Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog

Stanislaw Rajmund Burzynski, Stanislaw R. Burzynski, Stanislaw Burzynski, Stan R. Burzynski, Stan Burzynski, S. R. BURZYNSKI, S. Burzynski, Arthur Burzynski, Hippocrates Hypocrite Hypocrites Critic Critics Critical HipoCritical

Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog

Main menu

  • Home
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • .
  • 1
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 1998 (1/15/1998)
  • 1999 (2/1999) Volume 74 Number 2 pg. 137 – 3 pgs.
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • About
  • List of Articles

Tag Archives: waste

How to Crank your Congressperson (according to “The Skeptics”: USA TODAY vs. Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski)

Posted on December 7, 2013 by didymusjudasthomas
Reply

Let’s say you’re one of “The Skeptics,” (“The Burzynski Skeptics,”) don’t have a life (but doesn’t that go without saying ?), enjoy associating yourself with known liars, cowards, ethically and intellectually challenged individuals, so you grab a newspaper (It’s doubtful that USA TODAY would qualify), and if you do NOT know what a “Newsie” is, go online and select an article which has a plethora of innuendo and allegations, compose a missive to your member in Congress assembled about the nothingness you just reviewed, just don’t piss yourself silly when you shoot that zinger off, because you’ve just sent something to your Congressperson, exhibiting what a whacky weed tobacco day tripper you are, and a prime example of what “Rocky Mountain High” really will mean, starting January 1st, 2014

Congratulations, Colorado

My only suggestion is that you add something like:

“Dear Congressperson Y,

I know your time is valuable, but please allow me to waste some of you and your staff’s, as well as provide you with “fodder” you can hang up on the bathroom wall and laugh about for days!

In the next weeks I will be contacting you about all of the “conspiracy theories” in Jesse Ventura’s book, including; but not limited to:

Area 51
Aliens
The Denver International Airport
…

Smoke ’em if ya got ’em !
======================================

20131206-185142.jpg
Letter to Congress

Dear CONGRESSPERSON’S NAME:

My name is _______ and I am one of your constituents

I am writing to you to request your urgent attention to a matter that involves the abuse of cancer patients, their families, and their communities

A few weeks ago, I wrote to you concerning the Houston cancer doctor Stanislaw Burzynski, and requested that you take action and look into how he was able to continue treating cancer patients for decades under the auspices of clinical trials with an unproven treatment he claims to have discovered, patented, manufactures, prescribes, and sells (at his in house pharmacy) at exorbitant prices

On Friday November 15, Dr. Burzynski was the subject of a front-page exposé in the USA Today

Additionally, since I last contacted your office, the FDA has released site inspection notes into the electronic FOIA reading room about Stanislaw Burzynski in his role as Principal Investigator (also included)

The findings were horrifying

Burzynski (as investigator, the subject of the inspection) “failed to comply with protocol requirements related to the primary outcome, therapeutic response […] for 67% of study subjects reviewed during the inspection.”

This means that several patients who were reported as “complete responses” did not meet the criteria defined in the investigational plan, as were patients who were reported as having a “partial response” and “stable disease.”

This means that his outcomes figures for these studies are inaccurate

Some patients admitted failed to meet the inclusion criteria for the study

Even though patients needed to have a physician back home to monitor their progress prior to enrolling in a trial, the FDA found a patient who began receiving treatment before a doctor had been found

The FDA told Burzynski:

“You failed to protect the rights, safety, and welfare of subjects under your care

Forty-eight (48) subjects experienced 102 investigational overdoses between January 1, 2005 and February 22, 2013, according to the [trial number redacted] List of Hospitalizations/SAE (serious adverse events) [redacted] Overdose [redacted]/Catheter Infection report

Overdose incidents have been reported to you [….]

There is no documentation to show that you have implemented corrective actions during this time period to ensure the safety and welfare of subjects.” [emphasis added]

It seems that these overdoses are related to the protocol, which requires family members to administer the drugs via programmable pump on their own

Further, patient records show that there were many more overdoses that were not included in the Hospitalization/SAE/Overdose list

The FDA reported:

“Your […] tumor measurements initially recorded on worksheets at baseline and on-study treatment […] studies for all study subjects were destroyed and are not available for FDA inspectional review.”

This is one of the most damning statements, as without any…not a single baseline measurement…there is no way to determine any actual effect of the antineoplaston treatment

This means that Burzynski’s studies–which by last account cost $30,000 to begin and $7000 a month to maintain–are unpublishable

It will be stunning if this finding alone were not investigated by legal authorities

Patients who had Grade 3 or 4 toxic effects were supposed to be removed from treatment

One patient had 3 Grade 3 events followed by 3 Grade 4 events

Another patient had 7 disqualifying toxic events before he was removed from the study

Burzynski did not report all adverse events as required by his study protocols

One patient had 12 events of hypernatremia (high sodium), none of which was reported

There are several similar patients

Some adverse events were not reported to the Burzynski Clinic IRB for years

For instance one patient had an adverse event in 1998 and the oversight board did not hear about it until 2005.)

The FDA observed that the informed consent document did not include a statement of extra costs that might be incurred

Specifically, some informed consent documents were signed days to weeks before billing agreements, and in a couple of cases no consent form could be found

The clinic was unable to account for its stock of the investigational drug, an act that would get any other research lab shut down

Sadly, a child, Josia Cotto, had to die from apparent sodium overload before this investigation could be carried out

Despite these findings, when interviewed by USA Today, Burzynski actually said of his former cancer patients:

“As for criticism from former patients, Burzynski says, ‘We see patients from various walks of life

We see great people

We see crooks

We have prostitutes

We have thieves

We have mafia bosses

We have Secret Service agents

Many people are coming to us, OK?

Not all of them are the greatest people in the world

And many of them would like to get money from us

They pretend they got sick and they would like to extort money from us.’”

I am asking you to help me understand what happened at the FDA to allow this man to conduct clinical trials and bankrupt patients in the process despite 10 years of alarming reviews by the FDA

I also ask you to support an investigation into this betrayal of over 8,000 patients and to push for legislation to prevent the most desperate patients from such unthinkable exploitation

I will be calling your office next week to touch base with you and I look forward to your response

Sincerely,
======================================
REFERENCE:
======================================
Letter to Congress:
——————————————————————
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hx3KJ6mmCd8MTdlbdXb2r2qrN9l3JjrzdJrHh0VIJXo/mobilebasic?pli=1
======================================
Burzynski: court cases
—————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/burzynski-court-cases/
—————————————————————
Main Page – Stanislawrajmundburzynski
——————————————————————
http://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wiki-site.com/index.php/Main_Page
======================================

Advertisement
Posted in adverse effects, Antineoplastons (ANP), bias, biased, Bob Blaskiewicz (Robert J. Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz), critique, critiques, critiqued, critiquing, FDA, United States Food and Drug Administration, Gorski ScienceBlogs.com/Insolence ScienceBasedMedicine, humor, comedy, Nicholas Patronas, M.D., Stanislaw Rajmund Burzynski, The Skeptics | Tagged " member in Congress assembled", "adverse event", "adverse events", "antineoplaston treatment", "Area 51", "blogger at skepticalhumanities.com", "Bob Blaskiewicz Faux Skeptic Exposed!", "Burzynski: court cases", "Center for Inquiry", "Committee for Skeptical Inquiry", "CONGRESSPERSON’S", "consent form", "conspiracy theories", "day tripper", "Denver International Airport", "Didymus Judas Thomas’ Hipocritical Oath Blog", "doctor Stanislaw Burzynski", "Dr. Burzynski", "Eau Claire", "Forty-eight", "front-page", "Grade 3 events", "Grade 3 or 4", "Grade 4 events", "Hospitalizations/SAE serious adverse events", "How to Crank your Congressperson (according to The Skeptics: USA TODAY vs. Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski)", "http://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wiki-site.com/", "http://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wiki-site.com/index.php/", "http://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wiki-site.com/index.php/Main_Page", "https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/burzynski-court-cases/", "https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/12/07/how-to-crank-your-congressperson-according-to-the-skeptics-usa-today-vs-dr-stanislaw-burzynski/", "https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Hx3KJ6mmCd8MTdlbdXb2r2qrN9l3JjrzdJrHh0VIJXo/mobilebasic?pli=1", "in house", "informed consent", "investigational plan", "Jesse Ventura", "Josia Cotto", "JREF Swift Blog contributor", "Letter to Congress", "Main Page – Stanislawrajmundburzynski", "Northeast Conference on Science and Skepticism", "on-study treatment", "Over dose", "patient records", "principal investigator", "Secret Service", "Skeptical Inquirer", "Skeptical Inquiry", "Skepticality podcast", "Smoke ‘em if ya got ‘em", "St. Louis, "staff’s", "stanislawrajmundburzynski.wiki-site.com/", "The Burzynski Skeptics", "The Virtual Skeptics", "toxic effects", "toxic events", "trial number", "U.S. Food and Drug Administration", "University of Wisconsin", "USA TODAY vs. Dr. Stanislaw Burzynski", "USA TODAY", "Visiting Assistant Professor of Writing at the University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire", "web columnist", "whacky weed tobacco", #FAILED, able, about, abuse, According, accordingly, account, Act, action, actions, actual, actually, add, added, Additionally, administer, admitted, Adverse, agents, ago, agreements, alarming, Aliens, allegations, allow, alone, also, another, any, apparent, are, article, ask, asking, associating, attention, auspices, authorities, available, “cancer patients", “complete responses”, “Conspiracy Guy”, “Dear Congressperson Y", “Down, “high sodium", “Look, “one”, “Rocky Mountain High”, bankrupt, base, baseline, bathroom, before, began, begin, betrayal, billing, Blatherskitewicz, Board, book, bosses, Burzynski Clinic, CALLING, Cancer, cancerous, care, carried, cases, catheter, challenged, child, claims, clinic, Clinical, Clinical Trials, Colorado, coming, communities, comply, compose, concerning, conduct, Congratulations, Congress, Congressperson, consent, constituents, contacted, contacting, continue, corrective, cost, costs, could, couple, cowards, CRANK, criteria, criteria defined, criticism, crooks, damning, days, dear, decades, desperate, Despite, destroyed, determine, die, discovered, disqualifying, Doctor, document, documentation, documents, Doubtful, drug, drugs, during, effect, electronic, emphasis, enjoy, enrolling, ensure, ethically, event, example, exhibiting, exorbitant, experienced, exploitation, Expose, extort, extra, F.D.A., families, family, FDA, few, figures, finding, findings, fodder, FOIA, followed, Food and Drug Administration, For, former, forward, found, from, further, get, got, grab, great, greatest, hang, happened, have, having, hear, help, his, horrifying, hospitalization, Houston, how, http://anp4all.com, http://blog.rbutr.com/, http://centerforinquiry.net/speakers/blaskiewicz_bob, http://lanyrd.com/2013/tam/sckkdy/, http://necss.org/speakers/bob-blaskiewicz/, http://rbutr.com/, http://skepticalhumanities.com/, http://thehoustoncancerquack.com/, http://uwec.edu/Staff/blaskir/, http://virtualskeptics.com/, http://www.centerforinquiry.net/speakers/blaskiewicz_bob, http://www.csicop.org/author/rblaskiewicz, http://www.skepticalhumanities.com, http://www.uwec.edu/Staff/blaskir/, https://mobile.twitter.com/rjblaskiewicz, Hypernatremia, implemented, inaccurate, incidents, include, included, including, inclusion, incurred, individuals, infection, informed, initially, innuendo, inspection, inspectional, instance, intellectually, interviewed, into, investigated, investigation, investigational, investigator, involves, IRB, just, known, lab, last, laugh, legal, legislation, letter, liars, life, like, limited, list, mafia, maintain, man", manufactures, Many, matter, mean, means, measurement, measurements, meet, members, might, missive, Missouri", money, monitor, month, more, most, my, name, Newsie, newspaper, Next, none, notes, nothingness, observed, office, online, only, other, out, outcome, outcomes, over, Overdose, overdosed, overdoses, overload, oversight, own, Partial Response, patented, patient, patients, people, period, pharmacy, physician, piss, please, plethora, prescribes, pretend, prevent, prices, primary, prime, prior, process, programmable, progress, prostitutes, protect, protocol, protocols, provide, pump, push, qualify, r-but-r, rbutr, reading, receiving, recorded, redact, redacted, related, released, removed, report, reported, request, requested, required, requirements, requires, research, Response, review, reviewed, reviews, rights, rjblatherskiewicz, role, Room, Sadly, SAE, safety, said, saying, says, seems, select, sells, sent, several, shoot, show, shut, sick, signed, silly, similar, since, sincerely, single, site, Skeptical Humanities, skepticalhumanities, Sodium, some, something, specifically, stable Disease, Stanislaw Burzynski, starting, statement, statements, stock, studies, Study, stunning, subject, subjects, such, suggestion, support, supposed, take, The Skeptics, their, them, therapeutic, there, these, they, thieves, this, time, told, touch, Treating, treatment, trials, tumor, unable, Under”, understand, unproven, unpublishable, unthinkable, until, urgent, USATODAY, valuable, various, via, virtualskeptics, walks, wall, waste, way, week, weeks, welfare, were, WHAT, when, which, Wisconsin" http://uwec.edu/Staff/blaskir/, with, without, worksheets, world, would, writing, wrote, Years, you, your, yourself, zinger | Leave a reply

SkeptiCowards© CrowdSource http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/2013/10/a-message-to-a-djt/

Posted on October 31, 2013 by didymusjudasthomas
Reply

20131030-202022.jpg
——————————————————————
[1]
======================================
Woo Fighter – 10/1/2013 – 8:46 pm

“Guy,”

“He also stated quite frankly during the Google Hangout that nothing will ever change his mind”
——————————————————————
Woo, Bob did NOT provide enough evidence that would cause me to “change my mind”
——————————————————————
“So what’s the point of any further discourse?”
——————————————————————
Woo, the point is, it gives you the opportunity to explain why you lied to The Guardian [2]
——————————————————————
“His idea of “debate” is having critics post comments on his blog; whether that is to drive up page views or merely to seek attention we’ll never know”
——————————————————————
Woo, who suggested leaving comments on my blog ?

Bob ? [3]

9/28/2013 Google+ Hangout
——————————————————————
1:13:00
——————————————————————
“Okay, I’ll look at that, and I will respond to it once I’ve taken a look at that, okay ?“

“Um, and I’ll respond on your web-site“

“Um, seems only fair“
——————————————————————
1:14:00
——————————————————————
2:09:00
——————————————————————
“… and don’t worry I will go to your site and I will comment on on on what you’ve run“
——————————————————————
2:10:15
——————————————————————
2:18:00
——————————————————————
“Um, I will look at your web-site, and we will, uh, we, uh, you, oh make sure that I I go to your blog and and I talk there“
——————————————————————
2:19:00
——————————————————————
“What none of us understands is his motivation”

“I have discussed this privately in e-mails with Bob B. and you, Guy”

“When asked about this during the session on Saturday all he said was that he wanted to correct what he perceives as misinformation from Burzynski critics on social media”
——————————————————————
Woo, you’re obviously NOT from Texas

It’s like a whole ‘nother Country

My motivation ?

I am a Texan and an American and I do NOT have any respect for individuals who lie about cancer treatment on social media

Verstehen ?

There’s a saying:

“Don’t mess with Texas”
——————————————————————
“It has to go deeper than that”

“He didn’t wake up one day and out of the blue decide he was going to champion Burzynski”

“He has to have some connection, either personal or commercial”
——————————————————————
Woo, you’re still wrong

Prove it
——————————————————————
“The sheer amount of time and effort he’s pored into writing hundreds, if not thousands of comments on science blogs, his rabid attempts to edit Wikipedia and his own blog posts indicates he something invested”
——————————————————————
Woo, why don’t you count the amount of comments I posted on “Orac’s” Respectful Insolence science blog and let everyone know the results ?
——————————————————————
“He denied he works for Burzynski as he stated he doesn’t even live in Texas anymore, but that is irrelevant”

“I don’t believe Marc Stephens lived in Texas for the duration of time he represented the clinic”
——————————————————————
Woo, who cares what you think about Marc Stephens ?

Prove it
——————————————————————
“I wish he would just be honest and tell us why he has spent devoted so much of his time over the past year (almost) promoting and supporting Burzynski (and Merola, for that matter)”
——————————————————————
Woo, where have I been “promoting and supporting” them ?

Everything on my blog is devoted to showing how “The Skeptics™” lie
——————————————————————
“I was going to say it would be hard to go back to calling him an idiot after hearing him speak on Saturday, as he became humanized”
——————————————————————
Woo, I have no problem calling you an “idiot” after you lied about me [2]
——————————————————————
“His folksy “y’all” and his laughter made him a real person”

“He was no longer just words on a screen, but a living, breathing human being”

“However after seeing the Tweets he posted immediately following the Hangout, where he reverted to his juvenile insults, his name-calling, his inability to write a coherent sentence and his out-and-out lack of respect for people like you and Dr. Gorksi has made me reevaluate my stance”
——————————————————————
Woo, please cite one of these “supposed” Tweets you have a problem with

Surely you did NOT think I was giving Bob carte blanche to continue on Twitter without proving his case ?
——————————————————————
“He simply deserves to be ignored”

“He has a serious personality disorder and doesn’t merit any of our attention ever again”
——————————————————————
Woo, my personality is serious enough NOT to lie about people to The Guardian

Do you have a serious “compulsive liar” personality disorder ?
======================================
Guy Chapman – 10/2/2013 – 12:26 am

“He kind of admitted it when he said that he’d be persuaded by the FDA not having granted phase 3 approval; defining your rejection criteria according to some test whose outcome is already know is one of the techniques used by homeopaths”
——————————————————————
Guy, which homeopathic “remedy” has received Orphan Drug Designation (ODD) and FDA Phase 3 approval ?
——————————————————————
“You do not interpret this thing as I would like, therefore you are denying this thing happened, therefore you lie, is another,”
——————————————————————
Guy, what massive cognitive dissonance dreamworld are you living in ?
======================================
Guy Chapman – 10/2/2013 – 12:28 am

“Actually, we know what he is”

“A troll”

“Why did we let ourselves get sucked in?”
——————————————————————
“Troll” is an excuse cowards use to try and label someone in order to claim that they should NOT be put in a position to do something they agreed to
======================================
IamBreastCancer – 10/2/2013 – 12:27 am

“Excellent summary, Guy”

“I agree with WooFighter that his motivation is suspect, but there are some desperately lonely attention-seeking people out there who will grasp onto any controversial issue just to get “in the game.””

“As a cancer patient myself, I was struck by the fact that he could yammer on for almost 2-1/2 hours without showing a shred of concern or compassion for cancer patients or legitimate cancer treatment questions”

“His behavior before, during and since the debate clearly shows he absolutely has no regard for real facts or evidence”

“I’m thankful that he’s unable to write coherently, as it cripples his capacity for causing harm to cancer patients”

“Unlike so many other charlatans out there, I don’t think he represents much of a threat to patient safety, just a lot of noise and bandwidth waste”

“His 15 minutes of fame needs to end”
——————————————————————
Quidama, I’m sorry you have cancer, but it sounds to me like you seriously need a “reality check”: [4]
——————————————————————
A. Tried to “control the conversation”
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
B. Interrupted the other individual the most:
1. 30+ – Bob Blaskiewicz interrupted DJT
2. (20+ back at ya) – DJT interrupted BB
——————————————————————
C. Asked the most questions:
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
D. Most speaking time:
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
E. Most words:
1. 13,933 – Bob Blaskiewicz
2. 8,847 – DJT
——————————————————————
F. Most characters:
1. 66,123 – Bob Blaskiewicz
2. 43,245 – DJT
——————————————————————
G. Acted as if they were teaching a class, and dictating what your possible responses were, implying that they did NOT consider this to be a “debate” where the participants were free to choose their own responses:
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
H. Proved they do NOT know how to debate
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
I. Proved they do NOT have manners
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
J. Must have thought they were on the Morton Downey Jr. talk show (or do you prefer Jerry Springer ?)
1. Bob Blaskiewicz
2.
——————————————————————
K. Controlled themself best:
1.
2. DJT
——————————————————————
L. Did NOT need help from any pro-position pundits
1.
2. DJT
——————————————————————
“Thanks for all you do!”
——————————————————————
You’re welcome

20131031-001645.jpg
REFERENCES:
======================================
[1] – A message to DJT
——————————————————————
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/2013/10/a-message-to-a-djt/
======================================
[2] – Dr. David H. “Orac” Gorski “Oracolyte” Woo Fighter Poo Biter admits to LYING to “The Guardian”:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/10/dr-david-h-orac-gorski-oracolyte-woo-fighter-poo-biter-admits-to-lying-to-the-guardian/
======================================
[3] – Why “The Skeptics™” Perfessor Robert J. (don’t call me “Bobby”) “Bob” Blaskiewicz (@rjblaskiewicz) of University of Wisconsin, Eau Claire, “Fame,” is a Coward and a Liar:
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/13/why-the-skeptics-perfessor-robert-j-dont-call-me-bobby-bob-blaskiewicz-rjblaskiewicz-of-university-of-wisconsin-eau-claire-fame-is-a-coward-and-a-liar/
====================================
[4] – Fun Facts From September 28, 2013 “The Skeptics™” Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51
——————————————————————
https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/07/fun-facts-from-september-28-2013-the-skeptics-burzynski-discussion-by-bob-blaskiewicz-21951/
====================================

Posted in Bob Blaskiewicz (Robert J. Blaskiewicz @rjblaskiewicz), critique, critiques, critiqued, critiquing, FDA, United States Food and Drug Administration, Guy Chapman, Orphan Drug Designation (ODD), The Skeptics, The Telegraph (The Daily Telegraph) | Tagged "9/28/2013 Google+ Hangout", "A Message to DJT", "A Message to Guy “Can’t Git-R-Done” Chapman", "Bob J. Blaskiewicz", "Bobby Blaskiewicz", "control the conversation”, "Dr. David H. Orac Gorski Oracolyte Woo Fighter Poo Biter admits to LYING to The Guardian”, "Eau Claire", "Fun Facts From September 28, "It’s like a whole other Country", "Jerry Springer", "Morton Downey Jr.", "name-calling", "orphan drug designation", "phase 3 approval", "pro-position pundits", "Prove it", "reality check”, "Rob J. Blaskiewicz", "Robert Bob Blaskiewicz", "Robert J. Blaskiewicz", "SkeptiCowards© CrowdSource http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/2013/10/a-message-to-a-djt/", "social media", "The Guardian", "Why The Skeptics™ Perfessor Robert J. (don’t call me Bobby) Bob Blaskiewicz (@rjblaskiewicz) of University of Wisconsin, "Woo Fighter", "You’re Welcome", 2013 The Skeptics™ Burzynski discussion: By Bob Blaskiewicz – 2:19:51", @IamBreastCancer, @rjblaskiewicz, @SceptiGuy, @vGuyUK, absolutely, Acted, American, and don’t worry I will go to your site and I will comment on on on what you’ve run“, and I will respond to it once I’ve taken a look at that, and I’ll respond on your web-site“, and we will, attention, attention-seeking", “15 minutes of fame”, “Bob B.", “carte blanche", “change my mind”, “compulsive liar”, “Don’t mess with Texas”, “living breathing human being", “Marc Stephens", “Okay, “Um, bandwidth, BB, behavior, blog, blogs, Bob Blaskiewicz, Burzynski, Cancer, capacity, charlatans, choose, class, clinic, cognitive, coherent, coherently, comments, compassion, concern, Controlled, controversial, cowards, cripples, criteria, Critic, critics, Debate, denied, denying, deserves, desperately, devoted, dictating, discourse, disorder, dissonance, DJT, Dr. Gorksi", dreamworld, duration, Eric Merola, evidence, excuse, F.D.A., FACTS, Fame, FDA, folksy, free, granted, grasp, Guy, Guy Chapman, guychapman, harm, homeopathic, homeopaths, honest, http://chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg, https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/09/10/dr-david-h-orac-gorski-oracolyte-woo-fighter-poo-biter-admits-to-lying-to-the-guardian/, https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/03/a-message-to-guy-cant-git-r-done-chapman/, https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/07/fun-facts-from-september-28-2013-the-skeptics-burzynski-discussion-by-bob-blaskiewicz-21951/, https://stanislawrajmundburzynski.wordpress.com/2013/10/13/why-the-skeptics-perfessor-robert-j-dont-call-me-bobby-bob-blaskiewicz-rjblaskiewicz-of-university-of-wisconsin-eau-claire-fame-is-a-coward-an, http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk/blahg/2013/10/a-message-to-a-djt/, https://mobile.twitter.com/SceptiGuy, https://mobile.twitter.com/vGuyUK, humanized, I will look at your web-site, I’ll look at that, idiot, ignored, implying, inability, insults, interpret, interrupted, invested, irrelevant, is a Coward and a Liar", juvenile, laughter, legitimate, lie, lied, living, lonely, manners, massive, merit, Merola, misinformation, motivated, Motivation, noise, ODD, oh make sure that I I go to your blog and and I talk there“, Orac, outcome, participants, patients, person, personality, possible", promote, promoting, proved, Questions, Quidama, rabid, real, reevaluate, regard, rejection, remedy, represented, represents, respect, Respectful Insolence, responses, safety, science, seems only fair“, serious, seriously, shred, speaking, stance, sucked, support, supporting, suspect, teaching, techniques, test, Texan, Texas, The Skeptics, threat, treatment, troll, Tweet, tweets, Twitter, uh, Verstehen, waste, we, Wikipedia, Woo, WooFighter, yammer, you | Leave a reply

Search

Recent posts

  • Pete Cohen films Pat and Steve Clarkson January 15, 2014
  • Pete Cohen talks to Steve and Mary Jo Siegel January 14, 2014
  • Pete Cohen talks with Doug Olson January 10, 2014
  • Pete Cohen talks with Burzynski Patient January 8, 2014
  • Dr. Li-Chuan Chin, PhD, National Cancer Institute Scientist (1991-1997) talks about Dr. Burzynski and Antineoplastons January 6, 2014

Archives

Categories

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.com
Blog at WordPress.com.
Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • Didymus Judas Thomas' Hipocritical Oath Blog
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Report this content
    • View site in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar