“The Skeptics” (Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business, Part II)

The “group” “The Sketics” claims is NOT a “group” and which allegedly does NOT spread “misinformation”

Why do some Burzynski critics claim they are NOT a “group” when they use the same blog Title ?

2/12/2013 – Josephine Jones @_JosephineJones
Burzynski: in dire need of credibility
http://josephinejones.wordpress.com
2/13/2013 – 21stFloor @The21stFloor – Keir Liddle @endless_psych (Riddle Like)
Burzynski: In dire need of credibility

http://www.thetwentyfirstfloor.com
2/7/2013 – Josephine Jones @_JosephineJones
Burzynski: harming without care?
http://josephinejones.wordpress.com
2/13/2013 – 21stFloor @The21stFloor – Keir Liddle @endless_psych (Riddle Like)
Burzynski: Harming without care?

http://www.thetwentyfirstfloor.coem
Why do some Burzynski critics claim they are NOT a “group” when they refer to each other’s blog ?

1/6/2013 – PZ Myers
Let’s make Houston cancer quack Burzynski pay!
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/01/06/lets-make-houston-cancer-quack-burzynski-pay

“We’re coming up on Burzynski’s 70th birthday”

Citing and linking to 1/4/2013 blog

1/7/2013 – Orac @oracknows David Gorski @gorskon (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine
Let’s make Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski do something good for cancer patients for a change
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2013/01/07/lets-make-dr-stanislaw-burzynski-do-something-good-for-cancer-patients-for-a-change

“That’s why I like the idea of the campaign that Bob Baskiewicz has come up with to wish Dr. Burzynski a happy birthday this year, skeptic style:”

Citing and linking to 1/4/2013 blog:

1/4/2013 – Bob Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz
Happy Birthday, Dr. Burzynski!
http://thehoustoncancerquack.com/2013/01/04/happy-birthday-dr-burzynski

Why do some Burzynski critics claim they are NOT a “group” when they twit on twitter they congratulate each other re blogs and such ?

1/28/2013 – David Gorski @gorskon Orac @oracknows (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine

Re C0nc0rdance
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/03/23/my-review-of-c0nc0rdance

3/4/2013 – 21stFloor @The21stFloorr – Keir Liddle @endless_psych (Riddle Like)
http://tmblr.co/ZXehnvfULh9y
Re David Gorski @gorskon Orac @oracknows (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine

3/5/2013 – 21stFloor @The21stFloor – Keir Liddle @endless_psych (Riddle Like)
http://tmblr.co/ZXehnvfcJhax
Re Josephine Jones @_JosephineJones

3/15/2013 – Bob Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz

retweeted David Gorski @gorskon Orac @oracknows (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine

3/22/2013 – Josephine Jones @_JosephineJones retweeted:
http://p.ost.im/p/dxSYBC
Guy Chapman @SceptiGuy

3/22/2013 – Josephine Jones @_JosephineJones retweeted:
http://www.pbs.org/ombudsman/index.html
Bob Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz

Why do some Burzynski critics claim they are NOT a “group” when they comment on each others blogs ?

Post #2 – rjblaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz (Bob Blaskiewicz) – Wisconsin – 1/7/2013
Thanks, PZ

Post#8 – Orac @oracknows David Gorski @gorskon (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine – 1/8/2013
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2013/01/06/lets-make-houston-cancer-quack-burzynski-pay
Let’s make Houston cancer quack Burzynski pay!
Posted by
PZ Myers 1/6/2013

“Read the latest on Burzynski from
Science-Based Medicine” (David Gorski @gorskon Orac @oracknows David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine

Now that Burzynski has gotten off in 2012, Burzynski The Movie will spawn a sequel in 2013
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/burzynski-movie-spawns-a-sequel
David Gorski @gorskon Orac @oracknows (David H. Gorski) #sciencebasedmedicine – 12/3/2012

Post #2 – Robert Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz (Bob Blaskiewicz) – 1/7/2013

“The Skeptics” non- group activity on Forbes:

Forbes Learns a Lesson, but Not the Right One: Censorship and Bias re: A Film Producer, A Cancer Doctor, And Their Critics
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/05/05/forbes-learns-a-lesson-but-not-the-right-one-censorship-and-bias-re-a-film-producer-a-cancer-doctor-and-their-critics/

Advertisements

My review of C0nc0rdance

Orac (David H. Gorski) blogged:

(although we do have C0nc0rdance)
http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/index.php/three-myths-about-stanislaw-burzynski-and-the-skeptics

as if C0nc0rdance is a reliable source

1/24/2013 – C0nc0rdance posted a video on YouTube

The Burzynski Clinic

“Feel free to pass this on to anyone considering their options in alternative cancer treatments at the Burzynski Clinic

It’s also CCMA, so feel free to mirror or repost

AUTHOR’S NOTE:

I caught an error in post-production:

The Burzynski Clinic has only started 61 clinical trials, not 62

The last came up in my query because one of the authors has the same name

Otherwise the figures are correct”

“Fact 1:

The Burzynski Clinic has attempted 61 clinical trials, but only completed 1

Check it out here:”
http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=Burzynski&Search=Search

“Fact 2:

The Burzynski Clinic charges
its patients to participate in a study of their patented medication that exposes them to risk”

http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/05/05/harnessing-peoples-good-to-pay-for-woo

“Fact 3:

The Burzynski Clinic makes heavy use of marketing techniques not normally associated with clinical practices and not in the best spirit of research medicine

For example, you can see here that they are abusing libel laws to silence critics”
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2011/nov/30/burzynski-clinic-cancer-libel-laws

And threatening and bullying of a 17 year old blogger by a media consultant:”
http://rhysmorgan.co/burzynski-morally-reprehensible

1:10-I want to present the case of Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski in my home state of Texas

1:30-cancer researcher

Maybe you should consider sticking to cancer research

1:32_3 red flags

Hearing this raised a “red flag” that your claims might be suspect

1:57_3 undisputed facts

And this proved it

2:00-Fact 1 clinical trials

The “FACT” one should know is that clinicaltrials . gov does NOT contain the same data as the National Cancer Institute (NCI) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) cancer . gov web-site:

61 TOTAL
1 – Not Yet Recruiting (Open)(Phase 3)
1 – Closed
2 – Terminated (Withdrawn due to slow enrollment)
7 – Withdrawn (This study has been withdrawn prior to enrollment)
10 – Recruiting (Open)
11 – Open (1 Not Yet Recruiting / 10 Recruiting)
40 – Active, not recruiting (Closed)
http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/search/results?protocolsearchid=11475951

http://cancer.gov/clinicaltrials/search/results?protocolsearchid=11476036

On clinicaltrials . gov, if you select one of the “Unknowns,” it displays:

“Verified ____, ____ by National Cancer Institute (NCI)”

“Information provided by:
National Cancer Institute (NCI)”

“Further study details as provided by National Cancer Institute (NCI):”

Contact: Stanislaw R. Burzynski, MD, PhD

Investigators
Study Chair: Stanislaw R. Burzynski, MD, PhD

2:33-Every clinical trial has to register before starting

FALSE: I contacted the National Cancer Institute (NCI) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and was advised:

Not every cancer clinical trial taking place in the United States is listed on our NCI clinical trials database

The investigators must apply and follow guidelines to be included

4:08-Fact 2 – The Burzynski Clinic charges patients to receive clinical trial medications

FALSE: Burzynski does NOT charge for antineoplastons

By comparison:

St. Jude:
http://www.stjude.org/stjude/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=403c6f9523e70110VgnVCM1000001e0215acRCRD

2/15/2012 – the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has awarded St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital $4,314,800 for a childhood cancer survivor study

The new federal funds will be distributed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI)
http://cohen.house.gov/press-release/cohen-st-jude-receive-43-million-childhood-cancer-survivor-study

Tax-Exempt
Receives Federal Grants / Funds
http://www.stjude.org/stjude/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=b7e79bb8a0cf5110VgnVCM1000001e0215acRCRD&cpsextcurrchannel=1

Donations to St. Jude are tax deductible as allowed by law
http://www.stjude.org/stjude/v/index.jsp?vgnextoid=6f8afa3186e70110VgnVCM1000001e0215acRCRD&vgnextchannel=2f62940504f9a210VgnVCM1000001e0215acRCRD

FORBES: CEO – $742,718
http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml

Burzynski does NOT receive Federal Grants / Funds, is NOT Tax-Exempt, and you can NOT write off a contribution as a tax deduction on your Tax Return

6:32-Burzynski movie
doesn’t examine the issue from both sides

FACT: None of the oncologists who originally diagnosed each patient presented in this film would agree to go on-camera, or submit a written statement
1:44:44 – 1:44:52
(http://www.burzynskimovie.com)

6:41-Conspiracy

FACT: See these 2 links:
http://burzynskimovie.com/images/stories/transcript/Documents/BurzynskiTriesToExposeNCI.pdf

http://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wiki-site.com/index.php/Main_Page

Fact 3: it is referred to as “Beating a Dead Horse” when a point that is moot, is be labored by critics