Critiquing the Critics at Sciencebasedmedicine (Burzynski: Cancer Is A Serious Business, Part 2:)

Like the first Burzynski movie, only more so?
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/burzynski-cancer-is-a-serious-business-part-2-like-the-first-burzynski-movie-only-more-so

“Elburto

Merola is subhuman filth

We’re accused of bullying cancer patients online for daring to say

“there’s no evidence”,

yet he can effectively say

“Those parents killed their children

They weren’t Burzynskiite Twoo Believers, and look at the result” on film, without feeling remotely troubled about it

and how it was abused by Stan the Conman*

For Merola to stoop so low as to place the death of these tiny children on the heads of their parents, is something I cannot understand

It makes me with I believed in god and hell

It’s just unfathomable that someone could be so base and callous about dead children

But no, we’re the evil ones

*Almost as bad as this is Stan’s new spin doctor’s claim that the fundraising families have lied about the costs of “treatment” in order to fleece the public”

After reading the above comments that were Eblurto’d out:

“It makes me with”

I had NOT read it

Maybe ElBlurto should have read THIS:

“Vasha

A lot of the Burzynski publicists’ favorite cases seem to have been cancers where the chances weren’t good right from the beginning — diffuse pontine glioma, glioblastoma multiforme, etc

This allows them to paint doctors as cold for not promising much hope

It’s the old

“Doctors sent me home to die!” meme

Patients who want to be given hope, above all hope, sometimes interpret bad news as deliberate cruelty”

You mean all of Burzynski’s success were because of Doctors misdiagnoses; since they should have told the patient to go home and “Heal Thyself” through “Spontaneous Regression” ?

Immunity over inability:

The spontaneous regression of cancer
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3312698
J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2011 Jan-Jun; 2(1): 43–49.
doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.82318
PMCID: PMC3312698

“Guy Chapman

How could you be so heartless, Dr Gorski?

Eric Merola almost bankrupted himself to bring us this compelling tale of the brave maverick doctor whose success in promoting a non-toxic cure for cancer has been ruined by evil skeptics in the pay of Big Pharma!

Surely that outweighs all the suffering and crippling financial burden imposed on patients?

Surely we must give Burzynski a free pass form all criticism of his unethical and frankly incompetently conducted trials, in recognition of the selfless sacrifice of a man who might not make any money out of his latest long-form advertisement?”

You mean the man a “Skeptic Mule” questioned about funding because he used a tactic familiar to a lot of critics, the “I can’t be bothered to research” tactic:
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/03/14/five-things-i-learned-second-hand-from-the-recent-screening-of-burzynski-cancer-is-serious-business-part-2

“I can take satisfaction that when Brian got up to ask a question, identified himself as a Skeptic

(a “skeptic mule,” to be precise),

and, prefacing his question with the observation that Merola accused all of us of being funded by pharma,

asked him about how he has funded his movies,

Merola reportedly looked none too pleased. It was at this point that I think we get a full lesson in where Merola’s at”
http://www.randi.org/site/index.php/swift-blog/2050-qburzynski-iiq-is-more-of-the-same.html

“Xplodyncow

Ah, I get it now

The Skeptics™ are the cranky old person at the end of the street, the one who screams,

“Get off my lawn, damn kids!” at passersby, launching into meandering screeds when provoked

“In my day, we didn’t have any of this ‘antineoplaston’ tomfoolery

No, when you got cancer, you suffered until you died!

It was character building.””

Or THIS:
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/24/the-skeptics

“The Skeptics” (Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business, Part II)

The “group” “The Sketics” claims is NOT a “group” and which allegedly does NOT spread “misinformation”

Why do some Burzynski critics claim they are NOT a “group” when they use the same blog Title ?

2/12/2013 – Josephine Jones @_JosephineJones
Burzynski: in dire need of credibility
http://josephinejones.wordpress.com
2/13/2013 – 21stFloor @The21stFloor – Keir Liddle @endless_psych (Riddle Like)
Burzynski: In dire need of credibility

http://www.thetwentyfirstfloor.com
2/7/2013 – Josephine Jones @_JosephineJones
Burzynski: harming without care?
http://josephinejones.wordpress.com
2/13/2013 – 21stFloor @The21stFloor – Keir Liddle @endless_psych (Riddle Like)
Burzynski: Harming without care?

http://www.thetwentyfirstfloor.coem
Why do some Burzynski critics claim they are NOT a “group” when they refer to each other’s blog ?

1/6/2013 – PZ Myers
Let’s make Houston cancer quack Burzynski pay!
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/01/06/lets-make-houston-cancer-quack-burzynski-pay

“We’re coming up on Burzynski’s 70th birthday”

Citing and linking to 1/4/2013 blog

1/7/2013 – Orac @oracknows David Gorski @gorskon (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine
Let’s make Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski do something good for cancer patients for a change
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/01/07/lets-make-dr-stanislaw-burzynski-do-something-good-for-cancer-patients-for-a-change

“That’s why I like the idea of the campaign that Bob Baskiewicz has come up with to wish Dr. Burzynski a happy birthday this year, skeptic style:”

Citing and linking to 1/4/2013 blog:

1/4/2013 – Bob Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz
Happy Birthday, Dr. Burzynski!
http://thehoustoncancerquack.com/2013/01/04/happy-birthday-dr-burzynski

Why do some Burzynski critics claim they are NOT a “group” when they twit on twitter they congratulate each other re blogs and such ?

1/28/2013 – David Gorski @gorskon Orac @oracknows (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine

Re C0nc0rdance
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/23/my-review-of-c0nc0rdance

3/4/2013 – 21stFloor @The21stFloorr – Keir Liddle @endless_psych (Riddle Like)
http://tmblr.co/ZXehnvfULh9y
Re David Gorski @gorskon Orac @oracknows (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine

3/5/2013 – 21stFloor @The21stFloor – Keir Liddle @endless_psych (Riddle Like)
http://tmblr.co/ZXehnvfcJhax
Re Josephine Jones @_JosephineJones

3/15/2013 – Bob Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz

retweeted David Gorski @gorskon Orac @oracknows (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine

3/22/2013 – Josephine Jones @_JosephineJones retweeted:
http://p.ost.im/p/dxSYBC
Guy Chapman @SceptiGuy

3/22/2013 – Josephine Jones @_JosephineJones retweeted:
http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/index.html
Bob Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz

Why do some Burzynski critics claim they are NOT a “group” when they comment on each others blogs ?

Post #2 – rjblaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz (Bob Blaskiewicz) – Wisconsin – 1/7/2013
Thanks, PZ

Post#8 – Orac @oracknows David Gorski @gorskon (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine – 1/8/2013
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/01/06/lets-make-houston-cancer-quack-burzynski-pay
Let’s make Houston cancer quack Burzynski pay!
Posted by
PZ Myers 1/6/2013

“Read the latest on Burzynski from
Science-Based Medicine” (David Gorski @gorskon Orac @oracknows David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine

Now that Burzynski has gotten off in 2012, Burzynski The Movie will spawn a sequel in 2013
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/burzynski-movie-spawns-a-sequel
David Gorski @gorskon Orac @oracknows (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine – 12/3/2012

Post #2 – Robert Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz (Bob Blaskiewicz) – 1/7/2013

“The Skeptics” non- group activity on Forbes:

Forbes Learns a Lesson, but Not the Right One: Censorship and Bias re: A Film Producer, A Cancer Doctor, And Their Critics
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/05/forbes-learns-a-lesson-but-not-the-right-one-censorship-and-bias-re-a-film-producer-a-cancer-doctor-and-their-critics/