Darity, former manager for brachytherapy contracts administration under qui tam, whistleblower provisions, of False Claims Act, will receive as share of civil settlement
======================================

======================================
Cephalon Inc., Biopharmaceutical Company – 9/29/2008, Monday
======================================
$425 MILLION
($425,000,000)
——————————————————————
$375 million + interest – separate civil settlement executed contemporaneously with guilty plea agreement, to resolve False Claims Act allegations arising from claims to:
1. Medicaid
2. Medicare
3. other federal programs
including:
a. Bureau of Prisons
b. Defense Logistics Agency
c. Every Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program
d. Federal Employees Compensation Act Program
e. Federal Employees Health Benefits program
f. Postal Worker’s Compensation Program
g. Public Health Service Entities
h. TRICARE
i. Department of Veterans Affairs
——————————————————————
$116 million – State Medicaid programs will share civil settlement:
California
Delaware
Florida
Hawaii
Illinois
Louisiana
Massachusetts
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Mexico
Texas
Tennessee
Virginia
District of Columbia
——————————————————————
$50 million – In plea agreement with United States, agreed to pay to resolve Information
——————————————————————
$40 million – applied to criminal fine
——————————————————————
$10 million – applied as substitute assets to satisfy forfeiture obligation
——————————————————————
$46,469,978 MILLION – Relator Paccione will receive from federal share of settlement amount, proceeds will be shared by plaintiffs under separate agreement
======================================

======================================
Eli Lilly and Company, headquartered in Indianapolis, Indiana 1/15/2009, Thursday –
(9/1999 – end 2005)
======================================
$1.415 BILLION
CRIMINAL SETTLEMENT
CIVIL SETTLEMENT
——————————————————————
$800 million (up to) – federal government and States civil settlement agreement
——————————————————————
$438,171,544 million – federal government civil settlement
——————————————————————
$361,828,456 million (share up to) – States Medicaid programs that opt to participate in civil settlement agreement and District of Columbia
——————————————————————
$515 million – criminal fine
——————————————————————
$100 million – forfeit assets
——————————————————————
($78,870,877 million – qui tam relators from federal share of settlement amount)
——————————————————————
10/7/2008 – $62 million – 33 state consumer protection lawsuits settlements
======================================

======================================
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana-based company 11/21/2005, Wednesday
======================================
$36 million
——————————————————————
$24 million – civil liabilities
——————————————————————
$6 million – criminal fine
——————————————————————
$6 million – forfeit
======================================

======================================
GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK) 2/7/2012, Monday – (4/1998-2007)
======================================
$3 BILLION
criminal liability
civil liability
——————————————————————
$2 BILLION – federal government civil liabilities
——————————————————————
$1.043 BILLION – false claims arising from alleged conduct
——————————————————————
$832 million – federal share of settlement
——————————————————————
$210 million – States share of settlement
——————————————————————
$1 BILLION
——————————————————————
$956,814,400 million – criminal fine
——————————————————————
$43,185,600 million – forfeiture
——————————————————————
$757,387,200 million – criminal fine and forfeiture (2 drugs)
——————————————————————
$242,612,800 million – criminal fine (1 drug)
——————————————————————
$657 million – false claims arising from misrepresentations (1 drug)
——————————————————————
$508 million – federal share of settlement
——————————————————————
$149 million – States share of settlement
——————————————————————
$300 million – to resolve allegations
——————————————————————
$160,972,069 million – federal government
——————————————————————
$118,792,931 million – States
——————————————————————
$20,235,000 million – certain Public Health Service entities
======================================

======================================
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and subsidiaries, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Scios Inc. 11/4/2013, Monday – (1998 – 2009)
======================================
$2.2 BILLION +
CRIMINAL LIABILITY
CIVIL LIABILITY
——————————————————————
$1.72 billion – civil settlements with federal government and States
——————————————————————
$485 million – criminal fines and forfeiture
——————————————————————
$400 million
——————————————————————
$334 million – criminal fine
——————————————————————
$66 million – forfeiture
——————————————————————
$1.391 billion – false claims allegedly resulting from off-label marketing and kickbacks for 2 drugs includes
——————————————————————
$1.273 billion – resolution
——————————————————————
$118 million – paid to state of Texas 3/2012 to resolve similar allegations relating to 1 drug
——————————————————————
additional payment as part of settlement shared between federal and state governments
——————————————————————
$749 million – federal government recovering
——————————————————————
$524 million – the States recovering
——————————————————————
$59 million – federal government and Texas each received from Texas settlement
——————————————————————
$149 million – kickback allegations settlement
——————————————————————
$132 million – federal share of settlement
——————————————————————
$17 million – 5 participating states’ total share of settlement
——————————————————————
$98 million – 2009 – Omnicare civil liability
——————————————————————
J&J and its subsidiary, Scios Inc.
——————————————————————
$184 million – federal government civil liability
——————————————————————
$85 million – 10/2011 criminal fine
——————————————————————
From federal government’s share of civil settlements
——————————————————————
$112 million – whistleblowers in Eastern District of Pennsylvania
——————————————————————
$27.7 million – whistleblowers in District of Massachusetts
——————————————————————
$28 million – whistleblower in Northern District of California
======================================

======================================
Johnson & Johnson Subsidiary Scios Inc., Fremont, California-Based Company 10/5/2011, Wednesday
======================================
$85 million – criminal fine
======================================

======================================
Merck Sharp & Dohme 11/22/2011, Tuesday – (1999 – 2002)
======================================
$950 MILLION
CIVIL CLAIMS
CRIMINAL CHARGES
——————————————————————
$628,364,000 million – civil settlement agreement
——————————————————————
$426,389,000 million – United States civil settlement
——————————————————————
$321,636,000 million – criminal fine
——————————————————————
$201,975,000 million – Medicaid states civil settlement
======================================

======================================
Merck & Company 2/7/2008, Thursday
======================================
$650 MILLION – 2 cases
——————————————————————
$399 million + interest
——————————————————————
$250 million + interest
——————————————————————
$360 million + – federal government settlement agreement
——————————————————————
$290 million + – 49 states and District of Columbia settlement agreements
——————————————————————
$44,690,000 million – Mr. H. Dean Steinke, former Merck employee from federal share of settlement amount (1997 – 2001)
——————————————————————
$23.5 million – Mr. H. Dean Steinke, former Merck employee from the states share of settlement amount (1997 – 2001)
——————————————————————
Dr. William St. John LaCorte in New Orleans will receive share of proceeds from federal and state settlement amounts under their respective qui tam statutes
======================================

======================================
Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc. 9/2/2009, Wednesday
======================================
$2.3 BILLION
CIVIL LIABILITY
CRIMINAL LIABILITY
——————————————————————
$1.3 billion – total criminal resolution
——————————————————————
$1.195 billion – criminal fine
——————————————————————
$1 billion – civil
——————————————————————
$668,514,830 million – federal share of civil settlement
——————————————————————
$331,485,170 million – state Medicaid share of civil settlement
——————————————————————
$105 million – Pharmacia & Upjohn forfeit
——————————————————————
$102 million + – 6 whistleblowers will receive payments from federal share of civil recovery
======================================

======================================
Wyeth LLC Pfizer
======================================
12/12/2012, Wednesday
======================================
$55 MILLION + interest
======================================

======================================
Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., a pharmaceutical company acquired by Pfizer, Inc. in 2009 7/30/2013, Tuesday – (1998 – 2009)
======================================
$490.9 MILLION
CIVIL LIABILITY
CRIMINAL LIABILITY
——————————————————————
$257.4 million – civil settlements with federal government and states
——————————————————————
$233.5 million – criminal fine and forfeiture
——————————————————————
$230,112,596 million – federal government civil claims
——————————————————————
$157.58 million – criminal fine
——————————————————————
$76 million – forfeit assets
——————————————————————
$27,287,404 million – States civil claims
——————————————————————
whistleblowers’ share of civil settlement hasn’t been resolved
——————————————————————
1st action – filed by former Rapamune sales representative, Marlene Sandler, and pharmacist, Scott Paris
——————————————————————
2nd action – filed by former Rapamune sales representative, Mark Campbell
======================================

======================================
Schering Sales Corp., sales and marketing subsidiary of drug manufacturer Schering-Plough Corporation 7/30/2004, Friday
======================================
$345 MILLION
——————————————————————
$292,969,482 million – United States, 50 state Medicaid programs, certain Public Health Service entities
——————————————————————
$290 million + – Schering-Plough Corporation civil liabilities
——————————————————————
$52.5 million – Schering Sales Corp. criminal charges fine
——————————————————————
$31,662,173 million – Charles Alcorn, Beatrice Manning, and Raymond Pironti, Jr., (“the relators”) 3 former employees of ITG, Inc. a subsidiary of Schering Plough – civil resolution
======================================

======================================

======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
5/7/2012, Monday – Abbott Laboratories
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/May/12-civ-585.html
======================================
5/7/2012, Monday – Abbott Laboratories
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/abbott-labs-docs.html
======================================
10/2/2012, Tuesday – Abbott Laboratories
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/October/12-civ-1195.html
======================================
12/19/2012, Wednesday – Amgen Inc.
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/December/12-civ-1523.html
======================================
4/27/2010, Tuesday – AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2010/April/10-civ-487.html
======================================
4/27/2010, Tuesday – AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
——————————————————————

Click to access astrazeneca_settlementagreement.pdf

======================================
6/20/2003, Friday – AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2003/June/03_civ_371.html
======================================
5/13/2013, Monday – C.R. Bard Inc., New Jersey based corporation
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/May/13-civ-547.html
======================================
9/29/2008, Monday – Cephalon Inc., Biopharmaceutical Company
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2008/September/08-civ-860.html
======================================
1/15/2009, Thursday – Eli Lilly and Company
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2009/January/09-civ-038.html
======================================
12/21/2005, Wednesday – Eli Lilly and Company
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2005/December/05_civ_685.html
======================================
7/2/2012, Monday – GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK)
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/July/12-civ-842.html
======================================
11/4/2013, Monday – Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and subsidiaries
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/November/13-ag-1170.html
======================================
10/5/2011, Wednesday – Johnson & Johnson (J&J) Subsidiary Scios Inc.
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/October/11-civ-1323.html
======================================
11/22/2011, Tuesday – Merck Sharp & Dohme
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2011/November/11-civ-1524.html
======================================
2/7/2008, Thursday – Merck & Company
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2008/February/08_civ_094.html
======================================
9/2/2009, Wednesday – Pfizer Inc. and its subsidiary Pharmacia & Upjohn Company Inc.
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2009/September/09-civ-900.html
======================================
12/12/2012, Wednesday – Wyeth LLC Pfizer
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2012/December/12-civ-1488.html
======================================
7/30/2013, Tuesday – Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., a pharmaceutical company acquired by Pfizer, Inc. in 2009
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/July/13-civ-860.html
======================================
7/30/2004, Friday – Schering Sales Corp., sales and marketing subsidiary of drug manufacturer Schering-Plough Corporation
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2004/July/04_civ_523.htm
======================================
10/3/2001, Wednesday – TAP Pharmaceutical Products Inc. (TAP)
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2001/October/513civ.htm
======================================

Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog

Stanislaw Rajmund Burzynski, Stanislaw R. Burzynski, Stanislaw Burzynski, Stan R. Burzynski, Stan Burzynski, S. R. BURZYNSKI, S. Burzynski, Arthur Burzynski, Hippocrates Hypocrite Hypocrites Critic Critics Critical HipoCritical

Tag Archives: certain

Pete Cohen films Pat and Steve Clarkson

All’s fair in Drugs and War