In the aftermath of the Google+ Hangout …
I remember seeing one of “The Skeptics™” continuing to twit at a pro-Burzynski Twitter user, after they were asked to stop
If I find it I’ll post it here
That I’m giving “The Skeptics™” some of their own “medicine” and they don’t like it ?
@SceptiGuy, Is it true that a “Skeptic™” sucker is born every minute ?
Because if you believe Wikipedia’s lies, “Orac” has something for sale
I’m waiting for someone to “prove it”
Guy, you have absolutely NO credibility:
2 – Terminated (Withdrawn due to slow enrollment)
7 – Withdrawn (Study withdrawn prior to enrollment)
The above 9 studies were NOT even started, which means that there would NOT be any “results” to publish
Now research the 52
Guy Chapman, you are the epitome of “massive cognitive dissonance”
After all, you thought I was “Astroturfwatch” based on absolutely nothing
Awwwwwww … and if she posts garbage as she has also done in the past, I will call her out on it
Except I never said that, and you can’t prove I said that
Maybe I should misquote you ?
David, this is the first question for Bob:
3/4/2013 – 7:58pm – You posted on Colorado Public Television (CPT12):
“ANP is toxic as anything!”
So you’re saying what ?
ANP is as toxic as water ?
David, do you understand that question, or is it too difficult for you ?
@StortSkeptic, I’ve tried to make it as easy as possible for “The Skeptics™” to leave comments on my blog without having to authenticate/sign in
Why don’t you grow some “grapefruits” and ask away ?
Why can’t you think the way you twit ?
David, where’s your citation(s), reference(s), and / or link(s) that support your position as to when you think Burzynski was required to publish ?
I thoroughly enjoyed the rest while Bob yapped away about things he’s blogged about already, and I’ve already blogged about
Yeah … waiting for those citations, references, and / or links
Actions speak louder than words 🙂
Bobby Blaskiewicz Bows Up ‘Bout Burzynski: