“The Amazing Meeting” (I don’t think it means, what you think it says it means): 2 Intellectually and Ethically Challenged Individuals, Twaddle at TAM 2013

Gentlemen, I start your Insolence 😇
——————————————————————
(1:30) [1]
——————————————————————
The “motto” of “The Amazing (Not so Much) Meeting” is “Fighting Fakers,” which is apropos, since I doubt that “Orac” the “Check my Facts” Hack of Dr. David H. Gorski, grasps the irony, that when I read some of his blog articles, you could easily switch his name with the name of some individual he is flogging, and the proverbial shoe fits, and:
——————————————————————
(1:40)
——————————————————————
“This is a guy who sometimes fools even, you know, physicians”
——————————————————————
(I couldn’t have said it better, myself) 😊
——————————————————————
(2:47)
——————————————————————
He states:

“There is a long segment about “The Skeptics”

(applause) 😝
——————————————————————
(4:25)
——————————————————————
“His lawyer wrote a book”

“About a half of it is about Burzynski [4]
——————————————————————
6:00
——————————————————————
Gorski mentions that Burzynski noticed that there were higher levels of these chemicals in healthy people, than people with cancer
——————————————————————
Whereas, Burzynski is on record as having said [5]:

” . . . healthy people have abundance of these chemicals in blood
Cancer patients have varied to none

I did NOT know before now, that GorskGeek thinks that “none” is a “level” 😶
——————————————————————
He continues:

AS2.1 – which is a chemical called phenylacetic acid, which is a byproduct of metabolism that turns into phenylacetylglutamine by the liver

A10 – soluble is basically the same thing
It breaks down to PAG
——————————————————————
WOW !

I thought it was: AS2 1 😊

They are “basically the same thing” ? 😳

What does Burzynski say ? [6]

Phenylacetylglutaminate (PG) and Phenylacetate (PN) are metabolites of Phenylbutyrate (PB) and are constituents of antineoplaston AS2-1

PG and PN are naturally occurring in human body as result of metabolism of phenylalanine in liver and kidneys

formulation of antineoplaston AS2-1 is 4:1 mixture of synthetic PN and PG

A10 is 4:1 mixture of PG and iso-PG

That does NOT look like “basically the same thing” to me 😛

20131111-160455.jpg
——————————————————————
(6:50)
——————————————————————
Gorski founders on:

“And these are substances which were actually studied in the ’50’s and ’60’s and not found to be particularly, um, promising, but, he didn’t know that then”
——————————————————————
GorskGeek has #FAILED miserably to prove that on his blogs [7] 😄
——————————————————————
(8:00)
——————————————————————
Gorski comments about Burzynski’s “animal testing,” “species specific” claims:

“There are ways of getting around that”
——————————————————————
But Gorski, again, has #FAILED miserably to prove it [8] 😅
——————————————————————
(12:00)
——————————————————————
Gorski makes lame excuses about the NCI phase II clinical trial [9] 😖
——————————————————————
(12:50)
——————————————————————
Gorski claims Burzynski was indicted for insurance fraud in the 1997 case 😱
——————————————————————
GorskGeek, care to try and prove that one also ? [10] 😃
——————————————————————
(14:25)
——————————————————————
Gorski then states that out of 61 trials on clinicaltrials . gov, “most” are “closed or unknown”
——————————————————————
GorskGeek #FAILED again 😁

At the time it was:

1 – Not Yet Recruiting
(OPEN)(Phase 3)
1 – COMPLETED
2 – WITHDRAWN
(Withdrawn due to slow enrollment)
7 – WITHDRAWN
(This study has been withdrawn prior to enrollment)
(9=WITHDRAWN)
10 – Recruiting
(10=OPEN)
40 – Active, not recruiting –
(40=CLOSED)
61 =TOTAL
——————————————————————
(15:20)
——————————————————————
Gorski attempts to go all “legal eagle”:

“Listen to Burzynski’s lawyer!”

“You listen to Burzynski’s lawyer; and, and I swear I don’t understand, like why Burzynski would let him, let his lawyer say stuff this damning in his own book, but he does”

“So, get a load of some of these quotes, referring to one of the clinical trials, he says:”

“It was a joke”

“. . . there could not be any possibility of meaningful data coming out of the so-called clinical trial, it was all an artifice, that, you know, designed so that they could continue giving the treatment

“The FDA wanted all of his patients to be on an IND, so, that’s what we did”
——————————————————————
Gorski, attorney Rick Jaffe is an American, living in America NOT the formerly communist Poland

He can say whatever he wants

GorskGeek is NOT a lawyer 😓

And there’s an excellent reason why

Nor is he schooled in the proper usage of the English language

FACT:

” . . . the so-called clinical trial . . .”

Any human being with a modicum of intelligence about the English language, understands that the term “clinical trial” is singular, i.e. one

Burzynski’s lawyer is obviously referring to the CAN-1 clinical trial mentioned in Burzynski’s 11/25/1997 Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing [11]

One trial that is retrospective is CAN-1 Clinical Trial
——————————————————————
CAN-1 PHASE II STUDY OF ANTINEOPLASTONS A10 AND AS2-1 IN

PATIENTS WITH REFRACTORY MALIGNANCIES

133 patients
——————————————————————
Clinical trial of patients treated by Dr. Burzynski through 2/23/1996

FDA has indicated it will not accept data generated by this trial since it was not a wholly prospective one
——————————————————————
Gorski continues his trend of #FAILURES when he mentions the additional types of treatments that Burzynski was offering, but he #FAILED to mention [12] 😂
——————————————————————
” … in 1997, his medical practice was expanded to include traditional cancer treatment options such as chemotherapy, gene targeted therapy, immunotherapy and hormonal therapy in response to FDA requirements that cancer patients utilize more traditional cancer treatment options in order to be eligible to participate in the Company’s Antineoplaston clinical trials”
——————————————————————
(18:20)
——————————————————————
Gorski addresses the case of Tori Moreno
——————————————————————
Kim Moreno states:

“We originally were at Miller’s Children at Long Beach Memorial and then went to City of Hope

“We also sent her MRI’s to Dr. Fred Epstein in New York to be looked at”

Gorski suggests that 3 different opinions could have misdiagnosed Tori Moreno

You can read an interview with Tori’s mother [13]
——————————————————————
(19:45)
——————————————————————
Gorski goes on to mention Burzynski patients going to Texas Children’s Hospital with hypernatremia issues
——————————————————————
Gorski, do you mean this ? [14]

The changing pattern of hypernatremia in hospitalized children

Department of Pediatrics, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
——————————————————————
(20:00)
——————————————————————
Gorski mangles the case of Hannah Bradley, who had a grade 3 anaplastic astrocytoma brain tumor

GorskGeek makes excuses like “spontaneous remission”, but then provides no citation, reference, or link to a case of such a tumor having spontaneously exhibited remission [15]
——————————————————————
(20:40)
——————————————————————
Gorski states that antineoplastons are chemotherapy
——————————————————————
No, Gorski, antineoplaston are:

“…an unapproved drug, not ordinary “chemotherapy [16] 😣
——————————————————————
(21:53)
——————————————————————
Gorski claims in regard to Burzynski’s personalized gene-targeted therapy:

” . . . gives to the patient without regard for synergistic toxicity

“Boom, there you go”
——————————————————————
Gorski’s #FAIL rate continues, as Burzynski has stated that phase 2 and 3 publications are reviewed as part of this process [17]

Gorski, “BOOM, THERE YOU GO”
——————————————————————
Gorski, you should hire out to the Democratic Party as their mascot, because you must be the biggest pompous ASS I’ve ever seen 😜

Gorski, my advice: don’t quit your day job, HACK 😷
——————————————————————
The #TAM2013 audience then has to suffer through 22:36 of the blatherskite of Robert J. (don’t call me Bobby) “Bob” Blaskiewicz Blatherskitewicz [2]

He blathers about the “dozen,” “17,” “16 dead,” “pancreatic cancer,” “Joseph, who was alive but died well within the life expectancy given his diagnosis,” “Joann, who was alive but died within a year of starting therapy,” “Irene S., who was dead within month,” “Maxine, who was already dead,” the “103 in 2011,” “63 in mid-June,” “17 on original 1999 site,” “about 3 added a year,” the “about 50 stories,” “1/10th of patient names gathered,” “Amelia S. – 7, tumor breaking up,” “Chase,” “Cody – 1994, 20 years ago, 2 visits, 6 weeks treatment breaking up,” “David,” “Janet, 3 – 5 yrs., oncologist, now dead, ovarian cancer,” “Pete took video down,” “8,000 patients,” “probable ischemic necrosis,” “13 yr. old, getting worse getting better, vomited – Marlene, nurse,” “Rory died 2005,” “Supatra, swelling, last wed., brain tumor,” “Side-effect, 2%, sodium load,” “Andrea, U.S. News and World Report, 30% chance recovery, glioblastoma, ANP in luggage, died on plane,” “Cathy wanted to be on ANP, Greg Burzynski, found out only brain tumor,” “Denise D. breast cancer,” and finally:
——————————————————————
(18:45)
——————————————————————
” … and light as many fires under his butt as we can
——————————————————————
Mentions Rick Jaffe’s book Galileo’s Lawyer

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE PATIENTS [4]
——————————————————————
All you need to know about Blaskiewicz is:

“White man speak with forked tongue” [18]
——————————————————————
The 3rd video is a panel discussion, which includes “man-crush” tag-team [3]

Robert Blaskiewicz and David Gorski
——————————————————————
(8:00)
——————————————————————
Bob says:

“Yeah, I’m not that type of doctor
——————————————————————
Bob, the correct answer for you, is:

“I’m NOT a doctor” QUACK
——————————————————————
(13:05)
——————————————————————
Gorski gabs that he’s a:

“Game of Thrones Geek”
——————————————————————
I just knew I was right, GorskGeek [19]
——————————————————————
(14:00)
——————————————————————
The only female panelist mentions “bureaucrats”, “wimps”, and “people without balls”
——————————————————————
2 out of 3 ain’t bad

She describes the Bob and David show to a T
——————————————————————
(15:00)
——————————————————————
The claim is made that a Burzynski physician appeared on the Burzynski Facebook page announcing results
——————————————————————
(16:00)
——————————————————————
Gorski #whines that the Texas Medical Board wasn’t successful in shutting Burzynski down because of “politics”
——————————————————————
LAUGHABLE
——————————————————————
(20:55)
——————————————————————
Gorski gives his usual excuse:

“He’s not an oncologist”
——————————————————————
GorskiGeek, that claim is as dead as apparently, quite a number of your brain cells [15]
——————————————————————
(34:40)
——————————————————————
Audience members are given the opportunity to speak, and this is the garbage served up:
——————————————————————
“Hi, this is Susan

Ah, don’t forget to mention that Wikipedia has been a major battlefield

We’ve had 23,000 views to the clinic’s page this last month, also rebutr . . .”
——————————————————————
“Control the flow of information”
——————————————————————
Gorski pipes up:

“What she said”
——————————————————————
(35:20)
——————————————————————
Blatherskitewicz chimes in:

“When it comes to Wikipedia can I just mention that is, that is, that that is so effective that Wikipedia was singled out in the most recent Burzynski movie
——————————————————————
Gorski chirps:

“Yes”
——————————————————————
Bob yacks:

“as being controlled by evil skeptics
——————————————————————
Gorski ejaculates:

“No, seriously”
——————————————————————
Bob bleats:

“No”

(applause)
——————————————————————
“You have to unleash the evil hoards of skeptics

“Wahahaha” 👿
——————————————————————
Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski on Wikipedia:

“Simply don’t pay attention to it, because it, it’s not true”

“You won’t be able to, do any, clinical research which we do, without convincing evidence, especially when you have the most powerful agency in the government which is against you

“So they would love to find something which is wrong with what we are doing”

“Ah, so the fact that they’ve, um, agreed that what we have has value, and they allow us to do phase 3 clinical trials it means that we are right”

“Because, uh, uh, nobody who didn’t have any, concrete evidence that it works, would be able to go as far”

“So whatever Wikipedia says, well, I don’t care for them

(laughing) [5]
——————————————————————
Enlightening ?

Inspiring ?

Amazing ?

Hypocrites

Apparatchiks [20]
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1]David Gorski – Why We Fight (Part I): Stanislaw Burzynski Versus Science-Based Medicine – TAM 2013 11/8/2013 (22:44)
——————————————————————

======================================
[2]Robert Blaskiewicz – Why We Fight (Part II): It’s All About The Patients – TAM 2013 11/8/2013 (22:36)
——————————————————————

======================================
[3] – Medical Cranks And Quacks
TAM 2013 JREF
11/8/2013 (42:42)
——————————————————————

======================================
[4]“Galileo’s Lawyer” Richard A. Jaffe, Esq.
——————————————————————
http://www.richardjaffe.com
======================================
[5] – 11/9/2013 – Pete Cohen chats with Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/09/pete-cohen-chats-with-dr-stanislaw-burzynski/
======================================
[6] – 6/2012 – Journal of Cancer Therapy, 2012, 3, 192-200 doi:10.4236/jct.2012.33028 Published Online June 2012, Pg. 192
——————————————————————
http://www.burzynskiclinic.com/images/stories/Publications/9219.pdf
======================================
[7]Burzynski: Oh, RATS!!!:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/07/26/the-lancet-oncology-peer-review-team-d-12-01519-fail-2/
======================================
[8] – Critiquing: How Stanislaw Burzynski became Burzynski the Brave Maverick Doctor, part 1:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/07/22/critiquing-how-stanislaw-burzynski-became-burzynski-the-brave-maverick-doctor-part-1/
======================================
[9] – 9/19/2013 – Critiquing: National Cancer Institute (NCI) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) CancerNet “fact sheet”:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/19/critiquing-national-cancer-institute-nci-at-the-national-institutes-of-health-nih-cancernet/
======================================
[10] – 9/25/2013 – Critiquing: National Council Against Health Fraud, Inc. – NCAHF News: JURY NULLIFICATION THWARTS BURZYNSKI CONVICTION:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/25/critiquing-national-council-against-health-fraud-inc-ncahf-news-jury-nullification-thwarts-burzynski-conviction/
======================================
[11] – 7/9/2013 – Burzynski: The Original 72 Phase II Clinical Trials:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/burzynski-the-original-72-phase-ii-clinical-trials/
======================================
[12] – 4/26/2013 – Burzynski: FDA requirements that cancer patients utilize more traditional cancer treatment options in order to be eligible to participate in the Company’s Antineoplaston CLINICAL TRIALS:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/burzynski-fda-requirements-that-cancer-patients-utilize-more-traditional-cancer-treatment-options-in-order-to-be-eligible-to-participate-in-the-companys-antineoplaston-clinical-trials/
======================================
[13] – Tori Moreno
——————————————————————
http://www.cancerinform.org/aburzinterview2.html
======================================
[14] – 9/1999 – Pediatrics. 1999 Sep;104(3 Pt 1):435-9
——————————————————————
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/10469766/
======================================
[15] – 11/2/2013 – Critiquing: Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski’s cancer “success” stories:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/02/critiquing-dr-stanislaw-burzynskis-cancer-success-stories/
——————————————————————
10/25/2013 – Hannah Bradley – I Feel Empowered, In Control Of My Body: Four Women On Fighting Cancer With Alternative Therapies http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10383724/I-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies.html
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/25/hannah-bradley-i-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies-httpwww-telegraph-co-ukhealth10383724i-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-fo/
======================================
[16] – NOT ORDINARY CHEMOTHERAPY
——————————————————————
https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/27/27.F3d.153.93-2071.html
======================================
[17] – 9/4/2013 – University of Michigan, where is alum Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski’s Grapefruits ?:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/04/university-of-michigan-where-is-alum-dr-david-h-orac-gorskis-grapefruits/
======================================
[18] – 10/13/2013 – Why “The Skeptics™” Perfessor Robert J. (don’t call me “Bobby”) “Bob” Blaskiewicz (@rjblaskiewicz) of University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire, “Fame,” is a Coward and a Liar:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/13/why-the-skeptics-perfessor-robert-j-dont-call-me-bobby-bob-blaskiewicz-rjblaskiewicz-of-university-of-wisconsin-eau-claire-fame-is-a-coward-and-a-liar/
======================================
[19] – 10/27/2013 – “The Skeptics™” Burzynski Bias, Censorship, Lies, and Alibi’s: September 28, 2013 “The Skeptics™” Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/27/the-skeptics-lie-lied-lies-liars-lying-burzynski-bias-censorship-lies-and-alibis-september-28-2013-the-skeptics-burzynski-discussion-by-bob-blaskiewic/
======================================
[20] – 11/9/2013 – Wikipedia Articles:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/burzynski-timeline/
======================================

Burzynski: Texas Medical Board (TMB) and State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH)

TMB / SOAH
http://www.casewatch.org/board/med/burzynski/complaint_2010.shtml
12/8/2010
2/9/2012
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=openfolder&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%FOLDERID=2377%tonew=Yes

Texas Medical Board
Board Orders
STANISLAW RAJMUND BURZYNSKI, MD
10 Documents Found
View Date License Number
10/14/1994 D9377
2/22/1995 D9377
2/7/1996 D9377
6/6/2003 D9377
SOAH
View Date Docket # License #
9/6/1988 0 D9377
7/12/1990 0 D9377
8/14/1992 0 D9377
8/31/1994 0 D9377
12/8/2010 503-11-1669.MD D9377
2/9/2012 503-11-1669.MD D9377
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/BoardOrders/ViewBoardOrders.aspx?ID_NUM=49851
State Office of Administrative Hearings
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb
Guest Account:
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=login&WCE=frmlogin&WCU=
12/8/2012 – Texas Medical Board Dismisses Case Against Cancer Doctor Burzynski
http://www.bolenreport.com/feature_articles/soahdismissalorder.pdf

http://www.healthimpactnews.com/2012/texas-medical-board-dismisses-case-against-cancer-doctor-burzynsk
12/6/2012 – Texas Medical Board Dismisses Case Against Cancer Doctor Burzynski:
This suit was eventually withdrawn in 11/2012
http://healthimpactnews.com/2012/texas-medical-board-dismisses-case-against-cancer-doctor-burzynski
12/8/2010 – 11/19/2012 .503-11-1669
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=tokwebmain&WCE=queryform&WCU=
11/20/2012
http://curezone.org/forums/fm.asp?i=2008363
62 Documents
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=openfolder&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%FOLDERID=2377%tonew=Yes
63. 11/19/2012 ORDER # 17 – GRANTING STAFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=157936%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
62. 11/16/2012 RESPONDENT’S JOINDER TO BOARD STAFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=157540%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
61. 11/16/2012 BOARD STAFF’S MOTION TO DISMISS – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=157484%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
60. 10/30/2012 ORDER # 16 – GRANTING # DENYING IN PART STAFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER # 12 – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=154479%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
59. 5/23/2012 ORDER # 15 – SETTING HEARING ON STAFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=136010%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
58. 5/22/2012 SUBMISSION OF DATES – J. HEISLER
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=124333%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
57. 5/16/2012 ORDER # 14 – REGARDING STAFF’S OBJECTION TO ORDER # 12 – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=123407%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
56. 5/8/2012 BOARD STAFF’S REPLY TO RESPONDENT’S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO REARGUE ORDER & RESPONSE TO SUMMARY DISPOSITION – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=121560%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
55. 5/4/2012 RESPONDENT’S REPLY TO BOARD STAFF’S RESPONSE TO THE SUMMARY DISPOSITON MOTION – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=120941%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
54. 5/4/2012 RESPONDENT’S REPLY TO BOARD STAFF’S RESPONSE TO THE SUMMARY DISPOSTION MOTION – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=120929%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
53. 5/2/2012 RESPONDENT’S RESPONSE TO BOARD STAFF’S MOTION TO REARGUE ORDER # 12 – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=120259%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
52. 5/1/2012 BOARD STAFFS RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS SUPPLEMENTAL SUMMARY DISPOSITION MOTION – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=120058%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
51. 4/19/2012 BOARD STAFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER & VACATE ORDER # 12 – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=117876%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
50. 4/18/2012 RESPONDENT’S SUPPLEMENTAL SUMMARY DISPOSITION MOTION – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=117581%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
49. 4/6/2012 ORDER # 13 – MEMORIALIZING PRE – HEARING CONFERENCE & CONTINUING HEARING – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=115422%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
48. 4/5/2012 RESPONDENT’S OBJECTIONS TO BOARD STAFF’S PROPOSED EXHIBITS – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=114883%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
47. 4/5/2012 RESPONDENT’S EMERGENT REQUEST FOR PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=114793%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
46. 4/4/2012 ORDER # 12 – RULING ON RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION STAFF’S SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS, & MEMORIALIZING PARTIES’ STIPULATION OF FACTS – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=114773%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
45. 4/4/2012 BOARD STAFFS OBJECTIONS TO RESPONDENTS TRIAL EXHIBITS – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=114695%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
44. 3/30/2012 RESPONDENT’S REPLY TO THE BOARD STAFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE ON THE CONSOLIDATE MOTION FOR DISMISSAL & SUMMARY DISPOSITION – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=113893%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
43. 3/29/2012 RESPONDENT’S RESPONSE TO BOARD STAFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=113712%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
42. 3/27/2012 BOARD STAFF’S MOTION IN LIMINE – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=113138%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
41. 3/27/2012 RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO ADD EXHIBITS – R. JEFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=113086%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
40. 3/27/2012 NOTICE OF HEARING – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=113071%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
39. 3/27/2012 ORDER # 11 – CANCELING PREHEARING CONFERENCE – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=112953%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
38. 3/22/2012 BOARD STAFF’S SUPPLEMENTARY RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR DISMISSAL & SUMMARY DISPOSITION – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=112094%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
37. 3/22/2012 RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT’S PROPOSED TRIAL STIPULATIONS – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=112091%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
36. 3/13/2012 RESPONDENT’S RESPONSE TO THE BOARD STAFF’S PROPOSED STIPULATIONS & REQUEST FOR OFFICIAL NOTICE – RICHARD JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=110200%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
35. 3/12/2012 RESPONDENT’S SUPPLEMENTAL EXHIBIT LIST & EXHIBITS – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=110174%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
34. 3/12/2012 RESPONDENT’S WITNESS LIST & PROPOSED TRIAL STIPULATIONS – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=110153%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
33. 3/12/2012 BOARD STAFF’S REQUEST FOR OFFICIAL NOTICE – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=110124%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
32. 3/12/2012 BOARD STAFF’S REQUEST FOR OFFICIAL NOTICE – TBM
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=110114%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
31. 3/9/2012 BOARD STAFF’S TRIAL EXHIBITS – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=109936%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
30. 3/9/2012 RESPONDENT’S RESPONSE TO THE BOARD’S SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=109777%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
29. 3/8/2012 ORDER # 10 – SETTING ORAL HEARING ON RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY DISPOSITION – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=109447%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
28. 3/7/2012 BOARD STAFF’S RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT’S CONSOLIDATED MOTION FOR DISMISSAL & SUMMARY DISPOSITION – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=109270%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
27. 3/7/2012 ORDER # 9 – CLARIFYING TIME FOR CONVENING OF HEARING ON THE MERITS – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=109246%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
26. 2/29/2012 BOARD STAFF’S SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS TO RESPONDENT’S PLEADINGS – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=107502%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
25. 2/23/2012 RESPONDENT’S CONSOLIDATED MOTION TO DISMISS & SUMMARY DISPOSITION – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=105992%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
24. 2/9/2012 – SOAH – 1503-11-1669.MD D9377
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WebDocuments/StreamView.aspx
23. 2/9/2012 1ST AMENDED COMPLAINT – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=103764%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
22. 12/14/2011 ORDER # 8 – GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ADOPTION OF PREHEARING SCHEDULE – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=92389%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
21. 11/22/2011 REVISED PROPOSED PREHEARING SCHEDULE – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=88141%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
20. 10/18/2011 PROPOSED PRE-HEARING SCHEDULE – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=77823%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
19. 10/4/2011 CORRECTED ORDER # 7 – GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=74571%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
18. 10/4/2011 PROPOSED PRE-HEARING SCHEDULE – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=74499%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
17. 10/3/2011 ORDER # 6 – ADOPTING PREHEARING SCHEDULING ORDER – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=74420%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
16. 10/3/2011 BOARD STAFF & RESPONDENTS JOINT MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE & REQUEST TO RESET HEARING DATE – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=74293%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
5/10/2011
http://www.tmb.state.tx.us/news/May2011/TMB-Bulletin-May-2011.pdf
15. 3/9/2011 BOARD STAFF’S SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO RESPONDENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS & STRIKE – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=25099%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
14. 3/9/2011 UNOPPOSED PREHEARING SCHEDULE – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=25097%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
13. 3/8/2011 ORDER # 5 DENYING MOTION TO STRIKE – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=24672%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
12. 2/25/2011 ORDER # 4 GRANTING EXTENSION OF DEADLINE FOR FILING OF PROPOSED PREHEARING SCHEDULE – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=23098%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
11. 2/24/2011 MOTION TO DISMISS & STRIKE – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=22632%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
10. 2/24/2011 MOTION FOR EXTENSION TO FILE PROPOSED SCHEDULE – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=22623%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
9. 2/10/2011 ORDER # 3 MEMORIALIZING RULINGS MADE DURING TELEPHONIC PREHEARING CONFERENCE OF .2/10/2011 – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=20261%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
8. 1/27/2011 ORDER # 2 NOTICE OF TELEPHONIC PREHEARING CONFERENCE – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=17210%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
7. 1/27/2011 REQUEST PREHEARING CONFERENCE – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=17082%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
1/11/2011
http://www.tmb.state.tx.us/news/January2011/TMB-Bulletin-January-2011.pdf
6. 1/10/2011 ORDER # 1 REQUIRING PARTIES TO CONFER – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=13012%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
5. 12/29/2010 BOARD STAFFS RESPONSE TO RESPONDENTS ANSWER & REQUEST TO STRIKE UNDER RULE 155.157 – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=11111%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
4. 12/21/2010 RESPONDENTS ANSWER & REQUEST TO STRIKE UNDER RULE 155.157 – R. JAFFE
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=10430%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
12/8/2010
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WEBDOCS/e00/00/9B/00009B5A.pdf
SOAH – 503-11-1669.MD D9377
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WebDocuments/StreamView.aspx
3. 12/8/2010 CONFIRMATION – SOAH
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=7720%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
2 12/8/2010 COMPLAINT – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=7718%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
1. 12/8/2010 REQUEST TO DOCKET – TMB
https://cis.soah.state.tx.us/tokopenweb/tokweb24.ASP?WCI=docheader&%25DB=63%DRAWERID=9%DOCCOPYID=7717%MASK=N%tonew=Yes
Stanislaw Burzynski, M.D., Escapes Disciplinary Action, Stephen Barrett, M.D.
http://www.casewatch.org/board/med/burzynski/complaint_2010.shtml
5/6/2005
http://texinfo.library.unt.edu/texasregister/html/2005/may-06/in-addition/in-addition.html
5/6/2005
http://texinfo.library.unt.edu/texasregister/pdf/2005/0506is.pdf

6/6/2003
http://www.tmb.state.tx.us/professionals/calendar/minutes/doc/2003/June03/june%2003%20full%20board%20min.php

http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WebDocuments/StreamView.aspx
2/7/1996
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WebDocuments/StreamView.aspx
2/22/1995
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WebDocuments/StreamView.aspx
10/14/1994
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WebDocuments/StreamView.aspx
8/31/1994 – SOAH
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WebDocuments/StreamView.aspx
8/20/1994 Before the Texas State Medical Board of Medical Examiners, Stanislaw R. Burzynski, M.D., Ph.D., Docket No.503 – 92 – 529.
http://www.bioethicswatch.org/pd/burzynski_txorder19940831.pdf
8/15/1994 (8/19/1994)
http://texinfo.library.unt.edu/texasregister/text/1994/0819om.txt
8/14/1992 – SOAH
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WebDocuments/StreamView.aspx
7/12/1990 – SOAH
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WebDocuments/StreamView.aspx
9/6/1988 – SOAH
http://reg.tmb.state.tx.us/TMBPublicWebSite/WebDocuments/StreamView.aspx

Burzynski, the U.S., TMB, SOAH, and Quinlan

Here are links to:

1. Burzynski and the U.S.
http://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wiki-site.com/index.php/Main_Page

2. Burzynski and the Texas Medical Board / Texas State Office of Administrative Hearings
http://hypocriticaloath.scienceblog.com

3. Burzynski and Lola A. Quinlan
http://hypocriticaloath.scienceblog.com