Tag Archives: “Dr. David H. Orac Gorski Oracolyte Woo Fighter Poo Biter admits to LYING to The Guardian”

Critiquing: Stanislaw Burzynski comments on new cancer science, hilarity ensues because of The Skeptics™ comments

Posted on by
Reply

[1] – 9/9/2013 – Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski published this article

[2] – 9/10/2013 – I responded to the LIE one “Woo Fighter” made

Some of “The Skeptics™” interjected themselves, and this is “The Skeptics™” stupidity that results from them:
======================================
#45 – Old Rockin’ Dave – Hobbs End Station, on the Central Line of the Underground – September 10, 2013

“Was that #38 person claiming that Orac took a chunk out of Winnie the Pooh?”

“He seems to be a Bear of Very Little Brain indeed”
——————————————————————
No

That’s me referring to one “Woo Fighter” as being a Biter of the Poo a la poop, NOT to be confused with a Fighter of the Foo a la Foo Fighter
——————————————————————
#46 – Antaeus Feldspar – September 10, 2013

Lawrence, JKW, Khani, ORD –

“I put my brain cells in jeopardy to check out iDJiT’s blathering”
——————————————————————
After reading your comments, it’s questionable as to how many brain cells you have, that could be put “in jeopardy”

Where are you from ?

Montreal, Canada ?
——————————————————————
“Stripped of the word salad, it’s a response to Woo Fighter’s comment at 21, where he says that he (WF) notified the Guardian of iDJiT being persona non grata status just about everywhere and a paid shill for Burzynski“

“iDJiT’s contention is that he is not a paid shill for Burzynski and besides there’s also some places where his spamming hasn’t gotten him banned yet; ergo WF’s statements to the Guardian were lies“
——————————————————————
No

The points were:

[B] – I am NOT “a paid shill”

[C] – I am NOT “an employee of Burzynski”
——————————————————————
“In My Humble Analysis, the issues pretty much break down to two: his banned status, and whether he’s a paid shill for Burzynski or not”

“As regards the former, I think the doctrine of “substantial truth” probably applies, morally if not legally”
——————————————————————
What do “The Skeptics™” know about “substantial truth” when y’all are best known for LIES ?
——————————————————————
“The fact is that iDJiT’s abusive spamming has gotten him banned from multiple blogs; getting the exact number wrong doesn’t really rise to the level of “lie””
——————————————————————
Why don’t you do some Skeptic research, and determine how many comments I’ve made before I’ve been “banned” from each Skeptics blog ?

Oh, wait !

“The Skeptics™” do NOT like doing ANY research
——————————————————————
“As regards the latter, if iDJiT isn’t Burzynski’s representative, what is he doing setting up a WordPress blog under Burzynski’s name??“
——————————————————————
it’s called:

location

Location

LOCATION
——————————————————————
“We’re supposed to believe that the same Burzynski who employed the infamous Mark Stephens is looking the other way while someone who isn’t his representative operates stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com?“
——————————————————————
Who cares what you believe ?

If you’re anything like Gorski, you’re too much of a Kenny Roger’s COWARD of the County to debate whatever you may claim you “believe”
——————————————————————
“In any case, what iDJiT seems not to realize (besides how much of a freaking loony he looks) that the Guardian is very, very unlikely to ban one commenter based solely on another’s say-so”
——————————————————————
I even went to the David Grimes’ blog and posed a question, but he’s been too much of a COWARD to reply

Par for the course !
——————————————————————
“Woo Fighter may have alerted them to iDJiT’s history, but without a doubt, iDJiT’s ban was due to his own self”
——————————————————————
That’s what you would like to believe, but much of what “The Skeptics™” post is FUD
——————————————————————
#47 – Alain – September 10, 2013

“Speaking of iDJiT, did he ever had any comments on his blog?”

Alain
——————————————————————
Extraordinary grammar

Welcome to @CMPunk’s #GrammarSlam

When any of “The Skeptics™” post any comment on my blog, they find themselves getting their ass handed to them

Hence “The Skeptics™” do NOT make many comments in “The Real World”
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – 9/9/2013 – Stanislaw Burzynski comments on new cancer science, hilarity ensues
——————————————————————
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/09/09/stanislaw-burzynski-comments-on-new-cancer-science-hilarity-ensues/
======================================
[2] – 9/10/2013 – Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski “Oracolyte” Woo Fighter Poo Biter admits to LYING to “The Guardian”:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/10/dr-david-h-orac-gorski-oracolyte-woo-fighter-poo-biter-admits-to-lying-to-the-guardian/
======================================

Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski “Oracolyte” Woo Fighter Poo Biter admits to LYING to “The Guardian”

Posted on by
Reply

[1] – #21 – Woo Fighter – September 9, 2013

Guy,
it gave me great satisfaction to alert The Guardian about DJT, who I knew would be posting there once the “Myths” story hit Twitter. (He simply can’t resist posting his inane comments anywhere Stan is written about.)
——————————————————————
Why is it then that LIARS like you post numerous times before I usually point out that you are LIARS ?
——————————————————————
[2] – I told The Guardian about his back story, having being banned from all science blogs around the world, Wiki, Reddit, suspended from almost 20 Twitter accounts, etc. and that he was a paid shill and/or an employee of Burzynski.
——————————————————————
[A] – List all “science blogs around the world”

[B] – I am NOT “a paid shill”

[C] – I am NOT “an employee of Burzynski”

[D] – You just admitted to LYING to The Guardian, but do NOT worry, because you are in good company because Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski LIES too, just like Wikipedia, but Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, quickly realized that David H. Gorski, MD, PhD, FACS is NOT doing something wrong when he LIES about Burzynski
——————————————————————
Within 20 minutes his comment was scrubbed from The Guardian site which started him off on another week-long tirade about censorship and freedom of speech.
——————————————————————
Why do you NOT come post on my blog ?

Are you a COWARD like “Orac”, who posted:

[3] – .4/19/2013 – “I now think I probably know with around 95% certainty) and Didymus Judas Thomas (whose identity I’m probably about 75% sure of …

but has refused to post who he thinks I am although he’s had over 4 1/2 months to do so ?
——————————————————————
Of the over 400 comments that were posted, only two were deleted: one from DJT and one from someone else caught shilling
——————————————————————
And what # was mine, you little Biter of the Poo ?
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – 9/9/2013
======================================
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/09/09/stanislaw-burzynski-comments-on-new-cancer-science-hilarity-ensues/
======================================
[2] – 8/30/2013
——————————————————————
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/aug/30/six-stubborn-myths-cancer
======================================
[3] – 8/30/2013 – see [33]
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/08/30/dr-david-h-orac-gorski-md-phd-facs-maybe-you-should-check-your-f-a-c-t-s/
======================================