Turkey Lurkey Thanksgiving Title

Traditionally, Thanksgiving is best known as the Holiday that the Detroit Lions get the “stuffing” knocked out of them

However, this year, it’s time to tender the tainted twisted trophy of Thanksgiving Turkey-Lurkey to Detroit’s toasted triumvirate treat of two-faced twerk-salad troll turpitude, and I have the temerity to tinker and tamper until I pay tribute with therapeutic levels of Thoreauness in response to GorskGeek’s misinformation, disinformation, and MisDisInformation (Missed ‘Dis Information)

Wednesday, 12/21/2005, Indianapolis, Indiana-based Eli Lilly and Company was treated to truthification, in connection with their illegal promotion (misbranding) of pharmaceutical drug EVISTA; (FDA approved for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women), in the:

a. prevention in risk of breast cancer

b. reduction in risk of breast cancer

Alleged in information, promoted drug as effective for reducing risk of breast cancer EVEN AFTER PROPOSED LABELING FOR THIS USE SPECIFICALLY REJECTED by FDA [1]

GorskGeek, being the breast cancer oncology specialist he claims to be, and so concerned about breast cancer patients that he is that “guy” who speaks out passionately about issues like the 10-year American Cancer Society Cancer Facts & Figures, “Estimated Breast Cancer Deaths for Women”, which reflect that in 2002, 39,600 (15%) women were estimated to die from breast cancer, and this year, 2013, the estimate is 39,620 (14%), which is 20 women MORE than 10-years ago, and who rails tirelessly about the ACS’s “Estimated New Breast Cancer cases in Women”, which 10-years ago was 203,500 (31%) in 2002, and now, in 2013 is 232,340 (29%), which is ONLY
28,840 MORE
than 10-years ago [2]

Now THAT’s progress !

GorskGeek, of course, must accomplish all this under his breath

But I’m sure you’re wondering, dear reader, what was GorskGeek’s outraged blog about this American pharmaceutical manufacturer coughing up $36 MILLION ?

Well, let me tell you … just as soon as I find it

Wait for it

Wait for it

Wait for it

GorskGeek was unable to bring himself to blog about Evista until exactly one year later, on 12/21/2006, and even then, he was “mum’s the word” about the breast cancer claims [3]

Perhaps GorskGeek just “knew” that eventually Evista would finally be approved by the FDA for Eli Lilly’s preventing or reducing risk of breast cancer claims on 9/13/2007, and who were those paper-pushing FDA apparatchiks to prevent Lilly from implementing their “Internal business plan” ? [4-9]

GorskGeek wouldn’t want to damage his slim and non-existent chance of getting some Eli Lilly money for research, by blogging anything that might in any way be possibly construed as him saying anything negatory about the BIG Pharma teat he longs to suck off of

After all, Bob ‘n’ Weave Blaskiewicz (who sees every molehill as a mountain), did say about GorskGeek, 9/28/2013 [10]:
——————————————————————
1:58:04
——————————————————————
“But he is a, the thing is, the thing is, you thing you have to understand is Gorski, Gorski is a genuine expert, in matters re re regarding on oncology studies

“I mean, he has a”

“He, He’s able to convince people, he’s able to convince people, on the strength of his record, to give him money to carry out research

“People who know what they’re talking about”

“To give him money to carry out his research”

“Right ?”
——————————————————————
1:59:00
——————————————————————
Yeah, right

Bobby 🙂

GorskGeek is hoping for a Happy Thanksgiving Golden Parachute; which is where he helps whistleblow about illegal BIG Pharma activity regarding some drug(s), which leaves him as the beneficiary of some funds like Mr. H. Dean Steinke, former Merck employee and his $68,190,000 MILLION from the federal government and states share of settlement amounts:
——————————————————————
$44,690,000 MILLIONMr. H. Dean Steinke, former Merck employee from federal share of settlement amount (1997 – 2001)
——————————————————————
$23.5 MILLIONMr. H. Dean Steinke, former Merck employee from the states share of settlement amount (1997 – 2001)
——————————————————————
Next, GorskGeek goes off on his fave autism prescription antipsychotic drug Risperdal, and the 11/4/2013, Monday, allegations concerning Global health care giant Johnson & Johnson (J&J) and its subsidiaries, $2.2 BILLION + fine regarding J&J Subsidiary Janssen (1999 – 2005) actions [11]
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – 12/21/2005
——————————————————————
EVISTA (FDA approved for prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in post-menopausal women)
——————————————————————
Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana-based company
——————————————————————
12/21/2005, Wednesday
——————————————————————
$36 MILLION
——————————————————————
In connection with illegal promotion of pharmaceutical drug
——————————————————————
Pleading guilty to criminal count of violating Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act by misbranding drug
——————————————————————
In addition to criminal plea
agreed to settle civil Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act liabilities by entering into consent decree of permanent injunction
——————————————————————
Charged in criminal information filed with violation of Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, following investigation by Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Office of Criminal Investigations
——————————————————————
Plea agreement signed by Lilly and United States

Complaint for permanent injunction

Consent decree of permanent injunction signed by company and United States
——————————————————————
Information alleges 1st year’s sales of drug in U.S. were disappointing compared to original forecast
——————————————————————
According to information
10/1998 – company reduced forecast of drug’s 1st year’s sales in U.S. from $401 million to $120 million
——————————————————————
Internal business plan noted:

“Disappointing year versus original forecast.”
——————————————————————
Information alleges in order to expand sales of drug, Lilly sought to broaden market for drug by promoting it for unapproved uses
——————————————————————
Information alleges strategic marketing plans and promotion touted drug as effective in preventing and reducing risk of diseases for which drug’s labeling lacked adequate directions for use
——————————————————————
According to information: Evista
1. brand team
2. sales representatives
promoted drug for:
a. prevention in risk of breast cancer
b. reduction in risk of breast cancer
c. reduction in risk of cardiovascular disease
——————————————————————
Under provisions of Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, drug misbranded when labeling didn’t bear adequate directions for each of intended uses
——————————————————————
Alleged in information, promoted drug as effective for reducing risk of breast cancer even after proposed labeling for this use specifically rejected by FDA
——————————————————————
Information alleges executed illegal conduct using number of tactics, including:

1. One-on-one sales pitches by sales representatives promoting drug to physicians about off-label uses of drug

2. Sales representatives trained to prompt or bait questions by doctors in order to promote drug for unapproved uses

3. Encouraging sales representatives promoting drug to send unsolicited medical letters to promote drug for unapproved use to doctors on their sales routes

4. Organizing “market research summit’ during which drug was discussed with physicians for unapproved uses, including reducing risk of breast cancer

5.
a. Creating
b. distributing
to sales representatives “Evista Best Practices” videotape, in which sales representative states “Evista truly is the best drug for the prevention of all these diseases” referring to:

1). osteoporosis
2). breast cancer
3). cardiovascular disease
——————————————————————
Complaint for permanent injunction alleges executed illegal conduct using number of tactics, including:

1. Training sales representatives to promote drug for prevention and reduction in risk of breast cancer by use of medical reprint in way that highlighted key results of drug and thereby promoted drug to doctors for unapproved use

2. Some sales representatives were instructed to hide disclosure page of reprint which noted:

a. “All of the authors were either employees or paid consultants of Eli Lilly at the time this article was written,”

b. “The prescribing information provides that “The effectiveness of [Evista] in reducing the risk of breast cancer has not yet been established.””

3. Organizing “consultant meetings” for physicians who prescribed drug during which unapproved uses of drug discussed

4. Calculating incremental new prescriptions for doctors who attended Evista advisory board meetings in 1998

5. advisory board meetings included discussion of unapproved uses for drug

6. By measuring and analyzing incremental new prescriptions for doctors who attended advisory board meetings, Lilly was using this intervention as tool to promote and sell drug
——————————————————————
In addition to agreeing to plead guilty to criminal information and plea agreement signed by Lilly, settlement with United States includes following components:

(a) agreed to settle civil Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act liabilities by entering into consent decree of permanent injunction

(1). As part of consent decree, agreed to comply with terms of permanent injunction, which will require company to implement effective training and supervision of marketing and sales staff for drug, and ensure any future off-label marketing conduct is detected and corrected

(2). agreed to be permanently enjoined from directly or indirectly promoting drug for use in:

a. preventing or reducing risk of breast cancer

b. reducing risk of cardiovascular disease

c. or for any other unapproved use in manner that violates Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act unless and until FDA approves drug for additional use or uses
——————————————————————
(b) as part of consent decree, agreed to hire and utilize independent organization to conduct reviews to assist Lilly in assessing and evaluating Lilly’s

1. systems
2. processes
3. policies
4. procedures
relating to promotion of drug and company’s compliance with consent decree
——————————————————————
FDA made following announcement to postmenopausal women who have taken drug for prevention or treatment of osteoporosis:
——————————————————————
“No postmenopausal woman who has taken Evista for the prevention or treatment of osteoporosis is affected by this action, as this matter today relates only to unapproved uses of Evista.”
——————————————————————
Defendant agreed to plead guilty to charge in information
——————————————————————
Defendant agreed to resolve complaint for permanent injunction by agreeing to consent decree of permanent injunction
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2005/December/05_civ_685.html
======================================
[2] – 11/13/2013 – The War on Cancer (I don’t think it means, what you think it says it means) #Winning?:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/13/httpcancer-orgacsgroupscontentepidemiologysurveilancedocumentsdocumentacspc-036845-pdf/
======================================
[3] – 12/21/2006 – On the messiness of evidence-based medicine
——————————————————————
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2006/12/21/the-messiness-of-evidencebased-medicine/
======================================
[4] – 9/13/2007FDA Approval for Raloxifene Hydrochloride (Brand name(s): Evista®): Approved for breast cancer risk reduction:
——————————————————————
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/druginfo/fda-raloxifene-hydrochloride
======================================
[5] – 9/14/2007FDA Approves New Uses for Evista: Drug Reduces Risk of Invasive Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women:
——————————————————————
http://www.fda.gov/newsevents/newsroom/pressannouncements/2007/ucm108981.htm
======================================
[6] – 9/17/2007Evista Approved for Reducing Breast Cancer Risk:
——————————————————————
http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm048474.htm
======================================
[7] – 2007
——————————————————————
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/020815s018lbl.pdf
======================================
[8]
——————————————————————
http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm088593.pdf
======================================
[9] – 2007
——————————————————————
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2007/022042lbl.pdf
======================================
[10] – 10/18/2013 – Deconstructing Dr. David H. (Orac) Gorski – September 28, 2013 “The Skeptics™” Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/18/deconstructing-dr-david-h-orac-gorski-september-28-2013-the-skeptics-burzynski-discussion-by-bob-blaskiewicz-21951/
======================================
[11] – 11/4/2013
——————————————————————
http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2013/November/13-ag-1170.html
======================================

USA TODAY CENSORS 18 comments of Military Veteran who Protected Their “Right to Free Speech” (They post 119 comments of “The Skeptics™” Troll, Lawrence McNamara) BIAS, CENSORED, CENSORING, CENSORSHIP by BIASED CENSOR

20131116-002818.jpg
——————————————————————
1 – I
——————————————————————

20131118-085814.jpg

20131118-085835.jpg
——————————————————————
2 – Call
——————————————————————

20131118-085905.jpg
——————————————————————
3 – Out
——————————————————————

20131118-085933.jpg
——————————————————————
4 – the
——————————————————————

20131118-085953.jpg
——————————————————————
5 – Intellectual
——————————————————————

20131118-090034.jpg
——————————————————————
6 – Cowards
——————————————————————

20131118-090101.jpg
——————————————————————
7 – of
——————————————————————

20131118-090134.jpg

20131118-090227.jpg
——————————————————————
8 – Cowardice
——————————————————————

20131118-090311.jpg
——————————————————————
9 – at
——————————————————————

20131118-090354.jpg
——————————————————————
10 – USA
——————————————————————

20131118-090424.jpg

20131118-090505.jpg
——————————————————————
11 – TODAY
——————————————————————

20131118-090539.jpg

20131118-090703.jpg
——————————————————————
12 – NATION
——————————————————————

20131118-090815.jpg
——————————————————————
13 – Liz Szabo
——————————————————————

20131118-090848.jpg
——————————————————————
14
——————————————————————

20131118-090928.jpg
——————————————————————
15
——————————————————————

20131118-090958.jpg
——————————————————————
16
——————————————————————

20131118-091048.jpg
——————————————————————
17
——————————————————————

20131118-091118.jpg

20131118-091147.jpg

20131118-091228.jpg
——————————————————————
18
——————————————————————

20131118-091324.jpg
——————————————————————
19
——————————————————————

20131118-091415.jpg
——————————————————————
20
——————————————————————

20131118-091441.jpg

20131118-091524.jpg
——————————————————————
21-22
——————————————————————

20131118-091613.jpg
——————————————————————
23
——————————————————————

20131118-091652.jpg
——————————————————————
24
——————————————————————

20131118-091731.jpg
——————————————————————
25
——————————————————————

20131118-091806.jpg
——————————————————————
26
——————————————————————

20131118-091838.jpg
——————————————————————
27
——————————————————————

20131118-091912.jpg
——————————————————————
28
——————————————————————

20131118-092122.jpg
——————————————————————
29
——————————————————————

20131118-092216.jpg
——————————————————————
30
——————————————————————

20131118-092300.jpg
——————————————————————
31
——————————————————————

20131118-092321.jpg

20131118-092345.jpg
——————————————————————
32
——————————————————————

20131118-092413.jpg
——————————————————————
33
——————————————————————

20131118-092505.jpg

20131118-092532.jpg

20131118-092610.jpg
——————————————————————
34
——————————————————————

20131118-092650.jpg

20131118-092813.jpg

20131118-103329.jpg
——————————————————————
35
——————————————————————

20131118-103352.jpg
——————————————————————
36-37
——————————————————————

20131118-103410.jpg

20131118-103438.jpg
——————————————————————
38
——————————————————————

20131118-103505.jpg
——————————————————————
39
——————————————————————

20131118-103541.jpg
——————————————————————
40
——————————————————————

20131118-103606.jpg
——————————————————————
41
——————————————————————

20131118-103639.jpg
——————————————————————
42
——————————————————————

20131118-103712.jpg
——————————————————————
43
——————————————————————

20131118-103743.jpg
——————————————————————
44
——————————————————————

20131118-103805.jpg
——————————————————————
45
——————————————————————

20131118-103833.jpg
——————————————————————
46
——————————————————————

20131118-103858.jpg
——————————————————————
47
——————————————————————

20131118-103922.jpg

20131118-103955.jpg
——————————————————————
48
——————————————————————

20131118-104025.jpg
——————————————————————
49
——————————————————————

20131118-104057.jpg
——————————————————————
50
——————————————————————

20131118-104121.jpg
——————————————————————
51
——————————————————————

20131118-104156.jpg
——————————————————————
52
——————————————————————

20131118-104236.jpg
——————————————————————
53
——————————————————————

20131118-104312.jpg
——————————————————————
54
——————————————————————

20131118-104344.jpg

20131118-104411.jpg
——————————————————————
55
——————————————————————

20131118-104442.jpg
——————————————————————
56
——————————————————————

20131118-104510.jpg
——————————————————————
57
——————————————————————

20131118-104616.jpg
——————————————————————
58
——————————————————————

20131118-104644.jpg
——————————————————————
59
——————————————————————

20131118-104722.jpg
——————————————————————
60
——————————————————————

20131118-104752.jpg
——————————————————————
61
——————————————————————

20131118-104854.jpg
——————————————————————
62
——————————————————————

20131118-104926.jpg
——————————————————————
63
——————————————————————

20131118-110244.jpg
——————————————————————
64
——————————————————————

20131118-110302.jpg
——————————————————————
65
——————————————————————

20131118-110321.jpg
——————————————————————
66
——————————————————————

20131118-110339.jpg
——————————————————————
67
——————————————————————

20131118-110357.jpg
——————————————————————
68
——————————————————————

20131118-110418.jpg
——————————————————————
69
——————————————————————

20131118-110439.jpg
——————————————————————
70
——————————————————————

20131118-110503.jpg

20131118-110524.jpg
——————————————————————
71
——————————————————————

20131118-110547.jpg
——————————————————————
72
——————————————————————

20131118-110628.jpg
——————————————————————
73
——————————————————————

20131118-110654.jpg
——————————————————————
74
——————————————————————

20131118-110720.jpg
——————————————————————
75
——————————————————————

20131118-110744.jpg
——————————————————————
76
——————————————————————

20131118-110813.jpg
——————————————————————
77
——————————————————————

20131118-110921.jpg

20131118-110949.jpg
——————————————————————
78
——————————————————————

20131118-111012.jpg
——————————————————————
79
——————————————————————

20131118-111051.jpg
——————————————————————
80
——————————————————————

20131118-111128.jpg
——————————————————————
81
——————————————————————

20131118-111154.jpg
——————————————————————
82
——————————————————————

20131118-111229.jpg
——————————————————————
83
——————————————————————

20131118-113729.jpg
——————————————————————
84
——————————————————————

20131118-113749.jpg
——————————————————————
85
——————————————————————

20131118-113807.jpg
——————————————————————
86
——————————————————————

20131118-113823.jpg

20131118-113840.jpg
——————————————————————
87
——————————————————————

20131118-113856.jpg

20131118-113921.jpg

20131118-113954.jpg

20131118-114026.jpg
——————————————————————
88
——————————————————————

20131118-114047.jpg
——————————————————————
89
——————————————————————

20131118-114110.jpg
——————————————————————
90
——————————————————————

20131118-114130.jpg
——————————————————————
91
——————————————————————

20131118-114148.jpg

20131118-114208.jpg
——————————————————————
92
——————————————————————

20131118-114227.jpg

20131118-114252.jpg
——————————————————————
93
——————————————————————

20131118-114334.jpg
——————————————————————
94
——————————————————————

20131118-114401.jpg
——————————————————————
95
——————————————————————

20131118-114453.jpg

20131118-114542.jpg
——————————————————————
96
——————————————————————

20131118-114627.jpg
——————————————————————
97
——————————————————————

20131118-114744.jpg
——————————————————————
98
——————————————————————

20131118-114818.jpg
——————————————————————
99
——————————————————————

20131118-114838.jpg
——————————————————————
100
——————————————————————

20131118-114858.jpg

20131118-114913.jpg
——————————————————————
101
——————————————————————

20131118-114942.jpg
——————————————————————
102
——————————————————————

20131118-115020.jpg
——————————————————————
103
——————————————————————

20131118-115153.jpg

20131118-115214.jpg
——————————————————————
104
——————————————————————

20131118-115235.jpg

20131118-115317.jpg
——————————————————————
105
——————————————————————

20131118-115344.jpg
——————————————————————
106
——————————————————————

20131118-115434.jpg

20131118-115524.jpg
——————————————————————
107
——————————————————————

20131118-115546.jpg
——————————————————————
108
——————————————————————

20131118-115609.jpg
——————————————————————
109
——————————————————————

20131118-115638.jpg
——————————————————————
110
——————————————————————

20131118-115658.jpg
——————————————————————
111
——————————————————————

20131118-115719.jpg
——————————————————————
112
——————————————————————

20131118-115747.jpg
——————————————————————
113
——————————————————————

20131118-115824.jpg
——————————————————————
114
——————————————————————

20131118-115846.jpg
——————————————————————
115
——————————————————————

20131118-115906.jpg
——————————————————————
116
——————————————————————

20131118-115926.jpg
——————————————————————
117
——————————————————————

20131118-115955.jpg
——————————————————————
118
——————————————————————

20131118-122156.jpg
——————————————————————

20131120-074305.jpg
======================================
18 Censored Comments – Critiquing: Doctor accused of selling false hope to families (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY):
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/16/httpwww-usatoday-comstorynewsnation20131115stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy2994561/
======================================
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – 11/15/2013 – USA TODAY NEWS, NATION
Experts dismiss doctor’s cancer claim
Liz Szabo, USA TODAY
——————————————————————
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/burzynski-cancer-science/2994731/
======================================
[1] – 11/16/2013 – Critiquing: Experts dismiss doctor’s cancer claims (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY):
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/16/httpwww-usatoday-comstorynewsnation20131115burzynski-cancer-science2994731/
======================================
[2] – 11/15/2013 – USA TODAY NEWS, NATION
Doctor accused of selling false hope to families
Liz Szabo, USA TODAY
——————————————————————
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy/2994561/
======================================
[2] – 11/16/2013 – Critiquing: Doctor accused of selling false hope to families (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY):
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/16/httpwww-usatoday-comstorynewsnation20131115stanislaw-burzynski-cancer-controversy2994561/
======================================
[3] – 11/15/2013 – USA TODAY NEWS, NATION
Families run out of hope, money after cancer treatments
Liz Szabo, USA TODAY:
——————————————————————
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/11/15/jeanine-graf-cancer-children/2994675/
======================================
[3] – 11/17/2013 – Critiquing: Families run out of hope, money after cancer treatments (USA TODAY NEWS, NATION, Liz Szabo, USA TODAY):
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/11/17/httpwww-usatoday-comstorynewsnation20131115jeanine-graf-cancer-children2994675/
======================================

“The Skeptics™” Mark McAndrew is Trollolo

20131025-023211.jpg
“The Skeptics™” Mark McAndrew #whining on “The Telegraph” while citing Guy Chapman’s blog, claims I shouldn’t be citing my own blog, but he does NOT have any problem whatsoever with his Skeptic guy friend, Guy Chapman, citing HIS own blog

HYPOCRITE

This is why I’m Hipocritical of “The Skeptics™”

Hipocritical
Hippocrates
Hypocrite
critical
critic

Mark McAndrew citing Guy Chapman’s (blahg) blog

20131025-023055.jpg
Guy Chapman citing his own (blahg) blog TWICE

20131025-022922.jpg
Guy Chapman citing his own (blahg) blog TWICE

20131025-022943.jpg
Guy Chapman citing his own (blahg) blog

20131025-023000.jpg
Guy Chapman citing his own (blahg) blog

20131025-023018.jpg

20131025-023037.jpg
Note below, how the moderator leaves my comment as “This comment is awaiting moderation. Show comment”, so that the reader has to select “Show comment” in order to see my reply

20131025-023134.jpg

20131023-193549.jpg
Guy Chapman

All of homeopathy, or just the imponderables?
——————————————————————
Didymus Judas Thomas

Mr. Chapman, I’m quite surprised that you’ve been mum about this particular Homeopathy publication on PubMed?

Cell Biochem Funct. 2013 Feb 13. doi: 10.1002/cbf.2960
[Epub ahead of print]

Stimulation of natural killer cells for homoeopathic complexes: An in vitro and in vivo pilot study in advanced cancer patients.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23408699/
Guy Chapman does NOT want to acknowledge that this publication exists

20131023-181712.jpg
Note below, Mark McAndrew’s comment which gets deleted

20131023-182313.jpg

20131025-023115.jpg
Mark McAndrew, you must be the Troll under the bridge that people have to cross to get to the party

20131025-105643.jpg
#8 – Mark McAndrew – October 22, 2013

Thanks Orac, great takedown

Perhaps you should ask the Telegraph for right of reply?

As a real oncologist (whose entire profession is under attack by these pricks) you have the moral authority to demand it

Comments were fun tho

Although debating the spectacular embarrassment that is Sandra Courtney was a bit like going ten rounds with a propped-up corpse

Good exercise, but not exactly testing

Nor hygienic

BTW, lilady, you’ve accidently upvoted one of the Demented One’s posts, the entirely non-ironic

“I think I have exposed your and other skeptics’ credibility as well

Actually, better than you think you have tarnished mine

More batty arrogance on display.”

(Is it true she reckons magic water saved her life from mercury poisoning from her fillings?

Gods, what a freak!)

20131026-125644.jpg
======================================
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – “The Skeptics™” Bum Rush “The Telegraph” (@Telegraph): I Feel Empowered, In Control Of My Body: Four Women On Fighting Cancer With Alternative Therapies http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10383724/I-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies.html
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/23/the-telegraph-telegraph-i-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies/
======================================
[2] – Bias Biased “The Telegraph” Censor “Telegraph” Censors “The Daily Telegraph” Censored “The Sunday Telegraph” Censoring Censorship (@Telegraph): I Feel Empowered, In Control Of My Body: Four Women On Fighting Cancer With Alternative Therapies http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10383724/I-feel-empowered-in-control-of-my-body-four-women-on-fighting-cancer-with-alternative-therapies.html
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/25/bias-biased-the-telegraph-censor-telegraph-censors-the-daily-telegraph-censored-the-sunday-telegraph-censoring-censorship/

20131025-023156.jpg

The Biggest Loser: “The Skeptics™” Guy Chapman (guychapman @vGuyUK @SceptiGuy) http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/ – September 28, 2013 “The Skeptics™” Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51

20131018-133713.jpg
[1] – September 28, 2013 “The Skeptics™” Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51
======================================
“CITE ONE EXAMPLE, of a SKEPTIC MAKING SHIT for a BURZYNSKI shill OR ANYONE ELSE in REAL LIFE”

“That’s a quote”

“That’s, that’s something coming in from, from GUY (CHAPMAN)
——————————————————————
1:36:00

20131018-133742.jpg

20131018-125758.jpg
======================================
2/18/2013 – 5:00pm – Anna Capunay to GUY CHAPMAN: You also should JUST LEAVE ME ALONE
======================================

20131018-125849.jpg
======================================
2/18/2013 – 5:04pm – Anna Capunay: #SKEPTICS LEAVE ME ALONE
======================================

20131018-125904.jpg

20131018-174055.jpg
======================================
2/18/2013 – 5:21pm – Anna Capunay to GUY CHAPMAN: I’m going to politely ask that you STOP ATTACKING my mothers health
======================================

20131018-125922.jpg
======================================
2/18/2013 – 5:23pm – Anna Capunay to GUY CHAPMAN: Again, I will politely ask that you STOP ATTACKING my mothers health
======================================

20131018-125943.jpg</a
======================================
2/18/2013 – 5:31pm – Anna Capunay to GUY CHAPMAN: I’m going to politely ask you ONE MORE TIME to STOP ATTACKING my mothers life. THIS is NOW HARASSMENT
======================================

20131018-125959.jpg
======================================
2/18/2013 – 5:31pm – BurzynskiSaves to Anna Capunay and GUY CHAPMAN: @annacapunay appears to me (& all watching) this troll @SceptiGuy popped up to ATTACK after you announced good results of your mom
======================================

20131018-130218.jpg
======================================
2/18/2013 – 5:47pm – Anna Capunay to GUY CHAPMAN: I really don’t know how many times I have to ask you to please STOP the HARASSMENT
======================================

20131018-130016.jpg
======================================
2/21/2013 – 8:29pm – Anna Capunay to GUY CHAPMAN: I’d really appreciate if you’d STOP HARASSING ME and my choices. Please STOP HATING the fact that my mother is alive
======================================

20131018-130032.jpg
======================================
2/21/2013 – 8:31pm – Anna Capunay to GUY CHAPMAN: Please STOP HARASSING ME and please STOP HATING that my mother is alive
======================================

20131018-130047.jpg
======================================
2/21/2013 – 8:32pm – Anna Capunay to GUY CHAPMAN: HARASSMENT IS SERIOUS and I’d appreciate if you’d STOP TRYING to BULLY ME
======================================

20131018-130104.jpg
======================================
2/21/2013 – 8:55pm – Anna Capunay to GUY CHAPMAN: I think guy needs a girlfriend or something cause HARASSMENT is OUT OF CONTROL
======================================

20131018-130123.jpg
======================================
2/22/2013 – 5:06am – Anna Capunay to GUY CHAPMAN: Then do yourself a favor and STOP TWEETING ME. It’s as simple as that YOU MASOCHIST
======================================

20131018-130139.jpg
======================================
2/22/2013 – 8:10am – Anna Capunay retweeted to GUY CHAPMAN: #Burzynski isn’t making the claim here. It’s @annacapunay saying that mom’s life was saved. STOP HATING. AWFUL
======================================

20131018-130159.jpg

20131018-133828.jpg
======================================
After reading the above Tweets, IT’S READILY APPARENT WHO HAS “DEMONSTRATED THAT HE’s STUCK in a WORLD of MASSIVE COGNITIVE DISSONANCE”
======================================

20131018-133844.jpg
======================================
We ALL KNOW WHO “HAS DUG HIMSELF INTO A DEEP HOLE”
======================================

20131018-133901.jpg
What do you NOT understand about THIS, High School Science Teacher ?
======================================
[1] – September 28, 2013 “The Skeptics™” Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51
======================================
DJT – Didymus Judas Thomas
——————————————————————
BB – Bob Blaskiewicz
======================================
0:32:07
——————————————————————
DJT – And my other point is that, uhmmm, when these trials finish, as I’ve pointed out on my blog, M.D. Anderson finished a trial in 2006 and didn’t publish the results electronically until January of this year

So, just think

Burzynski’s 1st trial we know that finished in 2009

So we would still have more years to go before he caught up to M.D. Anderson as far as publishing

So for him to actually be trying to publish stuff now and The Lancet not publishing because they have other stuff to do, put in there, that’s understandable
——————————————————————
0:33:03
——————————————————————
1:44:00
——————————————————————
DJT – So I can say that since the Mayo Clinic (Correction: M.D. Anderson) finished their study in 2006, and it took them until 2013, to actually publish it, then I can say, well, Burzynski finished his in 2009, which was 3 years later, which would give Burzynski until 2016
——————————————————————
1:46:00
——————————————————————
2:11:02
——————————————————————
BB“Why wasn’t that study”
——————————————————————
DJTfor me to make up my mind (laughing)
——————————————————————
BB“Why wasn’t that, that that that, still . . again, it it doesn’t seem really to to approach the the the, main question here”

“You know, um . . what are the standards that you have that it isn’t, what are your standards to show that it isn’t efficacious ?”
——————————————————————
2:12:05
——————————————————————
DJT – Well I can say, well I’m going to have to wait, the same amount of time I had to wait for Mayo (Clarification: M.D. Anderson) to publish their study; which was from 2006 to 2013
——————————————————————
2:14:07
——————————————————————
BB“So, if you’re unsure about this stuff, if you’re unsure about the the time to publication, why are you defending it so hard, other than saying, “I don’t know, I really need to””
——————————————————————
DJTWhy am I unsure ?
——————————————————————
BB“Uh about the”
—————————————————————
DJT – (laughing) I just gave you an example
——————————————————————
BB“The reasons, the reasons for which that he’s, no, why are you defending him so hard, when you’re unsure ?”
——————————————————————
DJT – Oh, who said I was unsure ?

I just gave you an example
——————————————————————
2:15:02
——————————————————————

20131018-133913.jpg
======================================
When are YOU going to MAN UP ?
======================================

20131018-133940.jpg
======================================
Still waiting for you to name the “open forum”, you twit
======================================

20131018-125831.jpg
======================================
#EPIC SKEPTIC #FAIL
======================================
======================================
[1] – September 28, 2013 “The Skeptics™” Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/04/september-28-2013-the-skeptics-burzynski-discussion-by-bob-blaskiewicz-21951/
======================================
[2]
——————————————————————
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/
=============================

20131018-133727.jpg